Channel
@mdjsj8
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
34,560subscribers
+33,872 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001443417291 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @m22222 @mdjsj8 |
| Description | #马达加斯加 #马达加斯加大事件 #马达加斯加交流群 #马达加斯加华人 #马达加斯加新闻 🇲🇬 马达加斯加大事件 专注马达加斯加华人新闻、突发资讯、社会动态 📡 第一时间更新 📰 本地资讯 / 国际要闻 / 华人热点 投稿 @bx166 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mdjsj8 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 34,560 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 34,560 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 34,562 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:12 | 34,562 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 34,564 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:09 | 34,564 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 34,571 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 34,571 | +1,800 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 32,771 | no change |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 32,771 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 32,768 | no change |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 32,768 | +32,080 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 688 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 688 | first reading |
257 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 257 (25 July 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,120 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 257 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 257 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#吉隆坡圈内爆料：软饭男教练婚内出轨00后，抛妻弃子细节被扒，第三者身份遭起底 劲爆消息！吉隆坡一位健身教练张证雄被曝长期靠妻子供养，不仅吃穿用度全由老婆买单，还变着花样找妻子伸手要钱，结果转头就抛下原配和年幼孩子，与一名00后女子Wei Ying发展出不伦关系。更离谱的是，这位第三者明知对方已有家室，仍执意介入。 目前原配已公开表态，两人正在走离婚程序，并郑重声明：今后张证雄不得再以她名义借款或赊账，其个人及生意上的所有债务，与她毫无关系。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#老挝资讯：博胶省重拳整治金三角经济特区电诈窝点 博胶省近期持续加强针对金三角经济特区电信诈骗呼叫中心的清理行动。截至当前，执法部门已开展9轮突击检查，取缔267个窝点，并抓获来自16个不同国家的涉案人员。 金三角经济特区安全指挥部负责人阿努辛·萨帕塞上校透露，依据党中央及公安部的统一部署，反诈清查行动已取得阶段性成果，当局承诺将坚决杜绝此类非法活动在特区内继续存在。 据悉，涉案的中国籍及越南籍人员目前已依法遣送回国。其余外籍嫌疑人，有关部门正与相关国家驻老挝使领馆协作，办理手续并安排其返回各自国家。涉案老挝公民则经教育训诫并签署书面保证后，方被释放。 去年8月起，博胶省进一步升级打击力度，专门组建了一支由250名区级官员及网络安全专家组成的联合工作组，针对金三角经济特区内的4个重点片区展开常态化排查与清剿。 接下来，博胶省将继续与区域内外合作伙伴保持密切协作，联合应对跨境网络诈骗等犯罪活动，全力维护金三角经济特区的安…
#群友爆料：西港赢家“出码”团队再惹争议，多名赌客自称赢钱难脱身 据知情群友透露，其弟弟近日在西港“赢家”赌场通过“出码”方式下注，赢了5000元后却被拒退码，对方反复进行“思想工作”，直到输光才放人离开。该群友的朋友随后前往该赌场，遭遇如出一辙。 爆料人称，当前西港正严打赌博，赢家老板却仍纵容这些“出码”人员在场内活动，令人费解。他承认拿码赌博有错，但赢了钱想走却走不了。后有朋友支招，称只要赢了不让走就报警，警方一来对方必定放人。 据称，这几名“出码”人员均来自河南，长期驻扎赢家赌场。爆料人表示，如今西港环境竞争激烈，自己原本只想赚点生活费，反遭对方恐吓，并放话“出门小心”。他同时呼吁所有前往赢家拿码的赌客，若输了就报警，对方必定放行，并劝告大家不要再踏足赢家。 爆料人还表示，若再遇到类似情况，将公布这几名河南籍人员的照片，并直接上传至抖音等平台，曝光其行径。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx1
柬埔寨外交部官员因向“盘总”售卖C类签证被收监 柬埔寨反贪局今日发布通报，该局联合外交部及内政部，对一宗与跨境网络诈骗相关的严重腐败案展开行动。涉案的柬埔寨外交部官员托萨朗及其两名同伙已于8月23日遭移送法办，并已被法院下令羁押。 反贪局称，托萨朗在调查过程中供认，其非法窃取并使用超过6000张C类及Cex类签证纸，并主要批量提供给在柬埔寨活动的外籍网络诈骗分子。 调查还显示，托萨朗及其同伙通过上述不法活动，累计获取超过300万美元的非法所得。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#园区内幕爆料：某园区一区食堂3楼1号办公室，年前整体迁至72号路7号公寓继续运作。该公寓实际控制人为“玲姐”，现场主管“阿涛”（真名谢浩），两人均为重庆籍，阿涛目前人在国内。 据爆料人反映，该公司长期拖欠员工工资及业绩提成，管理层集体失联。爆料人表示，前期业绩不佳属于个人能力问题，无可怨言；但后期已做出实际业绩，公司却仍迟迟不发薪资，明显是公司方面的责任。 更令人愤怒的是，公司曾谎称已“打点好关系”，结果员工全部被抓，白白拘留半个多月，最终分文未得被遣送回国。如今回国已数月，公司既无任何回应，拖欠的工资与提成也始终未结。 爆料人称，若帖子发出后仍无人主动联系处理，他将进一步公开更多内幕信息。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#群友来稿：2024年，我们在KK相识。那一晚我还只是个底层小代理，包厢里的一个照面，我就彻底沦陷了——心里只有一个念头：她必须是我的。 那晚气氛很轻松，散场后我们互加了Telegram。她出乎意料地主动，每天消息不断。渐渐地，我也一步步陷了进去。我开始为她花钱，名牌包、新手机，连她家里的难处我也一并出面解决。没过多久，我们就搬到一起住了。 之后公司搬迁到金边，我们这段关系也从那里继续延伸。那时我已经做到了总代，手头宽裕了很多。她回了国，我便在国内给她置办各种实物。说真的，那段时间我以为自己遇到了对的人。 等她真正回国，一个消息像雷一样砸在我头上：她孩子都已经4岁了，而且她老公早就出了轨。 听到这件事的瞬间，我说不清自己心里是什么滋味。等于说，我白养了别人家的孩子整整两年。 后来我摊牌，逼问她。她只轻飘飘回了一句："当初是你自己愿意的，我能有什么办法？" 现在回头看，这两年她陪我走完从低谷到高处的全程，结果全是谎言…
#知情者爆料：缅北嘎里码头半山腰一处电诈园区，幕后老板绰号“秋哥”，园区主管代号“高兴”，团队负责人叫“阿豪” 据逃出该园区的知情者透露，园区内目前仍关押着近百名被困人员，其本人侥幸脱身后决定公开内幕。该知情者表示，下一步会逐步曝光具体位置信息，园区管理层手段极其狠辣，多名受害者已濒临崩溃。其宣称将主动向公安机关投案自首，并配合调查，把园区内所有作案手法和迫害细节逐一交代。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
#内部投稿#：代团队发声，相信不少埋头实干的同事都有同感——当前部门与开云招聘体系下，确实存在一些不容回避的问题。 管理层长期缺位、遇事躲闪，正把一批批真正干活的人逼走。我说出这些心声，相信许多从事招聘的同事都能共鸣，也料到会有不同声音出来辩护。 公司天天讲“以人为本”，可落到现实却更像一句空话。眼下业绩不理想，管理层很少从自身找原因，部门里反倒有不少靠关系混日子、拿薪水不干活的人。招聘机制越来越僵，用人门槛越抬越高，福利却在不断缩水。 我运气不差，进了一个氛围融洽的团队，遇上愿意真心带人的上级，确实学到不少东西。但眼看着上级拼死拼活，却得不到应有的认可，心里实在替他不值。 现在的任务分配，怎么看都透着古怪。每月指标压得我们整组喘不过气。有的小组十几个人，月度只安排 3‑5 项任务；而只有四五个人的小组，居然要扛10个任务。十人大组分4个任务，人均产出仅0.4；五人小组接10个任务，人均产出直接拉到2。实在搞不懂部门管理…
#群友热评：为何当下越来越多中国男性倾向选择越南女孩？ 【中国女孩：优势与隐忧】 1、要说中国女孩的好处，最直观的就是沟通无障碍，但真正愿意交心的却寥寥无几。更现实的风险在于——一旦发生意外怀孕，或你觉得她的情绪需求没被满足，她可能会毫不客气地把你所有隐私信息统统留存，当成分手后的“谈判筹码”。翻翻东南亚新闻，中国女孩涉嫌勒索的案件并不少见。 2、中国女孩太擅长“拿捏人心”了，而且消费水平也高——化妆品、护肤品、金银首饰、腕表包包，一样都不能少。更累的是，你不仅要为赚钱绞尽脑汁，还得时刻照顾她的情绪，这让我们这些在异乡打拼的中国男人，身心俱疲。 3、所谓“日久生情”，哪怕最初只是包养关系，时间久了，同床共枕，很多男人也会想着真心相待。可对方却始终把你当提款机，当成一桩交易，这段关系自然走不下去。这也是为什么越来越多中国男人，选择对中国女孩“敬而远之”。 【越南女孩：传统与现代的平衡】 1、越南文化深受儒家思想影响，加上传…
#受害者控诉：缅东三佛塔附近“瀑布”电诈园区内部揭秘，坐标：15.233577°N，98.181230°E 据知情人士透露，该园区内设有两家诈骗公司，分别为“远程集团”与“瑞丰集团”。远程集团的实际控制人被称为“二哥”，大管人员外号“佑东”；瑞丰集团则由外号“大圣”的老板掌管，管理层包括“小美”“火箭”“阿雷”“老爪”等人。两个团伙在同一地点运作，园区内关押约700人，主要针对境内民众实施“杀猪盘”诈骗及婚恋交友类犯罪。其中，“老爪”涉嫌专门从事人口贩卖，负责从边境接运受害者入园。 受害者描述，远程集团管理层近期从柬埔寨调任而来，手段极其残暴。据控诉，该管理到任后对园区内被拘禁人员进行非人折磨，包括用铁器砸击手指、实施水刑（将人固定后蒙面灌水）、吊挂殴打、使用钢管及木棍施暴。受害者每日仅休息不足三小时，凌晨两点收工，早五时即被强迫继续工作。因疲劳或业绩不达标，会被铐住双手吊起一整日，期间遭拳打脚踢。更有甚者，部分未开单人员被…
#网民爆料：柬埔寨灰产圈乱象丛生，从业者直呼“太难了” 一位自称长期从事体育盘口的业内人士近日发帖吐槽，称自己在柬埔寨打拼多年，原本以为体育盘算是灰产链条中相对靠谱的环节，结果还是遇到了一连串令人瞠目结舌的奇葩事件，直呼“恶心到令人发指”。 奇葩案例一：借钱容易见人难。一位经朋友介绍来求职的“准员工”，声称身无分文、没有护照，还染有毒瘾。入职前以各种理由陆续借走800美金，每次50、100地借，问何时能来上班，对方直接失联。 奇葩案例二：偷渡入境，才干半天就跑路。同样是没有护照、身无分文的“求职者”，通过偷渡方式进入柬埔寨，到岗仅几个小时便不辞而别，连招呼都没打一声。 奇葩案例三：第一天上班就狮子大开口。一位没有护照、没有积蓄的新人，入职当天竟要求预支1000美金工资，让老板哭笑不得：“我怕是得先去买台印钞机才供得起。” 奇葩案例四：有护照却超期滞留三年半，业绩惨淡还消耗巨大。一位员工签证逾期长达42个月，工作三个月仅…
#员工爆料：对开云集团彻底失望，勤恳老员工反被优先裁员 据员工反映，开云集团近期裁员动作引发内部不满。有自称入职两年的员工吐槽，本月业绩未达标便被直接辞退，世界杯热潮一结束就立即“清人”。更令人不解的是，那些连续三个月没有业绩的人反而能继续留在公司，疑似有人本就是冲着长期签证来的，私下早已在泰国另谋职业。该员工感叹，这么大一家集团，如今竟被各种关系户拖垮，实在令人唏嘘。 关注马达加斯加大事件👉 @M22222 投稿👉 @bx166
Showing the 12 most recent of 257 posts we hold for @mdjsj8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,479,102 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“马达加斯加大事件 西港日记 亚太新闻 柬埔寨大事件” (@mdjsj8), 34,560 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdjsj8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.