Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Макс Абузов | Контент - завод | N8N

Channel

Макс Абузов | Контент - завод | N8N

@maxabuzov

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,418subscribers

-123 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517348392
TypeChannel
Username@maxabuzov
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maxabuzov

Growth

8,4188,5418,479.57 August 2026 — 8,541 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,541 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,537 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,531 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,528 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,521 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,509 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,501 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,478 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,460 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,442 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,418 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 29 days, net -123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,400–8,559 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:568,418-24
1 Sept 2026, 18:548,442-18
29 Aug 2026, 08:088,460-18
25 Aug 2026, 21:288,478-23
22 Aug 2026, 21:448,501-8
19 Aug 2026, 12:278,509-12
16 Aug 2026, 17:068,521-7
13 Aug 2026, 06:188,528-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:078,531-6
7 Aug 2026, 13:558,537-4
7 Aug 2026, 10:458,541no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:378,541first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.25%
avg views ÷ 8,418 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held10 (15 July 202625 August 2026)
Views total189
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2040.0%
🥴1326.0%
😁816.0%
🔥48.00%
36.00%
💯24.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC189 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

😆 Три аналитика, час переписки, и виноват в итоге был только я. Смотрите на скрин. Цифра 1 внизу это сумма охвата за неделю. Цифра 2 это сам период, 17-23 августа. Цифра 3 это охват вот этого конкретного ролика именно за эту неделю, 810 тысяч. А цифра 4 это публикации по нему за ту же неделю. Там ноль. 🤌 810 тысяч охвата и ноль публикаций. Как? Пишу аналитику. Не понимает. Пересылаю второму. Тоже не понимает. Подк

😁3🥴1

7 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC552 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🤌 Вы брали кредит? Там была страховка? Вы ей воспользовались? 😵‍💫 Ну так она и осталась у банка, а можно вернуть. Как это выглядит у тех, кто уже прошёл весь путь. Анастасия, потребительский кредит. Вернули 336 897₽ за 5 дней. Светлана Вдовкина, автокредит. Вернули 161 795₽ за 7 дней. Венера Хлебникова, тоже потребительский. Вернули 97 000₽ за 12 дней. Это реальные кейсы с сайта ребят, не выдумка. ☝🏻 Что нужно сд

👍2🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC489 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

- Пап, сможешь угадать что у меня в руках, на букву А? - Абрикос, апельсин, акула, арбалет? - Не угадал, сдаешься? - Сдаюсь. - Асминог…. - 😶 #вопросотсыночка

😁5🥴4🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC670 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🙄 К сожалению, мы все считаем страховку при кредите обязательной. А оказывается - это не так. Банку просто выгодно её продать. А что деньги можно вернуть, вам никто не скажет. Как раз сейчас делаю контент-завод для ребят (сервиса), который такие возвраты оформляет. Из их статистики: 78% дел заканчиваются деньгами на счету, средний возврат 132 000 рублей. Проверка бесплатная, платят только если деньги реально верну

👍3🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC655 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🔔 Селлеры, если вас задело происходящее на WB, вот куда стоит зайти. Ребята собрали чат пострадавших: уже около 3000 селлеров, у кого потери от 100 тысяч до 2 миллиардов рублей на одного продавца. Что там происходит. 1️⃣ собирают подписи под коллективным обращением в ФАС, Госдуму, ТПП и Минэкономразвития. По одному в такие двери стучаться бесполезно, а две тысячи подписей уже разговор. 2️⃣ и это по делу прямо сей

👍4

29 Jul 2026, 09:52 UTC618 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

А почему только ИНСТ? 🅰️ Ютуб не работает? (вчера спрашивали) Работает, хорошо работает :)

👍2

28 Jul 2026, 13:24 UTC664 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

😉 548 000 просмотров на одном ролике. И 762 просмотра на соседнем. Сейчас объясню, почему это одна и та же история. Начинал я со статики. Картинки, тексты, аккуратные карточки. Делались, выпускались, а охваты выходили такие, что показывать было стыдно. Решил, что ниша не заходит. Дело было не в нише. Со статикой ты каждый раз стреляешь вслепую. Придумал тему, оформил, выложил, получил три сотни просмотров, иногда,

👍52🥴2

27 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC541 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, кто делает какие-то заказы в кворк? Я там создал профиль себе, но нужны отзывы ⭐️ 🌟 💫 🌟 🌟 (компенсирую оплату вам обратно 🤝 в полном объеме) Напишите плиз @max_abuzov

👍2

18 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC947 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Селлеры, какой же это пздц... И ничего же не возместят.... Только склад электростали застрахован, а товары продавцов, к сожалению...

🥴5💯2

15 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,020 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🥴 Не хочу я искать врача по отзывам, по рейтингу, по специализациям…. Уважаемый ИИ, сделай всё за меня плиз… (а то я еще и за рулём, текст наговорю и ок)

👍21🥴1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @maxabuzov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Макс Абузов | Контент - завод | N8N” (@maxabuzov), 8,418 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxabuzov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.