Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MBaks Crypto

Channel

MBaks Crypto

@mbaks_crypto

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

24,840subscribers

-572 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001598222778
TypeChannel
Username@mbaks_crypto
DescriptionТрейдинг криптовалют в режиме реального времени. Торговые идеи и актуальные новости по рынку. Мой личный дневник сделок Больше полезных ссылок найдёте на http://mbaks.ru/
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mbaks_crypto

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,84025,41225,1266 August 2026 — 25,412 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,412 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,406 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,398 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,393 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,385 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,368 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,351 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,343 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,332 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,336 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,328 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,318 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,300 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,293 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,269 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,273 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,276 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,268 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,263 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,255 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,253 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,240 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,234 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,233 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,227 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,216 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,201 subscribers8 September 2026 — 25,173 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,149 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,133 subscribers14 September 2026 — 25,130 subscribers16 September 2026 — 25,116 subscribers18 September 2026 — 25,102 subscribers24 September 2026 — 25,062 subscribers3 October 2026 — 25,006 subscribers8 October 2026 — 24,968 subscribers12 October 2026 — 24,925 subscribers14 October 2026 — 24,915 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,907 subscribers16 October 2026 — 24,898 subscribers17 October 2026 — 24,889 subscribers18 October 2026 — 24,885 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,879 subscribers20 October 2026 — 24,866 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,857 subscribers22 October 2026 — 24,851 subscribers23 October 2026 — 24,840 subscribers6 August 202623 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 79 days, net -572. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,754–25,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Oct 2026, 15:2524,840-11
22 Oct 2026, 15:4924,851-6
21 Oct 2026, 13:3024,857-9
20 Oct 2026, 08:1524,866-13
19 Oct 2026, 06:3624,879-6
18 Oct 2026, 05:3024,885-4
17 Oct 2026, 06:3524,889-9
16 Oct 2026, 05:2724,898-9
15 Oct 2026, 07:0524,907-8
14 Oct 2026, 08:2924,915-10
12 Oct 2026, 18:0024,925-43
8 Oct 2026, 06:0224,968-38
3 Oct 2026, 15:1825,006-56
24 Sept 2026, 20:4125,062-40
18 Sept 2026, 19:5525,102-14
16 Sept 2026, 13:4125,116-14
14 Sept 2026, 15:1725,130-3
13 Sept 2026, 01:3725,133-16
11 Sept 2026, 04:1625,149-24
8 Sept 2026, 09:4125,173first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 24,840 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,740
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026
Posts held29 (4 July 2026 – 9 October 2026)
Views total58,440
Reactions total1,758
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Oct 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,920
Videos
≈154
Links
≈282

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,848 reactions across 29 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,42941.5%
👍1,55126.5%
🔥97916.7%
😁2494.26%
🐳1091.86%
😭941.61%
👌490.838%
🥱350.598%
⚡340.581%
❤‍🔥310.53%
🏆310.53%
🫡290.496%
🤔260.445%
🆒220.376%
😨220.376%
😱210.359%
🤣190.325%
😍170.291%
🍌140.239%
🥰90.154%
20 further kinds781.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,848 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
125
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 29 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
52
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mbaks_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 9 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Oct 2026, 20:10 UTC≈6,950 views148 reactions3 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

А я думал будет бычка

😭84😁32👍21🤣3🥱3🐳2💊2❤1

5 Oct 2026, 14:09 UTC≈11,400 views174 reactions2 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Тут же у нас не только про трейдинг и рыбалку, но и вообще на любую тему, на которую есть желание поделиться. Дневник все таки, выговориться могу себе и может полезно/интересно узнать будет Вам Торговать на бинансе я начал почти с момента запуска (и даже с учетом что он не работал в РБ временно), но видео, если верить клоду, начали выходить с его хоть каким-то упоминанием с 2019. Опять же, если верить клоду, то 80% …

❤105👍35😱15🔥6😐6⚡2👏2🐳1

5 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTC≈8,030 views78 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Poll

Ничего себе Вы бахнули реакций. А Вы что думаете?

  1. 15к$42%
  2. 150к$28%
  3. 500-600к$16%
  4. 1.5млн.$7%
  5. 3-4млн.$4%
  6. 15 млн.$4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁64🏆7🐳4🤔2🫡1

5 Oct 2026, 13:00 UTC≈6,860 views911 reactions7 Starsread 23 October 2026

Че, интересно скок рефка бинанса принесла мне за время и сколько приносит сейчас? Я же рефовод) Давайте хотя бы 300 реакций

❤617👍172🐳80😁17🔥8✍5☃4🍌3

1 Oct 2026, 10:41 UTC≈10,500 views275 reactions4 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Балдею

❤151🔥67😁20👍16⚡11👏4🥱3🦄3

24 Sept 2026, 16:58 UTC≈14,700 views172 reactions3 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Пора и торговать

👍95🔥49❤13🐳6😁5🥱4

23 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC≈13,500 views223 reactions4 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Заказы идут, торговать (сливать) некогда. Работников найти не могу, делаю сам Так шо такие дела. Творчество)

❤106👍83🔥17🥱9🆒4🐳2🕊2

23 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTC≈21,900 views87 reactions1 Starread 23 October 2026
Photo

В MBS.CAB уже более 1000 активных пользователей🔥 Сегодня впервые столкнулись с тем, что сервер перегрузился Скринер MBS.CAB - https://mbs.cab/ А ведь пока там все прям в демке и уже к концу сентября, надеюсь, выйдут обновления, которые значительно улучшат все аспекты

❤67🔥14🎉4😱2

21 Sept 2026, 12:40 UTC≈10,300 views176 reactions1 Starread 23 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤86👍46😍17❤‍🔥8😁8🔥6🥰2👀1

21 Sept 2026, 01:35 UTC≈10,500 views97 reactions1 Starread 23 October 2026
Photo

Снова не дали, пошли на ре-тест, решил выйти, снова не то что нужно

👍69❤14🔥7🥱7

11 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC≈13,700 views102 reactions1 Starread 23 October 2026
Photo

Эх ты сука, не дали постоять

❤48🔥31🫡21☃2

11 Sept 2026, 11:43 UTC≈12,600 views344 reactions52 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Это лето провел в настоящей жизни, если так можно сказать За 3 месяца около 15000 км накатал. Рыбачил, наслаждался природой, сливался с бесконечно вечным:)) Изредка торговал, но при этом делал это точечно и не напрягаясь, в целом даже получалось закрывать месяца лучше ожидаемого База работает, лето рекорд по загрузке. Выиграл аукцион на новую землю для расширения, но цена была неадекватной и пришлось временно скип…

❤204👍89🔥37🐳4🆒4❤‍🔥2🕊2🫡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @mbaks_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Oct 2026, 13:55 UTCAnonymous Poll2,280 voters approx.

Ничего себе Вы бахнули реакций. А Вы что думаете?

  1. 15к$42%
  2. 150к$28%
  3. 500-600к$16%
  4. 1.5млн.$7%
  5. 3-4млн.$4%
  6. 15 млн.$4%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 9 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MBaks Crypto” (@mbaks_crypto), 24,840 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mbaks_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.