Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Maru Gambles

Channel

Maru Gambles

@marugambles

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,545subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001678598618
TypeChannel
Username@marugambles
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/marugambles

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,5451,5791,5627 August 2026 — 1,579 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,579 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,578 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,575 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,572 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,570 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,567 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,565 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,561 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,555 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,552 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,549 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,545 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,540–1,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 14:581,545-4
14 Sept 2026, 04:181,549-3
10 Sept 2026, 08:551,552-3
4 Sept 2026, 16:581,555-6
1 Sept 2026, 06:461,561-4
29 Aug 2026, 16:351,565-2
27 Aug 2026, 01:041,567-3
24 Aug 2026, 04:161,570-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:421,572-3
17 Aug 2026, 12:481,575-3
10 Aug 2026, 20:411,578-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:311,579no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:231,579first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥541.7%
433.3%
👌216.7%
👨‍💻18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 20:33 UTC151 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @marucallss

Aped this low cap, team had good projects in other chain They will release utility , dev locked 10% supply RHX6900 20K 0xF154E50BC1a964Dd4978bdEcD74ea814bb6E8a15

🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC304 viewsread 7 August 2026

Gambled this tek play, dunno TEAM or of its a slop tech 20K 0x7bf03b84a1bd2fa5e136326426dffa8df6cec618

13 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC294 viewsread 7 August 2026

Heard team pushed to 400K this name on sol Risky 10K 2% max wallet 0x2693268163DA879e24DC54933A5509741DEC73Db

13 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC268 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Gambled some Safehood Risky but we didn’t have a safemoon runner on RH and name is clean 7K 0x8E2906a5bb2FC6673b144B6b9Ad5149da746Bb03

1

11 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC327 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

0x53E191Fb78B76AD76D6360A41C34D084aB73A36B Aped tremp on rh 9K mc

1

7 May 2026, 18:24 UTC651 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aped $ASTROE 15K mc Should be a easy bond , team wants to push long term EXsg6htEwo4vMfpWGYEws9wS6b1BgPLGzfKKkBEapump

4 May 2026, 18:41 UTC731 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Aped this low cap, team been pushing for a while and new catalyst coming Locked a bunch of supply and they plan to lock more Low cap should do some Xs, anime meme 6wGzi19fxz6JjBW4pMNT3Ny2ahTMvJLfeWQCQZ31pump 20K

🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @marugambles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Maru Gambles” (@marugambles), 1,545 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marugambles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.