Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Marxism and history

Channel

Marxism and history

@marx_and_hist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

534subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001163513507
TypeChannel
Username@marx_and_hist
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/marx_and_hist

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5335355349 August 2026 — 533 subscribers9 August 2026 — 533 subscribers18 August 2026 — 535 subscribers1 September 2026 — 533 subscribers10 September 2026 — 534 subscribers9 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 533–535 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 20:21534+1
1 Sept 2026, 23:16533-2
18 Aug 2026, 03:27535+2
9 Aug 2026, 18:30533no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:17533first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4145.6%
3336.7%
🔥88.89%
😢66.67%
👎22.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 08:34 UTC108 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Iván Szelényi (1938–2026), the Hungarian sociologist, has died after a long illness, in the 88th year of his life. Szelényi was one of the most influential scholars of socialist and post-socialist societies. Szelényi’s scholarship occupies a central place in the sociology of state socialism and post-socialist transformation. His studies of class formation, intellectuals, entrepreneurship, poverty, and inequality shap

😢4👍2

25 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC175 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Here are a few photos I took at the California African American Museum in LA and the Black Panther Museum in Oakland.

👍6

25 Jul 2026, 10:53 UTC148 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

I haven’t posted in a while - too much work. Here I've put together a short selection of great #podcasts on the revolutionary Black movement in the United States - from its connections with the Comintern and the CPUSA to the emergence of an independent Marxist workers’ movement in Detroit. Black Radicalism and the USSR — The Eurasian Knot Meredith Roman and Minkah Makalani on Black radicalism, the Comintern, and So

6

8 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC188 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @commonscomua

📚 Сучасна історична наука визначає початком формування націй кінець XVIII століття. Утім, чимало істориків і далі шукають нації в античності, середньовічних королівствах і там, де люди ніколи не мислили себе в національних категоріях 🦖 Проєктуючи сучасне розуміння нації на далеке минуле, вони залишають поза увагою класові відносини, імперії, релігійні та локальні спільноти. Внаслідок чого історія починає виглядати

5

6 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC202 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На Медузе вышел хороший подкаст с украинским историком Георгием Касьяновым о конфликте памятей между Украиной и Польшей, а также об исторических ОУН и УПА. Советую всем, кто хочет разобраться в теме. #ru #podcast

👍10👎21

1 Jul 2026, 10:37 UTC220 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @commonscomua

Чи має Україна радянську історію? 🤷🏻 Після розпаду СРСР у багатьох історичних наративах радянська епоха зображується як завершений, віддалений або навіть екзотичний світ. Водночас Україну зазвичай розглядають або як жертву імперського панування, або як простір національного відродження. Та чи не губиться в такій оптиці власне радянський досвід України? І чому ми так вперто від нього відмовляємося? Про важливість ц

8👍2

23 Jun 2026, 08:14 UTC255 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

A Conversation with Jairus Banaji on A Brief History of Commercial Capitalism #en #ua #article #history #theory Jairus Banaji is one of the most original Marxist historians. In A Brief History of Commercial Capitalism, Banaji intervenes in the classic Marxist debate on the transition to capitalism. His argument should be read as a challenge to Political Marxism (Brenner/Wood, I've already written about them and Chibb

3

17 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC311 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Two great historians have passed away in the last few days - Alex Rabinowitch, an specialist on the Russian Revolution, and an Italian microhistorian Carlo Ginzburg. His Cheese and Worms was a delight to read during my undergraduate studies; after that, I dove into microhistory for a couple of months. Sean Guillory just published a wonderful interview with Rabinowitch that he recorded back in 2017. #en From Guillo

6😢2👍1

9 Jun 2026, 12:00 UTC287 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"The Roots and Afterlives of Soviet Sciences" (as part of the Cambridge seminar Reconsidering Soviet Studies) #en #lecture #event #history 10 June, 17:30 BST, Jesus College, Fulburn Room, or via Zoom https://zoom.us/j/95153676755 Ben Potter: "The Intellectual and Institutional Roots of Marxism in Linguistics: The Case of Nikolai Marr" Isabel Jacobs: "Concepts of Hybridity and Symbiosis in (Post-)Soviet Science and

3

31 May 2026, 08:44 UTC302 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

"Angles of Vision" by Dylan Riley #en #article What is the relationship between Marx’s and Weber’s interpretations of capitalism? Rivers of ink have run seeking to synthesize or counterpose the two great analysts of capitalism... The contrast between the two does not lie primarily in their claims about the origins of capitalism. ... [T]he main issue lies elsewhere, in their standpoints or perspectives. Lukács perhaps

👍5

25 May 2026, 10:51 UTC306 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @LIT4CIPhoto

МАНІФЕСТ ЗА НЕЗАЛЕЖНЕ РЕВОЛЮЦІЙНЕ МИСТЕЦТВО Якщо для розвитку матеріальних виробничих сил революція вимушена встановити соціалістичний режим централізованого плану, то для розвитку інтелектуальної творчості з самого початку слід установити анархічний режим індивідуальної свободи. Жодної влади, жодного диктату, аніяких слідів командування! Напередодні Другої світової війни було чітко видно, що тоталітарні режими, у

👍41

21 May 2026, 06:33 UTC314 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

До дня народження Ґео Шкурупія (1903-1937), одного з найцікавіших українських поетів, "короля футуропрерій", публікую статтю Романа Черевко про його шумову революцію. To mark the birthday of Geo Shkurupii (1903–1937), one of the most fascinating Ukrainian poets and the “king of the futuroprairies,” I am publishing an article by Roman Cherevko about his “noise revolution.” #ua #article #history

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @marx_and_hist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Marxism and history” (@marx_and_hist), 534 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/marx_and_hist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.