Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Matrix Mundial

Channel

Matrix Mundial

@matrixmundial

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,218subscribers

-91 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001204165493
TypeChannel
Username@matrixmundial
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/matrixmundial

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,2189,3099,263.57 August 2026 — 9,309 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,307 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,303 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,289 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,283 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,270 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,252 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,244 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,240 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,237 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,253 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,232 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,231 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,218 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -91. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,204–9,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:419,218-13
15 Sept 2026, 02:029,231-1
11 Sept 2026, 01:569,232-21
6 Sept 2026, 02:369,253+16
2 Sept 2026, 00:489,237-3
30 Aug 2026, 01:479,240-4
27 Aug 2026, 04:079,244-8
23 Aug 2026, 21:089,252-18
20 Aug 2026, 02:019,270-13
17 Aug 2026, 09:549,283-6
13 Aug 2026, 11:249,289-14
10 Aug 2026, 11:069,303-4
7 Aug 2026, 02:189,307-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:319,309first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 9,218 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,050
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held27 (2 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total4,199
Reactions total119
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,039 reactions across 27 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍35133.8%
🔥13212.7%
11911.5%
😱10810.4%
😈959.14%
👀787.51%
💊726.93%
🤯292.79%
😨242.31%
💯161.54%
😢60.577%
🙏50.481%
🥰30.289%
🤬10.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,039 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC469 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🗂 NOVA FERRAMENTA DISPONÍVEL: ARQUIVO INWO Exclusivo para membros do Plano Anual. O Arquivo INWO reúne 544 cartas digitalizadas em alta resolução, em um ambiente próprio de pesquisa, organização e investigação. Você pode pesquisar cartas, ampliar detalhes, favoritar, criar notas e coleções, comparar conteúdos e usar a Mesa de Investigação para organizar conexões e análises. Não é apenas um acervo de imagens. É u

👍6🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,120 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Que coincidência, não é mesmo? 33 americanos e 33 britânicos desaparecidos na tragédia do Nepal. A mídia vai despejando os números cabalísticos e, para quem está com os olhos espirituais abertos, consegue ver os sinais de que não se tratou de algo natural. Lucas Neves - @MatrixMundial

👍19😱14👀74😈4

27 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC≈1,190 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 NEPAL: O MISTÉRIO DO CÓDIGO 238 Uma das maiores catástrofes dos últimos dias devastou o Nepal. Mas durante a investigação encontrei uma sequência de coincidências envolvendo a data, o rio, a avalanche e as geleiras do Himalaia. Todas apontando para o mesmo número: 238. Coincidência? 🎥 Assista à investigação completa: https://youtu.be/_niEzXxpVPg

😱15👀6👍42🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC≈1,420 views34 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🌊 PREPARE-SE PARA O SUPER EL NIÑO Estão dizendo que tudo o que estamos vendo é consequência de um fenômeno natural. Mas quando colocamos El Niño, terremotos, instalações ionosféricas e certos padrões no mesmo mapa, surgem perguntas difíceis de ignorar. 🔴 Novo vídeo no ar: https://youtu.be/gPMS76Xq4Js

👍17🔥10👀6💊1

21 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC≈1,990 views24 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔎 GEMATRIUM CODEX E se grandes eventos escondessem mensagens ocultas, um código invisível para maioria? Hoje estamos liberando uma ferramenta criada para rastrear padrões, cruzar símbolos, datas, números e conhecimento ocultista: para revelar conexões ritualísticas que normalmente passam desapercebidas. Gematria, astrologia, Tarot, Cabala, calendários, eventos celestes e tratados históricos reunidos em um único si

😱9👍5🔥43👀3

18 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈2,460 views31 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Algo novo está chegando. Uma ferramenta criada para fazer algo que, até onde sabemos, não existe reunido desta forma em nenhum outro lugar do mundo: investigar grandes acontecimentos através de um gigantesco corpus de tradições esotéricas, ocultistas e secretas. Tarot. Cabala. Gematria. Astrologia. Quadrados Mágicos. Grimórios. Correspondências planetárias. Calendários. Textos tradicionais. Sistemas divinatórios e

😱16👍10🔥41

11 Aug 2026, 23:21 UTC≈3,900 views25 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

E se um acontecimento pudesse ser investigado por várias camadas ao mesmo tempo? Números. Datas. Céu. Astrologia. Tradições ocultistas. Fontes históricas. Correspondências. A próxima versão do Gematrium começa a reunir tudo isso em um único centro de pesquisa. Este é só um pequeno vislumbre. Lucas Neves - @MatrixMundial

👍196

6 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC≈3,930 views28 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 MAIS DE 20 OVNIs GIGANTES NA LUA? Astrônomos ucranianos afirmam ter registrado objetos em forma de disco e anel, alguns com dimensões gigantescas, movendo-se próximos à Lua. No vídeo, eu mostro as imagens do caso, a matéria divulgada pelo Daily Mail e uma conexão perturbadora com Transformers: O Lado Oculto da Lua. Hollywood já estava preparando o público para essa narrativa? ▶️ Assista agora: https://youtu.be/

😱16🔥5💯41👀1💊1

4 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC≈3,620 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 A BÍBLIA OPRIME MULHERES? Um teólogo afirmou que a Bíblia é machista e trata mulheres como inferiores. Neste vídeo, analisamos as principais acusações e respondemos versículo por versículo. A mulher deve ficar calada? Paulo era machista? Eva recebeu toda a culpa? ▶️ Assista agora e tire suas próprias conclusões: https://youtu.be/TPZ8V8oGz3U

👍19😢64

3 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC≈3,990 views36 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 FAUCI SE CALOU NO SENADO O diário dele foi revelado e, durante a audiência, Fauci recorreu à 5ª Emenda diante de 111 perguntas sobre a pandemia e a Covid. O que ele sabia? e por que não respondeu? ▶️ Assista agora: https://youtu.be/5-cD5wqA5J0

🔥25😈101

31 Jul 2026, 16:48 UTC≈3,680 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 "Exu não é diabo", e chamar de demônio é racismo religioso? Um cristão usou a própria Bíblia para defender essa afirmação. Será que isso está correto ou é uma distorção? Entramos no debate e analisamos cada argumento à luz das Escrituras. ▶️ Assista agora: https://youtu.be/VxzyWXmrPxc

😈19🔥7🤯21

30 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈3,350 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨 O que apareceu no céu antes do caos no Rio Grande do Sul? Aviões deixando rastros persistentes, uma aurora roxa incomum, antenas ligadas ao HAARP, tornados, granizo e cidades destruídas pelas enchentes. Seria tudo consequência do El Niño ou existem elementos que a grande mídia não está mostrando? Neste vídeo, reunimos imagens, reportagens e um documento da Força Aérea dos Estados Unidos sobre modificação climáti

😈23🤯7👀5😱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @matrixmundial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

O Despertar II✨️®️👽🛸👮‍♂️
@odespertarreserva · 26,231
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Matrix Mundial” (@matrixmundial), 9,218 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matrixmundial.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.