Posted without readable text
❤11🔥2

Channel
@mattrop_ru
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,508subscribers
+1,295 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001629585416 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mattrop_ru |
| Description | Онлайн-кружок по Математике Для 1–5 классов. Делаем сложную математику интересной и доступной для каждого ребёнка! Запись идёт весь учебный год ⤵️ mattrop.ru По всем вопросам: @shitheadboss |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mattrop_ru |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:37 | 9,508 | +26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:59 | 9,482 | +138 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:17 | 9,344 | +19 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:15 | 9,325 | +30 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 9,295 | -10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 9,305 | +8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 9,297 | +28 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 9,269 | +25 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 05:55 | 9,244 | +29 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 04:42 | 9,215 | +67 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 9,148 | +22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 9,126 | +88 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 9,038 | +180 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:15 | 8,858 | +127 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 8,731 | +65 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 8,666 | +52 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 8,614 | +105 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:24 | 8,509 | +84 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 8,425 | +72 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 8,353 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (22 July 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,963 |
| Reactions total | 166 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
575 reactions across 42 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 279 | 48.5% | |
| 🔥 | 176 | 30.6% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 8.52% | |
| 🎉 | 24 | 4.17% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 4.00% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 1.74% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 1.39% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 0.696% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.174% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.174% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 575 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 15 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Posted without readable text
❤11🔥2
Я создал бесплатный тренажёр «Состав числа 🔠🔠» 🧩 Лучше всего состав числа 10 запоминается на практике, поэтому в тренажёре собраны разные задания. Ребёнку нужно будет найти пару до десяти, заметить лишнее, заполнить числовой домик, решить пример и найти пропущенное число. Все упражнения короткие, поэтому их удобно проходить каждый день🔠 Забирайте тренажёр в боте ⤵️ t.me/mattrop_bot?start=sostav_10 На занятиях в н…
❤6🔥6👍1
Ура! Я вернул комментарии! 🎉 Буду рад читать ваши вопросы и обсуждения. Сейчас я делаю много новых рабочих листов и интерактивных тренажёров для детей. Если есть тема по математике, которая вызывает у вашего ребёнка трудности или которую хотелось бы подробнее разобрать, напишите об этом в комментариях. Буду учитывать ваши пожелания при создании новых материалов. Также напоминаю, что записаться к нам на занятия можн…
❤4👍4🔥1
Есть 🔠 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 узнать, какие у нас классные занятия: 🔠 Прийти на бесплатное пробное занятие и убедиться лично 🔠 Прочитать отзывы родителей наших учеников, поэтому Делимся некоторыми отзывами в карусели 👆 Учебный год только начался, а мы уже получили столько тёплых сообщений 🥹 Спасибо родителям наших учеников за доверие и добрые слова. Нам очень приятно читать, что детям интересно на занятиях, а преподаватели умею…
❤4👏2🔥2
За какое минимальное количество взвешиваний можно найти фальшивку?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5👍4🔥3
🪙 Сможете найти фальшивую монету? У нас есть 6 монет и чашечные весы. Одна из монет легче остальных. Попробуйте определить, Попробуйте определить, за какое минимальное количество взвешиваний можно найти фальшивку? 🤔 А если хотите, чтобы ребёнок тоже учился рассуждать и решать нестандартные задачи, приглашаем на занятия в «Математические тропинки». Первое пробное занятие бесплатно! #задачи
❤7🔥2😁1
Почему я выбрал именно математику? Уже больше семи лет я занимаюсь развитием математического мышления у детей. Конечно, мне хочется, чтобы ребёнку было легче учиться в школе, чтобы он не терял интерес к математике и чувствовал себя увереннее. Но есть и другие, менее очевидные цели, ради которых я когда-то и решил создать кружок занимательной математики. Для меня математика прежде всего инструмент, с помощью которого…
❤21🤔1
🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 в «Математические тропинки» открыт 🔠 Напоминаем, присоединиться к занятиям можно в течение всего учебного года На уроках мы не учим детей запоминать готовые способы решения. Нам важно, чтобы ребёнок понимал задачу, рассуждал, пробовал разные варианты и не боялся ошибаться Ребята учатся: — замечать закономерности и искать свой путь к ответу; — решать нестандартные логические и олимпиадные задачи; — объяснять х…
❤5🔥3🤩1
Открыть комментарии
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Привет! Это Александр Маркеллов, руководитель «Математических тропинок». Раньше в нашем канале были открыты комментарии. Мне нравилось читать ваши сообщения, обсуждать с вами разные вопросы и получать обратную связь. Но в какой-то момент мы столкнулись с мошенниками. Они писали нашим подписчикам, представлялись менеджерами «Математических тропинок» и предлагали оплатить пробное занятие за 10 000 рублей. Хотя наши …
Какой элементы следующий?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5👍3🔥3
🧩 А вы справитесь с задачей для второклассников? Такую разминку мы даём ребятам на занятиях. А сегодня предлагаем и вам проверить свою внимательность! Посмотрите на последовательность фигур и определите, какой элемент должен быть следующим 👀 Мы приглашаем присоединиться к нашим мини-группам! До осенних каникул ребёнок успеет познакомиться с преподавателем и полноценно включиться в учебу Первое пробное занятие бес…
🔥6❤5🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @mattrop_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@mattrop_ru edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
За какое минимальное количество взвешиваний можно найти фальшивку?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Открыть комментарии
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какой элементы следующий?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какие две конструкции на самом деле одинаковые?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какие числа пропущены?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сколько рыцарей за столом?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Математические тропинки (Mattrop.ru)” (@mattrop_ru), 9,508 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mattrop_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.