Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5🤩4🔥2💯1custom 52129546220916039401custom 53483735622499800471

Channel
@math_mom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
422subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001669615586 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @math_mom |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/math_mom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 422 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 420 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,838 |
| Reactions total | 338 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
361 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 113 | 31.3% | |
| custom 5348373562249980047 | 56 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 9.97% | |
| custom 5235565997112433719 | 33 | 9.14% | |
| 🤩 | 33 | 9.14% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 6.65% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 3.05% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 2.77% | |
| 💋 | 9 | 2.49% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 1.94% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.94% | |
| custom 5449423783263744197 | 5 | 1.39% | |
| custom 5249052099932605222 | 2 | 0.554% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.554% | |
| custom 5212954622091603940 | 1 | 0.277% | |
| custom 5456162625605868622 | 1 | 0.277% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.277% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.277% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.277% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5🤩4🔥2💯1custom 52129546220916039401custom 53483735622499800471
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️остались места на годовой курс по подготовке к ЕГЭ и ОГЭ по математике🔥 успей до старта: 1️⃣4️⃣ℹ️ 0️⃣9️⃣ ЗАПИСАТЬСЯ ТУТ
❤🔥4🥰3🔥2🤩2custom 52490520999326052221custom 53483735622499800471
подкаст на тему выбора формата🤍 Коротко о плюсах и минусах, и моем опыте!
❤🔥8custom 53483735622499800474💯2🔥2🍓1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥7🔥3custom 53483735622499800472custom 54494237832637441972🍓1💘1
онлайн-школы 🤍 ➕ 1. Низкая цена в целом, и онлайн школы стали повышать цены, месяц обучения стоит 7к 2. Очень много материалов и уроков этот пункт я хочу выделить и как плюс, и как минус. Знаю, что по информатике и по математике в онлайн школах стоят 7-8 вебинаров в неделю 🤡 Все мы понимаем, что это путь к выгоранию 3. Гибкость расписания когда учишься в ОШ можешь смотреть только записи, так как присутствие твое н…
❤🔥3🔥1🤩1🥰1custom 52490520999326052221custom 53483735622499800471
Занятия в группах🤍 ➕ 1. Социальное взаимодействие - учит работать в команде. 2. Мотивация и обмен опытом это 100% факт, ребята мотивируются друг от друга, стараются вообще за год не пропускать уроки и делать ДЗ❤️ 3. Динамика обучения Групповые занятия более интересные и энергичные, плюс все время держат в фокусе, так как спрашиваю всех рандомно и знаю болевые точки😂 4. Приятная цена Час в группе стоит до 1000₽, ч…
💯5❤🔥3🔥3🤩2custom 53483735622499800471
Индивидуальные уроки с преподавателем 🤍 ➕ 1. Персональный подход и индивидуальные программы под твои знания 2. Отсутствие внешних факторов (вопросов других учеников) 3. Гибкий график, возможность адаптировать занятия под ваши потребности (например, больше времени нужно чтобы пройти тригонометрию) ➖ 1. Очень дорого!!! если готовиться на высокий балл, то нужно готовиться с экспертом ЕГЭ - ставка от 3000₽ за 60 мин…
❤🔥8⚡1💯1🔥1😍1custom 53483735622499800471
Начало учебного года, еще есть время определиться, какой формат занятий выбрать: 1. Индивидуальные уроки с преподавателем 2. Групповые уроки 3. Онлайн-курсы хочу рассказать про плюсы и минусы каждого формата, возможно, что я помогу вам выбрать тот самый - ваш формат❤️
❤🔥7💋5🔥3🥰2custom 53483735622499800472🤩1
Всех с Днём знаний!❤️ тут я в 11 классе, кидайте свои фоточки с линейки!
❤🔥15🤩8custom 53483735622499800478🔥2custom 52355659971124337191custom 54561626256058686221
Готовы?😂
custom 523556599711243371913😭10custom 53483735622499800475💩1🤬1
разбираю сообщения после вчерашнего вебинара + добавляю ребят по чатам вот так активно врываемся в учебный год 😱 хочу помочь вам с информацией ОБО МНЕ ОТЗЫВЫ УЧЕНИКОВ О ГРУППАХ И ТАРИФАХ 2026 ЗАПИСАТЬСЯ НА КУРС
🤩5❤🔥3custom 53483735622499800472💯1🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 523556599711243371911custom 53483735622499800479🔥5🤩2😍2custom 54494237832637441971
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @math_mom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МАТЬ МАТЕМАТИКИ | РЕПЕТИТОР ЕГЭ” (@math_mom), 422 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/math_mom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.