Channel
@masha_is_busy
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
340subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001240474691 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @masha_is_busy |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/masha_is_busy |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 340 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 342 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 341 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 338 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 341 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 342 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 343 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 343 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
56 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5219868291077531920 | 22 | 39.3% | |
| custom 5220187106499912619 | 10 | 17.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 16.1% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 10.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 8.93% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 5.36% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.79% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Написала и думаю, что радуюсь этому проекту, как первому. Хотя я буквально каждую неделю презентую что-нибудь клиентам, обсуждаю проекты, собираю комментарии... Это правда был особенный раз + был страх про другой менталитет, про другой визуальный контекст... На этом кейсе страхи не оправдались. Но всё таки была одна особенность: клиенты никогда не называли меня "querida" — «дорогая»🙈
😁6👍3
Signed Masha Yartceva
Наверное уже никто не помнит, прошлой осенью ко мне внезапно постучалась испанская клиентка, и я делилась тут шоком радостью здесь и здесь. Для контекста: я живу в Испании почти четыре года и столько же mas o menos учу язык. Но мой язык еще очень далек от идеала для того, чтобы вести рабочие переговоры. В прошлом году выдался шанс и спойлер: мы успешно завершили проект. Остановилась я на том, что отправила смету — …
custom 52198682910775319209🔥2
Signed Masha Yartceva
Самое красивое отпускное за июль: [1] Райский остров с дворцом и павлинами недалеко от Милана [2] Случайный концерт на площади рядом с Уффици [3] Выставка Ротко в старом палаццо. Для полного погружения пригодились лекции "Синхронизации" [4-6] Наконец-то попала на Венецианскую биеннале. В этом году много африканского искусства😍 [7] Ещё один случайный оперный концерт под окнами нашего номера [8] Музей Пегги Гугге…
💔3🔥2custom 52198682910775319201custom 52201871064999126191
Signed Masha Yartceva
Каждый год к Web Summit мы делаем блокноты вместо визиток — с фразой года. Первый год это было "look mom, I’m at a conference, I'm all grown up" — именно так мы ощущали поездку на огромную конфу и прикрывали неуверенность. В прошлом году — "Scale&Play". Мы и наши клиенты хотели расти и получать удовольствие от процесса. Этот год совсем другой. Play&scale превратился в адаптацию. Год ощущается тяжелее — да что уж, …
custom 52201871064999126195👍2
Signed Masha Yartceva
Сегмент или нет Где-то в первых лекциях курса Замесина я услышала фразу про то, что много бизнесов работают не с тем сегментом. Начинают с кем-то работать, хуже того, начинают на них зарабатывать, а где-то рядом лежит золото, но фокус не там. Думаю, это классная фраза, чтобы зацепить внимание. Но какой у нас сегмент?.. В индустрии можно увидеть нишевание по отрасли, например, "сайты для edtech", "брендинг для крипт…
🔥1custom 52198682910775319201
Signed Masha Yartceva
Начала проходить курс Вани Замесина "Как делать продукт" Давно читаю его канал, но только сейчас поняла, к какой именно задаче приложить эти знания. Рынок сейчас шаткий, и мне хочется твёрдой почвы под ногами. Буду по его методике разбирать собственно нашу студию как продукт. У меня было множество касаний с Ваней, два года назад я откликнулась и участвовала в их касдевах в момент, когда они изучали сегменты для кур…
custom 52198682910775319208👏1
Signed Masha Yartceva
Один день из жизни кофаундера и арт-директора бизи Маши 💜 Подглядываем, чем Маша занята в течение дня! Как вам рубрика?
🔥4custom 52201871064999126194custom 52198682910775319203
Signed Masha Yartceva
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @masha_is_busy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маша из бизи” (@masha_is_busy), 340 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masha_is_busy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.