Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ماتریوشکا

Channel

ماتریوشکا

@matryshka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

137subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437105210
TypeChannel
Username@matryshka
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/matryshka

Growth

1351371367 September 2026 — 135 subscribers9 September 2026 — 135 subscribers17 September 2026 — 137 subscribers7 September 202617 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 135–137 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:41137+2
9 Sept 2026, 15:23135no change
7 Sept 2026, 05:17135first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.3%
avg views ÷ 137 subscribers
Avg views / post
95.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held20 (7 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total95
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢3239.5%
🤝1721.0%
🤯1316.0%
1012.3%
😁89.88%
🥰11.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 08:03 UTC95 views12 reactionsread 9 September 2026

یعنی لاریجانی اینقدر بد بود که اون رد صلاحیت شد و این مردک نه؟ دقیقا چه فاکتوری از صلاحیت رو توش دیدن؟

😢11🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC200 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @laghviaatt

آیا شهادت شهید رجب زاده مثل قضیه مهسا امینی باعث واکنش سران قوا می شود آیا دولت اندازه فیلتر سایت فردوسی پور واکنش نشان می دهد ؟

😢10

28 Jul 2026, 05:23 UTC310 viewsread 9 September 2026

دیروز بعد مدت‌ها رفتم تجمع میدون نبوت. حتی یک نفر هم پلاکارد نداشت و خیلی عجیب بود. هنوزم اگه یکی پلاکارد ببره نیروهای امنیتی میان میبرنش؟ فکر می‌کردم مسئله حل شده باشه که دیگه جایی اعتراضی ندیده بودم.

20 Jul 2026, 18:56 UTC395 views13 reactionsread 9 September 2026

امشب وسط حرف‌ها درباره جنگ یه خاطره‌ای یادمون افتاد. خانومه هست که سخنگوی دولته و خیلی رو مخه، تو شعبه ما صندوق امانات داره. بعد اون روزهای اول جنگ اومد خالی کرد برد. ما اینجوری بودیم که اگه اینقدر خطرناکه چرا ما رو مجبور کردید شیفتی بیاییم. ارزش جون ما از طلاهای خانوم تو طبقه منفی دو کم‌تره؟

🤯13

17 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC397 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026

عجیب نیست آدم‌هایی که خیلی‌هاشون حتی هیئت هفتگی هم میرن اینقدر غلیظ نصرت خدا رو وابسته با امور مادی اونم در همون لحظه بدونن و فکر کنن خدا قراره مثل یه غول چراغ جادو هر توقعی که داشتن رو برآورده کنه وگرنه یا اسلام حق نیست یا زور شیاطین بیشتره؟ خب وسط خاله خوش تعریف بازی و ظرف شستن و بیسیم زدن و اینجور کارها یکم هم گوش می‌دادید شاید سخنران یه نکاتی هم درباره اینکه امام شهید شد و پیروزی در لحظه نیومد می‌گفت همونجا از اس

10

15 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC366 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026

اگر بله پس چرا واکنش متناسب باهاش دیده نمی‌شه؟

😢3

15 Jul 2026, 07:50 UTC333 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026

اومدن تو اداره خون بگیرن. یعنی اوضاع جنوب اینقدر خرابه؟

😢2

14 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC311 views4 reactionsread 9 September 2026

مثلا چون داریم وقت می‌خریم اجازه می‌دیم قایق بدون سرنشین انتحاری بیاد اسکله‌مون رو نابود کنه و با فیلمش احساس تحقیر و خجالت داشته باشیم؟ چجور وقت خریدنی نتیجه‌اش از دست رفتن دارایی‌هاییه که جبران‌شون سخت مایل به غیرممکنه؟ اونم تو این شرایط. تازه این رو علنی کردن. چه چیزهایی رو ما خبر نداریم خدا عالمه.

😢4

14 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC270 views3 reactionsread 9 September 2026

یجوری نمی‌فهمم چرا تو این دور جنگ یکی میزنیم صدتا می‌خوریم که دیگه حال اعتراض هم ندارم و سر شدم. با فرض اینکه واقعا امکانات هم نداریم باز هم اون توان باقی مونده رو نگه داشتیم واسه وارث؟ به چه امیدی؟ درک نمی‌کنم.

😢2🤝1

14 Jul 2026, 05:22 UTC212 views2 reactionsread 9 September 2026

این تلفن یه روز منو دیوانه می‌کنه. طرف زنگ زده می‌گه گوشی رو بده آقای مرتضایی. می‌گم نداریم می‌گه مگه اونجا بانک نیست. می‌گم با کدوم دایره یا شعبه کار دارید می‌گه نمی‌دونم شما نمی‌دونید آقای مرتضایی کجاست؟ مگه همکارتون نیست. لامذهب ما نزدیک چهل هزار نفر کارمند داریم. مگه من همه رو می‌شناسم؟ ایشالا که این مدل آدم‌ها که هر روز حداقل هفت هشت تا ازشون زنگ می‌زنن قصد شوخی و اذیت دارن. اگه جدی باشن یکم ترسناک می‌شه.

😁2

13 Jul 2026, 19:30 UTC160 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026

فکر کن همزمان با جنگ و استرسش باید همکارهایی که ازشون بدت میاد رو هم ببینی. حداقل سر جنگ قبلی فقط قوم الظالمین در صحنه حضور داشتن.

🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @matryshka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کتاب های دوست داشتنی من
@nazaninenshaei · 30,744
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ماتریوشکا” (@matryshka), 137 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/matryshka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.