Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Карта математики | Maximatika

Channel

Карта математики | Maximatika

@maximatiks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

627subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002895968557
TypeChannel
Username@maximatiks
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/maximatiks

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

608627617.56 August 2026 — 608 subscribers6 August 2026 — 608 subscribers12 August 2026 — 622 subscribers27 August 2026 — 623 subscribers4 September 2026 — 625 subscribers12 September 2026 — 627 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 605–630 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 02:58627+2
4 Sept 2026, 08:16625+2
27 Aug 2026, 10:12623+1
12 Aug 2026, 20:04622+14
6 Aug 2026, 17:47608no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:37608first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

368 reactions across 18 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11832.1%
🔥6317.1%
👍5715.5%
custom 5330477919586244667308.15%
custom 5438256735150155065308.15%
custom 5332385902972913675236.25%
🥰102.72%
🙏61.63%
🎉51.36%
👾51.36%
🤯41.09%
🕊30.815%
🤓30.815%
🤔30.815%
🍓20.543%
👏20.543%
🤣20.543%
❤‍🔥10.272%
🆒10.272%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 368 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maximatiks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC181 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

5custom 54382567351501550655custom 53304779195862446674❤‍🔥1custom 53323859029729136751

21 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC402 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Третья серия!🎉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxt36WzKZ2E 🎥В прошлых видео мы уже сделали краткий экскурс в аксиоматику Цермело-Френкеля (ZF) и даже посмотрели на некоторые её расширения — с аксиомой выбора (AC) и аксиомой детерминированности (AD). И теперь у нас есть достаточно прочный фундамент, чтобы поговорить о теории множеств подробнее, и как об инструменте и как о самостоятельной дисциплине. Сегодняшний в

🔥10custom 53304779195862446675custom 54382567351501550655custom 53323859029729136754

15 Jul 2026, 07:35 UTC460 views34 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

Вы не просили, но мне втемяшилась эта идея, и я не смог себе отказать! Да и навыки монтажа надо потихоньку совершенствовать. Всё-таки канал называется — карта математики и как бы подразумевает в конце концов эту карту построить (моими темпами я правда не знаю, когда это случится, но всë же 😀). Пока буду анимировать еë по частям в виде заставки к каждому видео (чтобы предварительно осветить — какие связи там появляю

15👍9custom 54382567351501550655custom 53304779195862446673custom 53323859029729136752

6 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC528 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌌МОНИЗМ И ПЛЮРАЛИЗМ ТЕОРИИ МНОЖЕСТВ Часть 2. Фильтры. Продолжение. Итак, мы остановились на том, что хотим сохранить преимущества сетей, оставаясь в рамках языка теории множеств. И как раз здесь на первый план выходят ФИЛЬТРЫ. 🧺 ВТОРОЙ ОТВЕТ: ФИЛЬТРЫ Давайте задумаемся, что на самом деле мы имеем в виду, когда говорим: последовательность, “начиная с некоторого номера” попадает в некоторую область? По сути это

custom 543825673515015506510custom 53304779195862446676custom 533238590297291367553

12 Jun 2026, 12:30 UTC557 views25 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌌МОНИЗМ И ПЛЮРАЛИЗМ ТЕОРИИ МНОЖЕСТВ Часть 2. Фильтры. Начало. Сегодня поговорим о невсемогуществе привычного нам стандартного анализа. Как математика стала работать с пространствами, где привычных нам последовательностей становится недостаточно для описания простого житейского — “всё ближе и ближе”. 🧮 Последовательности: первая тропинка к пределу Уверен, вы знакомы с самым базовыми примерами последовательностей:

🔥12custom 53304779195862446675custom 53323859029729136755👍2custom 54382567351501550651

22 May 2026, 17:41 UTC545 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌌МОНИЗМ И ПЛЮРАЛИЗМ ТЕОРИИ МНОЖЕСТВ Часть 1. Альтернативная история анализа Как мы помним (если не помним, то теперь запомним), изначально теория множеств выросла из проблем анализа. Но какой бы она была, если бы анализ пошёл другим путём? 🧮 От бесконечно малых до пределов Сам анализ зародился в XVII веке и развивался усилиями Ньютона и Лейбница. Они активно пользовались понятиями бесконечно малых, не давая их

9custom 53323859029729136756👍4custom 54382567351501550654custom 53304779195862446673

12 May 2026, 13:22 UTC608 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌌МОНИЗМ И ПЛЮРАЛИЗМ ТЕОРИИ МНОЖЕСТВ Все мы знаем, что теория множеств претендует на роль одного из фундаментальных языков математики. Но почему она имеет именно такую форму? Почему содержит именно такие аксиомы? 🧭 Необходимость или контингентность оснований? Что, если бы мы попали в альтернативную историческую ветку, где математический анализ (напомню - теория множеств исторически выросла во многом из проблем а

12👍8🥰4custom 53304779195862446674🤓3

1 May 2026, 18:15 UTC674 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Какие темы интересуют на канале?

  1. Современные математические идеи73%
  2. Интересные задачки (в первых постах их было побольше)30%
  3. Математико-философские темы67%
  4. Я здесь исключительно ради иллюстраций с курочками17%

The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 May 2026, 18:10 UTC666 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мы с вами уже довольно долгое время вместе. Думаю, пора сЫмитировать демократию и устроить допрос (гарантий, что это на что-то повлияет, как вы понимаете, дать не могу 😉). По крайней мере, в ближайшее время уже наметил снова поговорить о современных идеях. В этот раз — в теории множеств: форсинге, монизме Хью Вудина и плюрализме Джоэла Хэмкинса. Также чуть позже можно будет потихоньку подвязывать к текущим темам о

🔥11👍4🤔3

13 Apr 2026, 16:47 UTC848 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вторая серия!🎉 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdbhCAs5Ivg 🎥В прошлой серии мы в общих чертах описали самую часто используемую систему аксиом теории множеств — Цермело-Френкеля (ZF). Сегодня самое время добавить к ZF буковку C. И поговорить об аксиоме выбора. Наверное самой противоречивой аксиоме после пятого постулата Евклида. Так же затронем, не совместимую с ней аксиому детерминированности (AD) — мостик между

🔥11🥰65

9 Apr 2026, 12:34 UTC743 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданно подкравшийся ремонт сильно затянул создание ролика. Но он вот-вот на подходе!

9🔥7🙏6

8 Apr 2026, 07:34 UTC756 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🕳 ФУНДИРОВАННОСТЬ 🏺Немного предыстории. Помните, мы уже боролись с парадоксами в одном из прошлых видео? Так как долгое время считалось, что большинство так называемых "фундаментальных" семантических и теоретико-множественных парадоксов основаны на самореферентности — главным нашим оружием было составление иерархий. На этой идее основаны иерархия типов Рассела и иерархии языков Тарского. Но в какой-то момент появи

10👍6🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maximatiks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 May 2026, 18:15 UTCAnonymous Poll138 voters

Какие темы интересуют на канале?

  1. Современные математические идеи73%
  2. Интересные задачки (в первых постах их было побольше)30%
  3. Математико-философские темы67%
  4. Я здесь исключительно ради иллюстраций с курочками17%

The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Mar 2026, 11:34 UTCFinal Results40 voters

Обязательна ли самореференция для фундаментальных семантических парадоксов?

  1. Да40%
  2. Нет25%
  3. С Ябло до сих пор всё неоднозначно!33%
  4. Не в моих привычках менять ответ3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2026, 08:26 UTCFinal Results37 voters

Обязательна ли самореференция для фундаментальных семантических парадоксов?

  1. Да41%
  2. Нет24%
  3. С Ябло не всё так однозначно!!!35%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Карта математики | Maximatika” (@maximatiks), 627 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maximatiks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.