Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 34% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
56 measurements spanning 88 days, net -591. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,615–54,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 03:31
53,705
-15
1 Nov 2026, 02:40
53,720
-22
31 Oct 2026, 02:19
53,742
-14
30 Oct 2026, 01:47
53,756
-44
28 Oct 2026, 23:31
53,800
-10
27 Oct 2026, 22:45
53,810
-18
26 Oct 2026, 20:07
53,828
-15
25 Oct 2026, 21:09
53,843
-18
24 Oct 2026, 22:35
53,861
-19
23 Oct 2026, 20:16
53,880
-7
22 Oct 2026, 22:54
53,887
-7
21 Oct 2026, 19:21
53,894
-14
20 Oct 2026, 15:10
53,908
-12
19 Oct 2026, 12:00
53,920
-4
18 Oct 2026, 08:16
53,924
-20
17 Oct 2026, 09:21
53,944
-5
16 Oct 2026, 11:18
53,949
-2
15 Oct 2026, 14:14
53,951
-9
14 Oct 2026, 12:09
53,960
-25
13 Oct 2026, 01:47
53,985
first reading
Engagement
483 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 210 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 53,705 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,530
153 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.688%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
153
of 483 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
483 (4 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
1,304,510
Reactions total
8,971
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 21:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,270
Videos
≈4,150
Links
≈6,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 31m
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 182 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
32,118 reactions across 482 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
5,910
18.4%
❤
3,995
12.4%
🤬
3,613
11.2%
👍
3,575
11.1%
😁
2,841
8.85%
😨
2,533
7.89%
🤣
2,359
7.34%
😭
2,306
7.18%
👎
1,147
3.57%
🔥
1,060
3.30%
👏
797
2.48%
😡
635
1.98%
🫡
418
1.30%
🤔
333
1.04%
🥰
277
0.862%
🗿
256
0.797%
😍
63
0.196%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 483 of the 483 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 483 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
1.45%
7 of 483 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
7
posts carrying an erid · 7 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
7,090
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,120
over 476 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqumisn6
1
3 November 2026
3 November 2026
2VtzquzxqBz
1
24 September 2026
24 September 2026
2VtzqwMQ4J7
1
20 August 2026
20 August 2026
2VtzqwsX8Fo
1
30 October 2026
30 October 2026
2Vtzqx3dY2p
1
25 September 2026
25 September 2026
2VtzqxB3mBb
1
13 October 2026
13 October 2026
2VtzqxV6UAg
1
9 October 2026
9 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 483 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Флирт в Инорсе — это когда он тычёт в неё ножом, а она отмахивается от него, как от мухи.
Экстремальная парочка на видео — соседи. Они вместе выпивали, а потом решили переместиться в другую квартиру. В дорогу 69-летний рыцарь зачем-то взял нож и пару раз замахнулся им на подружку. Она не пострадала, но кадры попали к полицейским и пенсионер получил административку за мелкое хулиганство.
❤️ Если не загружаются видео…
Предприниматели, у которых есть счёт в Альфа-Банке, будут соревноваться в лото.
Победители поедут в Москву на завтрак с Денисом Осиным, директором малого и микробизнеса банка. Ещё разыгрывают 100 тысяч рублей, iPhone 18, iPhone 17 и MacBook Air. Чтобы участвовать, достаточно закрыть минимум одну карточку в лото — в приложении для бизнеса или Альфа-Бизнес Онлайн.
22, гуси-лебеди
Только двое кандидатов на пост мэра Уфы сдали экзамен на знание законов — Рустам Шарипов и замглавы администрации Стерлитамака Артур Гафаров.
Проваливший тест Рустам Хафизов рассказал, что участников гоняли по пакету из 464 документов. Говорит, комиссия была жёсткой.
При этом он и двое других "двоечников" не выбыли из гонки. По словам Хафизова, результаты каждого этапа носят рекомендательный характер. 9 ноября все …
Сильное загрязнение воздуха выявили в Уфе — следом за Стерлитамаком и Салаватом.
Уфимцы жалуются на дымку с едким запахом с прошлой недели. На улице Ульяновых нашли превышение этилбензола в 4,1 раза. Это вещество может вызвать головную боль и кашель. На Гафури пыли оказалось в 2,2 раза больше нормы.
В последние несколько дней на смог и запах гари жаловались жители Стерлитамака и Салавата. По этому поводу СК возбуди…
Мужик кинул друга из Кумертау на два миллиона — пообещал купить новую машину в Китае и исчез.
На вахте темщик наплёл 48-летнему Андрею (имя изменено), что лично пригонит авто из-за границы. Но для этого нужны 2,1 млн. За полгода мужчина перевёл приятелю всю сумму. Тот и правда умотал в Китай, но покупать машину не спешил — постоянно находил отговорки.
Андрей устал ждать и написал заявление в полицию. Выяснилось, чт…
На Проспекте Октября — восьмибалльные пробки. От ТЦ "Семья" до Галле поток машин почти не двигается. Если собирались ехать там, лучше перестроить маршрут.
❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши новости есть в MAX
Собака отбила туристов от медведя у Айгирских скал — у неё ранена лапа.
По словам путешественников, во время похода пёс по кличке Снежок бросился на зверя и облаял его. Прежде, чем убежать, тот цапнул собаку за лапу и вырвал кусок кожи. Дальше Снежок идти не смог.
Туристы спустили его с гор на носилках и отвезли к ветеринару. Выздоравливать защитник будет несколько месяцев.
❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши …
Из-за загрязнения воздуха в Стерлитамаке и Салавате СК возбудил уголовное дело.
Жители обоих городов уже несколько дней жалуются на запах гари. Расследование взял на контроль центральный аппарат Следкома.
❤Если не загружаются видео и фото, наши новости есть в MAX
🤡7🫡6👍5😨2🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 483 posts we hold for @mash_batash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mash_batash edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 46 posts on @mash_batash as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
10
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Ufa_rb | Новости. Уфа Башкортостан @ufa_rb · 269,917#1
Куда пойти в Уфе | Афиша Уфы @kuda_go_ufa · 23,918#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Моя Уфа| Новости Уфы и Башкирии @myufa_rb · 24,049 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
БашДТП Новости+ @bdtprb2 · 52,572 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
@Ufa_rb | Новости. Уфа Башкортостан @ufa_rb · 269,917 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
Стерлитамак | События | Подслушано @Sterlitamak_podslushal · 36,575 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 1 September 2026
Mash Iptash @mash_iptash · 69,787 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Mash Siberia @mash_siberia · 52,337 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
Amber Mash @amber_mash · 40,446 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Жесть Уфа @zhest_ufa_102 · 21,078 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 23 September 2026
Башкирия Сейчас @bashkiria_seichas · 38,811 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 1 September 2026
Ural Mash @url_mash · 66,747 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Стерлитамак | События | Новости @Sterlitamak_narod · 20,502 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 27 September 2026
Уфа | Новости | События @ufa_novosti · 24,022 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 September 2026
Enter Уфа @enter_ufa · 39,907 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
Халык Знает @HalykZnaet · 19,759 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 September 2026
Башкирия Online @rb_russia · 157,479 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 12 August 2026
БашДТП | Bash.dtp.official @bdtprb · 289,001 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Babr Mash @babr_mash · 41,981 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Уфа с огоньком @ufatop1 · 37,185 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 31 August 2026
Ni Mash @mash_nimash · 42,057 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 August 2026
Mash Gor @mash_gor · 43,712 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Новости Башкирии | Ҙур секрет @novostibashkiria · 42,223 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
Новости Уфы и Республики Башкортостан | Уфа @ufa_smi · 154,423 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 12 August 2026
Короче, Уфа @ufakoroche · 31,082 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 5 September 2026
Уфа ТУТ! Афиша и новости @ufa_tyt · 37,905 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 39 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mash Batash” (@mash_batash), 53,705 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mash_batash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.