Channel
@masana_cards
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003937396933 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @masana_cards |
| Created | 10 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/masana_cards |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 22 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 20 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 19 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 17 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 13 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 13 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 9 | 60.0% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 13.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 13.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На техническом интервью вопрос иногда выходит за пределы вашего опыта. В этот момент легко начать угадывать, лишь бы не отвечать «не знаю» 🤔. Но выдуманная уверенность хуже честного ограничения. Если точного ответа нет, покажите, как вы работаете с неизвестным: 1️⃣ Обозначьте границы своих знаний. 2️⃣ Отделите факты от предположений. 3️⃣ Опишите порядок диагностики. 4️⃣ Скажите, как проверите гипотезу. Допустим, и…
✍2🔥1
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
🔥3❤2
🦝 Канбан: когда работа становится видимой Канбан начинается не с красивой доски и цветных стикеров. Он начинается с честного ответа на три вопроса: Что сейчас находится в работе? Где задачи задерживаются? Почему команда начинает больше, чем успевает завершить? На плакате собрана базовая схема Канбана: • что это за метод и зачем он нужен • как устроена доска и что обозначают её колонки • что такое WIP (Work in Pro…
🔥3
Следующая тема — Kanban или вопросы по Scrum на собеседовании 🎯?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
👍2
Или 3 карточки, после которых #Agile можно нормально объяснить на собеседовании...
🔥1
AGILE БЕЗ МАГИИ (но в одном постере!) 1️⃣ Agile ≠ работа спринтами. Это не Scrum, не встречи и не обещание «быстрее». 2️⃣ Основа — 4 ценности и 12 принципов ПО: чаще давать работающий код, сотрудничать с заказчиком, проверять гипотезы и адаптироваться под новые данные. 3️⃣ Scrum — фреймворк со спринтами, ролями, событиями и артефактами. 4️⃣ Kanban — про поток, контроль WIP и решения на основе flow-метрик. 5️⃣ Су…
🔥1
5 фраз, которые делают ваш опыт слабее на интервью 🔥 1️⃣ «Я занимался разными задачами.» Лучше: «Я работал с несколькими направлениями: процессами, коммуникацией, документацией и поддержкой принятия решений.» ✅ 2️⃣ «Я участвовал в проекте.» Лучше: «Я отвечал за свою часть проекта: собирал требования, координировал участников и фиксировал результаты.» ✅ 3️⃣ «Я стрессоустойчивый.» Лучше: «Я умею расставлять приор…
STAR без занудства STAR — это не модная HR-аббревиатура. Это способ не утонуть в собственном рассказе. Когда вас спрашивают: «Расскажите о сложном проекте», многие начинают с середины, уходят в детали, вспоминают коллегу Сережу, а потом внезапно оказываются в 2021 году и теряют нить вопроса. STAR помогает держать ответ: S — Situation (Ситуация): что происходило? T — Task (Задача): какая была задача? A — Action (Де…
Ошибка: «Я стрессоустойчивый» «Я стрессоустойчивый» — слабая фраза. Не потому, что стрессоустойчивость не нужна, а потому, что так говорит почти каждый. Плохая версия: «I’m stress-resistant and can work under pressure.» Нормальная версия: «I’m used to working in situations where priorities change quickly. For example, when several incidents or requests arrive at the same time, I first separate urgent business impa…
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @masana_cards. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Следующая тема — Kanban или вопросы по Scrum на собеседовании 🎯?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Masana cards — карточки для подготовки к собеседованиям” (@masana_cards), 22 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masana_cards.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.