Channel
@matchnaneve
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
250subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002687187945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @matchnaneve |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/matchnaneve |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 250 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 254 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 257 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 262 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 262 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
122 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 71 | 58.2% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 17.2% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 9.84% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 4.92% | |
| 🍓 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мы запускаем благотворительный аукцион, где можно будет приобрести памятные джерси «Матч на Неве». Это не просто борьба за редкий лот — это шанс вместе помочь детям с редкими заболеваниями и поддержать подопечных фонда «Люди-маяки». ❤️ В первом блоке лотов — три уникальных джерси: Сергей Широков — олимпийский чемпион, чемпион мира и обладатель Кубка Гагарина. Сергей Плотников — чемпион мира, многолетний капитан С…
❤10🍓5💘3👍1👏1
Нападающие «Авангарда» Николай Прохоркин, Дмитрий Рашевский, Василий Пономарёв, а также вратарь Иван Просветов в воскресенье приняли участие в благотворительном шоу «Матч на Неве» 🌊 🏒 На лёд СК «Юбилейный» вышли игроки КХЛ и НХЛ, обладатели Кубка Гагарина и Кубка Стэнли, чтобы вместе поддержать детей с редкими заболеваниями и помочь им сделать шаг к выздоровлению. Вместе с другими хоккеистами наши «ястребы» провели…
❤12💘3😍2
Благотворительный хоккей на Неве пошёл не по плану, когда на скамейку зашёл Дед 😂 Сначала он был у белых, потом перешёл к тёмным — и началось: тёмные забивают, белые страдают. Но в решающий момент Дед вернулся назад к белым и считаю сделал правильный выбор, так как победили беленькие . Итог: белые — чемпионы, а Дед — MVP двух команд одновременно 🏆 Было громко, весело и абсолютно непредсказуемо! А если честно победил…
❤10👍5🔥3
19 июля прошёл благотворительный "Матч на Неве" По сравнению с прошлым годом, мероприятие стало намного масштабнее. Пришло много хоккеистов из КХЛ и не только (даже блогеры) и болельщиков. Все не только хорошо провели время, но и помогли больным детям, собрав деньги на лечение #интервью с нападающим "Торпедо" Алексеем Кручининым
🔥9❤5❤🔥1
Хайлайты нашего матча можете увидеть тут 13 минут чистого удовольствия ❤️
❤6🔥2
Много интересного было снято на нашем матче 🔥 Константин Кожанов сделал легкий блиц для Ивана Просветова 👍🏼
👍6❤2🔥2
Конкурс на самый красивый буллит, точно хит любого шоу матча! У нас он тоже состоялся. Чей бросок впечатлил вас больше?🏒🔥📣
❤11
Фотоотчёт с матча уже в нашем сообществе ВК! 📸✨ Мы разобрали огромное количество снимков и собрали их в два альбома: Фотографии нашего шоу: https://vk.ru/album-238579654_309380081 Фотографии наших гостей: https://vk.ru/album-238579654_309924672 Сохраняйте любимые кадры на память, отмечайте друзей и подписывайтесь на наше сообщество во ВКонтакте, чтобы не пропустить новые фото и видео! 🎉🫶
❤15🔥5😍3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @matchnaneve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Матч на Неве»” (@matchnaneve), 250 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matchnaneve.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.