Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @. masquerader

Channel

@. masquerader

@masqueraber

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

11subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003894197130
TypeChannel
Username@masqueraber
Created30 May 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/masqueraber

Growth

11131214 August 2026 — 13 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11 subscribers14 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 03:3711-1
23 Aug 2026, 12:2712-1
14 Aug 2026, 17:0013no change
14 Aug 2026, 16:4713first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 3 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1523.8%
custom 54540879287686497441015.9%
custom 5933560000176725661914.3%
custom 5934046409517964611914.3%
custom 5431662916673775535812.7%
custom 533481429036697283069.52%
custom 533489005359007454969.52%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jul 2026, 22:20 UTC746 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 593404640951796461121custom 54316629166737755351custom 59335600001767256611

5 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC806 views24 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🌟 ❤️Love enough and you start to bleed !❤️ Love stings and it don't come clean :: Love enough and you will start a scene … ♡ Love enough and you'll come apart at the seams You look at love, it will burn your eyes Kind of shocked and you'll

custom 59335600001767256617custom 54316629166737755356custom 593404640951796461165

6 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC≈2,200 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

6 Jun 2026, 17:20 UTC≈2,010 views34 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🌟 ИНФО ; АРТ - ПАБЛИК ; ЩИТПОСТ [ уточняйте в лс :-) ] 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩 @masqueraber [ переходник ]

custom 5454087928768649744109custom 53348142903669728306custom 53348900535900745496custom 54316629166737755351custom 59335600001767256611custom 59340464095179646111

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @masqueraber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@. masquerader” (@masqueraber), 11 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/masqueraber.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.