Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MaxxPC

Channel

MaxxPC

@maxxpc_ru

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

48,523subscribers

-2,115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002257842321
TypeChannel
Username@maxxpc_ru
DescriptionСобираем компьютеры под заказ Заказать ПК >> @maxxpc_manager Каталог ПК >> @maxxpcshopbot Медиа о ПК >> @mediacomputers Сотрудничество >> @marketing_maxxpcru maxxpc.ru РКН: https://rkn.link/NAc
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/maxxpc_ru

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

48,52350,67649,599.56 August 2026 — 50,638 subscribers7 August 2026 — 50,623 subscribers8 August 2026 — 50,600 subscribers9 August 2026 — 50,564 subscribers10 August 2026 — 50,512 subscribers11 August 2026 — 50,476 subscribers13 August 2026 — 50,458 subscribers14 August 2026 — 50,423 subscribers15 August 2026 — 50,415 subscribers17 August 2026 — 50,408 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,426 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,526 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,639 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,654 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,676 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,665 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,629 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,598 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,559 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,530 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,495 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,468 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,442 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,412 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,371 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,326 subscribers5 September 2026 — 50,280 subscribers8 September 2026 — 50,170 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,100 subscribers13 September 2026 — 50,031 subscribers14 September 2026 — 49,976 subscribers16 September 2026 — 49,924 subscribers18 September 2026 — 49,839 subscribers25 September 2026 — 49,648 subscribers3 October 2026 — 49,388 subscribers8 October 2026 — 49,253 subscribers12 October 2026 — 49,057 subscribers14 October 2026 — 49,016 subscribers15 October 2026 — 48,996 subscribers16 October 2026 — 48,982 subscribers17 October 2026 — 48,947 subscribers18 October 2026 — 48,923 subscribers19 October 2026 — 48,875 subscribers20 October 2026 — 48,818 subscribers21 October 2026 — 48,757 subscribers22 October 2026 — 48,718 subscribers23 October 2026 — 48,669 subscribers24 October 2026 — 48,632 subscribers25 October 2026 — 48,591 subscribers26 October 2026 — 48,564 subscribers27 October 2026 — 48,547 subscribers28 October 2026 — 48,523 subscribers6 August 202628 October 2026
52 measurements spanning 83 days, net -2,115. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,200–50,999 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 19:5948,523-24
27 Oct 2026, 18:0048,547-17
26 Oct 2026, 19:0048,564-27
25 Oct 2026, 22:0048,591-41
24 Oct 2026, 19:4748,632-37
23 Oct 2026, 18:1748,669-49
22 Oct 2026, 17:0648,718-39
21 Oct 2026, 15:4048,757-61
20 Oct 2026, 11:2648,818-57
19 Oct 2026, 12:4548,875-48
18 Oct 2026, 14:0648,923-24
17 Oct 2026, 12:0048,947-35
16 Oct 2026, 09:4648,982-14
15 Oct 2026, 09:3948,996-20
14 Oct 2026, 12:5949,016-41
12 Oct 2026, 22:0949,057-196
8 Oct 2026, 10:3649,253-135
3 Oct 2026, 19:5749,388-260
25 Sept 2026, 00:1649,648-191
18 Sept 2026, 18:2249,839first reading

Engagement

228 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.21%
avg views ÷ 48,523 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,500
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.837%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
79
of 228 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held228 (3 August 2026 – 28 October 2026)
Views total276,530
Reactions total2,315
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Oct 2026, 23:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,540
Videos
≈427
Links
≈1,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
39m 57s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 74 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,417 reactions across 228 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,78137.5%
❤1,83924.8%
🔥88211.9%
🤨7169.65%
custom 52489560730538204954666.28%
😁3444.64%
🥰2202.97%
😍1692.28%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 228 of the 228 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 228 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 228 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @maxxpc_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 228 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Oct 2026, 16:23 UTC≈1,040 views17 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Forwarded from @MediaComputersPhoto

Стартовала раздача Doom 2016 — на сайте Lenovo раздадут 10.000 ключей // Отправляем друзьям и успеваем забрать — здесь @MediaComputers

👍11🔥2custom 52489560730538204952❤1😍1

28 Oct 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,980 views14 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

✨ Собрали подборку отзывов от тех, кто уже получил свой ПК Спасибо, что делитесь впечатлениями, рассказываете о своем опыте и доверяете нам сборку своих компьютеров Спасибо, что выбираете нас! Больше отзывов — «Обсуждения»! #отзывыMAXXPC

❤7👍4🔥1🥰1😍1

28 Oct 2026, 09:55 UTC≈2,150 views13 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🖥 Монитор под видеокарту: как выбрать и не переплатить 🔴 В первую очередь смотрим на разрешение Full HD требует от видеокарты меньше ресурсов, 2K заметно больше, а 4K уже рассчитан на производительное железо, особенно в тяжелых играх 🔴 Потом — частота обновления Для сюжетных игр зачастую нет смысла гнаться за экстремальными значениями, а вот в соревновательных проектах высокая герцовка действительно важна 🔴Также с…

❤6👍4🔥1😍1custom 52489560730538204951

27 Oct 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,870 views22 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Forwarded from @MediaComputersVideo

Apple представила новые MacBook Pro и iMac с чипом M6 — предзаказы стартуют 28 октября Подробности: 🔴12-ядерный CPU и 12-ядерный GPU 🔴Процессор работает на 30% быстрее прошлого поколения M5 🔴16 ГБ памяти в минимальной комплектации, а максимум 32 ГБ 🔴Будет модуль Wi-Fi 7 и автономность до 24 часов За 14-дюймовый MacBook Pro на M6 придётся отдать от $1999 (161.000₽) @MediaComputers

👍16custom 52489560730538204953❤2🔥1

27 Oct 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,710 views26 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🔥 Новая сборка отправилась в Ростов-на-Дону Ryzen 9 9950X с 16 ядрами под ресурсоемкие задачи, в пару к нему поставили RTX 5070 Ti с 16 ГБ GDDR7 🔴 CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 🔴 GPU: RTX 5070 Ti 16GB GDDR7 🔴 RAM: 64GB DDR5 6000MHz 🔴 MB: ASRock B850 Pro-A 🔴 Cooling: DEEPCOOL LM360 ARGB 🔴 SSD M2: MSI SPATIUM M461 2TB 🔴 PSU: DeepCool PQ850G 850W, 80+ Gold 🔴 Case: LIAN LI LANCOOL 216 Black На все сборки действует гарантия и…

🔥16❤4🥰2custom 52489560730538204952🤨1😍1

27 Oct 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,870 views24 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🎮 Хочу играть в 2K, могу потратить 150 000 ₽ Что реально собрать за такой бюджет? ➡️ если основная задача — игры, большую часть бюджета логично направить в видеокарту, а остальные компоненты подобрать так, чтобы не создавать перекоса Что можно получить за 150 000 ₽: ➡️ актуальную платформу, 32 ГБ оперативной памяти, SSD на 1 ТБ и видеокарту, рассчитанную на комфортный 2K-гейминг А если немного доплатить? ➡️ дополн…

❤14👍3😁3🔥1🥰1😍1custom 52489560730538204951

27 Oct 2026, 07:15 UTC≈3,100 views28 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Poll

❓ Есть 150 000 ₽ на ПК для 2K. Куда вложить основную часть бюджета?

  1. 🎮 В видеокарту — она рисует картинку55%
  2. 🧠 В процессор — чтобы не было узких мест23%
  3. 🖥️ В красивый корпус и RGB — чтобы радовало глаз5%
  4. ⚖️ Равномерно на всё48%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍20😁4❤2🔥1🥰1

26 Oct 2026, 14:32 UTC≈2,650 views163 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Forwarded from @MediaComputersPhoto

6️⃣ РОЗЫГРЫШ ИГРОВОГО ПК «GTA VI» + 50 призов Подарим одному из подписчиков Игровой ПК в стиле GTA 6 + 50 призов, а именно: 1 место — Игровой ПК (RTX 5060 + 32 ГБ ОЗУ) 2 место — DeepCool LT360 VISION 3 место — DeepCool SPARTACUS 360 4 место — DeepCool AK700 VC 5 место — DeepCool AK620 G2 6 место — DeepCool AK400 G2 NYX 7 место — DeepCool AK400 G2 8–15 места — 3000 Купикоинов 16–31 места — 1000 Купикоинов 32–51 мест…

👍105🔥28🤨16❤9custom 52489560730538204955

26 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,320 views16 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

🤲🏻 На связи на каждом этапе Спасибо Ивану за доверие и обратную связь! Больше отзывов — «Обсуждения»! #отзывыMAXXPC

👍13🔥1🥰1custom 52489560730538204951

26 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC≈3,280 views15 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Video

👀 Кто заметил, что мы собираем? В сегодняшнем видео мельком показали одну интересную сборку из нашего цеха, совсем скоро покажем этот ПК поближе и расскажем, что у него внутри А пока проверим вашу насмотренность: как думаете, сколько стоит эта сборка? Пишите свои варианты в комментариях 🔧 А если хочешь, чтобы твой ПК собрали здесь — напиши менеджеру. Подберем конфиг под твои задачи и бесплатно доставим по всей Рос…

👍11❤2🔥1🥰1

25 Oct 2026, 12:04 UTC≈17,800 views30 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⚡️ Прокачаем твой ПК бесплатно вместе с 4FAN Твой компьютер давно просит апгрейда? Вместе с 4FAN подарим вторую жизнь старому или проблемному ПК одного из подписчиков Поставим новое мощное железо, соберём, протестируем и вернём компьютер владельцу полностью за наш счет! Как участвовать: 🔴Подпишись на канал 4FAN 🔴Пришли фото/видео своего ПК 🔴Расскажи, почему именно тебе нужен апгрейд (можно подать заявку за друга) …

👍20🔥6❤3🥰1

25 Oct 2026, 10:40 UTC≈3,160 views19 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

⚙️ Железный ребус Зашифровали слово в эмодзи: 🕹️ + 🧪 + 🔢 ⬇️ Пишите свои версии в комментариях @maxxpc_ru

👍16❤1🔥1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 228 posts we hold for @maxxpc_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Oct 2026, 07:15 UTCAnonymous Poll1,000 voters approx.

❓ Есть 150 000 ₽ на ПК для 2K. Куда вложить основную часть бюджета?

  1. 🎮 В видеокарту — она рисует картинку55%
  2. 🧠 В процессор — чтобы не было узких мест23%
  3. 🖥️ В красивый корпус и RGB — чтобы радовало глаз5%
  4. ⚖️ Равномерно на всё48%

The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Oct 2026, 04:23 UTCAnonymous Poll1,000 voters approx.

❓ Как думаешь, твой ПК переживёт выход GTA 6?

  1. Мой комп даже GTA 5 на минималках еле тянет16%
  2. Придётся апгрейдиться, но я ещё не готов21%
  3. Уверен, что мой ПК справится, я его недавно обновил55%
  4. Уже коплю на новый ПК13%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Oct 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Poll548 voters

Сталкивались ли вы с тем, что компьютер сам уходит в перезагрузку?

  1. Да, из-за перегрева15%
  2. Да, был виноват блок питания10%
  3. Да, после обновления Windows или драйверов24%
  4. Никогда не было61%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Oct 2026, 08:30 UTCAnonymous Poll623 voters

Сталкивались ли вы с потерей данных из-за сбоя SSD?

  1. Дааа, это было ужасно11%
  2. Да, но быстро разобрался6%
  3. Нет85%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTCAnonymous Poll668 voters

❓ Сталкивались ли вы с тем, что новый ПК работает медленнее старого?

  1. Да, и я так и не понял, в чём было дело12%
  2. Да, но потом разобрался и исправил10%
  3. Нет, у меня новый сразу летает57%
  4. У меня не было нового ПК, только старый28%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTCAnonymous Poll1,130 voters approx.

В каком разрешении чаще всего играешь?

  1. Full HD56%
  2. 2K41%
  3. 4K7%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 228 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MaxxPC” (@maxxpc_ru), 48,523 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maxxpc_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.