#网友投稿:最新缅甸大型电诈集团转移到拿马山(Nat Ma Taung) 16号至18号从缅甸孟包及其周边地区持续武装转移超七百人以上的电诈集团员工到了拿马山 这七百多人中有超过一半以上都是今年从各地骗招和买进来的,包括有不久前从中国国内被骗来缅甸后失踪至今未找到的人,可以从这里入手去找找。 武装押送转移路上几乎没有人敢逃跑,盘总和武装头子下令对于逃跑的人可以直接开枪打死。 里面和园区一样虐待毒打员工,没收员工的一切私人物品,电刑鞭刑关水牢强奸剁手脚指等应有尽有。 大家千万要记住远离这个地方叫拿马山,不出意外的话电诈集团还会从缅甸边境各地转移人到这里来。 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料 : @fage1415 找对象 文案 :@cpdd0000

Channel
缅甸人民日报🇲🇲
@mdrmrb1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,270subscribers
-6,405 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002223746638 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mdrmrb1 |
| Description | 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People’s Daily 📰 聚焦缅甸 · 放眼东南亚 · 关注世界 第一时间发布: • 🇲🇲 缅甸新闻 • 🌏 国际资讯 • 💹 财经动态 • ⚡️ 突发事件 📮 新闻线索:@fage1415 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 42 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mdrmrb1 |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:51 | 42,270 | -41 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:11 | 42,311 | -60 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 11:38 | 42,371 | -53 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:58 | 42,424 | -55 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:50 | 42,479 | -57 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 05:00 | 42,536 | -184 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 42,720 | -240 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 17:18 | 42,960 | -237 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 43,197 | -416 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:15 | 43,613 | -120 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 43,733 | -106 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 43,839 | -135 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 43,974 | -255 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 44,229 | -208 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 44,437 | -120 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:42 | 44,557 | -77 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:53 | 44,634 | -95 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 44,729 | -63 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 44,792 | -37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:49 | 44,829 | first reading |
Engagement
1,570 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 139 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.70%
- avg views ÷ 42,270 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 720
- 656 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.162%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 657
- of 1,570 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 202 of 656 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,570 (7 August 2026 – 18 October 2026) |
| Views total | 472,377 |
| Reactions total | 256 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Oct 2026, 15:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈43,200
- Videos
- ≈7,180
- Links
- ≈20,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2h 15m
- Average length
- 36s
Measured directly from 227 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,420 reactions across 253 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 6,093 | 82.1% | |
| ❤ | 189 | 2.55% | |
| 👎 | 112 | 1.51% | |
| 💔 | 102 | 1.37% | |
| 🤮 | 98 | 1.32% | |
| 🥱 | 95 | 1.28% | |
| 😡 | 94 | 1.27% | |
| 😈 | 93 | 1.25% | |
| 🍌 | 88 | 1.19% | |
| 🖕 | 87 | 1.17% | |
| 😢 | 85 | 1.15% | |
| 🤬 | 85 | 1.15% | |
| 🤣 | 57 | 0.768% | |
| 😁 | 48 | 0.647% | |
| 👍 | 47 | 0.633% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 0.121% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 0.094% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 0.094% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 0.081% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.054% | |
| 9 further kinds | 14 | 0.189% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 318 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 31 August 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
#缅东妙瓦底、三佛塔片区最新诈骗形势分析 长期以来大众舆论多聚焦缅北局势,却忽略了缅东妙瓦底的电诈现状。 目前缅北持续有专项打击、案件宣判、人员遣返动作,局势持续降温。反观缅东,仅在今年8月泰康园区有过一次小规模整治,数百名人员集中待遣返,此后近两个月几乎无大规模清剿动作。 结合最新实地动态,对妙瓦底及三佛塔片区现状做一次客观梳理: 1. 旧园区回流、新园区隐蔽扩建 此前被打掉的部分园区,目前已有零散诈骗团伙重新入驻恢复运作。整体管控暴力、拘禁虐待行为相比前两年略有收敛,但并未消失。 2. 人员核心聚集带 目前绝大多数电诈人员,不再扎堆妙瓦底城内,而是集中分布在: 妙瓦底城外—三佛塔沿路的交克、瓦来、三佛塔、亚太片区。 并非外界以为的“全部往最南部迁移”,相反:亚太片区上游几十公里,已新建多处隐秘园区。 老牌亚太园区目前也有少量人员回流入驻,只是规模、曝光度大幅降低,因此网络讨论热度下降。 3. 为什么现在亚太片区热…
#网友投稿 缅北持续开展打击、宣判和遣返行动,电诈活动逐渐减少,但缅东妙瓦底和三佛塔一带仍有大量诈骗团伙活动。今年8月泰康园区经过一次小规模整治后,近两个月几乎没有大规模清剿行动 目前,妙瓦底部分旧园区已有诈骗团伙重新入驻,新园区也在隐蔽扩建。电诈人员主要集中在妙瓦底城外至三佛塔沿线,包括交克、瓦来、三佛塔和亚太片区。亚太上游几十公里还新建了多处园区,老牌亚太园区也有少量人员回流。虽然暴力管控、拘禁虐待等情况相比前两年有所减少,但诈骗活动并未停止,只是园区规模和网络曝光度有所下降 国内正在登记失联和滞留妙瓦底人员的信息,三佛塔部分园区也传出人员解散、分批撤离的动向。我判断妙瓦底滞留电诈人员可能达到十万级别,短期内难以全部清空。2026年底前可能开展一轮阶段性清剿,分批遣返数千人。随着缅北存量案件逐步处理,2027年反诈打击重点可能进一步转向缅东妙瓦底和三佛塔片区 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar Peopl…
#经水沟谷入境泰国的中国公民及一对泰籍夫妇被捕 涉送往老挝 10月17日,帕尧府警方在帕尧县警局附近1号公路逮捕一对泰籍夫妇及一名中国公民。#该中国公民经缅甸妙瓦底水沟谷入境泰国湄索,原计划送往老挝博胶省。夫妇供认收取14,000泰铢接应,将其从廊曼送往清莱。警方未在其身上发现护照,查扣本田汽车一辆及手机6部。中国公民被控非法入境居留,泰籍夫妇因协助逃避抓捕被调查 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料 : @fage1415 找对象 文案 :@cpdd0000
#掸邦东部发生4.4级地震 据缅甸气象与水文局消息,2026年10月18日凌晨3时38分26秒,缅甸掸邦东部发生一起4.4级地震。 震中位于孟克镇西偏北约26英里(约42公里),距离景栋地震台西北方向约48英里(约77公里),震源深度约10公里。 📍 地震信息 ▪️ 发生时间:10月18日凌晨3时38分26秒 ▪️ 地震震级:4.4级 ▪️ 震源深度:10公里 ▪️ 震中坐标:北纬21.78度,东经99.06度 目前,以上信息来自气象与水文局通报,暂未提供人员伤亡及财产损失情况。 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料 : @fage1415 找对象 文案 :@cpdd0000
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟😀😀😀😀😀😀 🌟 V6娱乐|总有一种玩法适合你 🫰 有时候不是不知道玩什么,而是想换个心情、换种体验。 ⚡️ 想感受数字带来的期待,就去彩票专区。 ⚡️ 喜欢真实现场的氛围,就选真人专区。 ⚡️ 想轻松放松一下,电子玩法任你挑选。 ⚡️ 多样捕鱼任你挑选,捕鱼专区随时开启。 🧸 不同时间、不同心情,都能找到喜欢的选择。 😘🌟🌟真人视讯 🌟🌟🌟彩票竞猜 🌟🌟🌟电子娱乐 🌟🌟🌟高倍爆奖 🌟🌟🌟棋牌竞技 🌟🌟🌟: v6052.cc 🌟🌟🌟:@HT_V6 🌟🌟🌟:@V06_CC 🌟🌟🌟: htgj.vip 🌟🌟🌟🌟:@v6v6ccbot
😎😎😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎 😎↖️😎😎😎😎😎😎🛍😎😎😎 🌐 亿级域名|2G.COM 品牌定位全球 实力超乎想象 全网福利天花板 入款笔笔送3%无上限 全网召集【老玩家入驻】VIP等级1:1平移 同行文案写的天花乱坠 不如2G的U到位 全球布局 · 100%保障出款 · 秒充秒提 💥新人超会赢,精彩时刻分享: 😎 PG电子 新玩家游戏中爆出160万U大奖,本金仅用8000U 😎😎😎 😎 DB真人 玩百家乐的老板,第一天存款66万U,提款680万U 😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎: 2g91.cc 🛍🛍🛍😎: @GF2Gcom 🥰领🥰会员 😎😎😎😎: @KF2Gcom 😎😎😎😎: @DL2Gcom 😎😎😎😎: @sx2ggbot 😎😎😎😎🛍😎😎😎 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
❤1
#仰光多处火车站附近吸毒现象引发担忧 据当地居民反映,近期仰光中央火车站、九文台、勒丹、甘马育、茵盛等多个火车站及铁路沿线,傍晚和夜间吸毒现象有所增加,现场还发现被遗弃的针头等吸毒用具,引发居民对公共安全和卫生问题的担忧。 部分居民表示,附近还发生车辆物品被盗及入室盗窃等事件,夜间安全令人忧虑。学生家长也担心,毒品流通问题可能对年轻人造成影响。 今年国际禁毒日期间,军方下属警察部队在仰光省销毁了过去一年查获的毒品及相关物品,总价值超过1.176万亿缅币。 📌 居民呼吁加强铁路沿线巡查、打击毒品交易,并妥善处理废弃针头,保障社区安全。 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料 : @fage1415 找对象 文案 :@cpdd0000
❤1
#泰方切断涉嫌输往缅甸境内电诈团伙的网络与电力线 据泰媒报道,缅泰边境三佛塔一带,泰国当局近日切断了被认为是从泰国境内输往缅甸境内网络诈骗团伙的网络和电力线路 本月15日,泰国国家广播电视和电信委员会(NBTC)、打击网络诈骗中心(ACSC)警方、第7区警察及行动部队等多部门联合行动,突击搜查了桑卡武里县农禄村(Nong Lu)内网络使用量异常高的两处可疑住宅 经搜查,泰方当局查获了: 跨境发射互联网信号的无线电设备、非法铺设的光纤电缆; 10台以太网媒体转换器(Ethernet Media Converter)、5台高性能路由器、电脑及相关配件、LAN CAT5e网线。此外,当局还查明犯罪嫌疑人篡改电表,将泰国电力非法转售至缅甸一侧,并当场抓获了2名主要嫌疑人 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料…
#缅甸律师扎丽埃获2026年IBA人权奖 缅甸律师、人权捍卫者扎丽埃近日在丹麦哥本哈根举行的国际律师协会(IBA)年会上,荣获2026年度杰出法律从业者人权贡献奖,以表彰她在维护法治、保护弱势群体方面作出的贡献。 2021年缅甸军事政变后,她在仰光为因政治原因遭任意拘留的民众提供免费法律援助,截至2023年已协助500多人获释。因持续遭受死亡威胁,她于2023年流亡泰国曼谷,但仍坚持人权工作。 扎丽埃领奖时表示,这份荣誉属于所有勇敢的缅甸律师、人权捍卫者及社区成员。 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料 : @fage1415 找对象 文案 :@cpdd0000
❤3
#亚太 #爆破拆除 昔日的辉煌与喧闹,终究化为了如今满地的废墟。 爆破声响过,曾经的建筑毁于一旦,曾经的人群荡然无存。 看着这片空无一人的狼藉,心里只剩下无尽的酸楚与唏嘘——繁华散尽,不过是一场废墟里的空欢喜。 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料 : @fage1415 找对象 文案 :@cpdd0000
👍2
#网友曝光 大家注意这个腊戌跑佤城的司机 ,我从腊戌带下来的东西已经10几天了还没有拿到东西,每次给他打电话打了十几通才接 每次接了就说几句明天会到说完就挂了 微信信息也不回 现在直接给我手机号码拉黑了 大家避雷这个司机 👻😇🥰😘💩✍️🍡🎈 缅甸人民日报 Myanmar People's Daily 🔔 订阅官方频道 🔗https://t.me/mdrmrb1 ☎️新闻爆料 : @fage1415 找对象 文案 :@cpdd0000
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,570 posts we hold for @mdrmrb1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@cpdd0000 · 16,294472 posts🔥金贝娱乐场-jinbei.com-【官方招商】🔥
@jbzhaoshang · 4,77449 postsbolai.com铂莱世界杯冠名
@blzhaoshang · 4,86037 postsV6娱乐
@HT_V6 · 3,92533 posts78.COM-官方频道@DF78
@tg78com · 28,26131 posts9公群 9Y国际综合娱乐 已押300万U
@daqun24 · 1,28928 posts凯旋娱乐 官方频道
@kxggg · 6,25119 postsUSDTGame |官方频道®
@usdtgame8 · 1,70119 postsLUNA【美妆 +美甲】频道(亚太+妙瓦底)
@LUNA_7_STUDIO_PD · 9617 posts2G官方频道
@GF2Gcom · 21815 posts忘忧酒吧(水沟谷)
@wyjb1688 · 1089 posts阿联酋迪拜🇦🇪 越南🇻🇳土耳其🇹🇷 人才直招
@qibao6688zhizhao · 2757 posts亚太交友闲聊群
@cpdd250 · 4,2333 postsV6国际速汇
@V6guoji · 861 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@mdrmrb1 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 11 posts, 14 September 2026 – 4 October 2026 · confirmed gone 18 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 17 October 2026 – 18 October 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ygxw3 · 145,795#1
@Huitainangzhubian168 · 2,667#2
@Ru_Yi88 · 210,778#3
@Ytzs_News · 3,700#4
@wbzd999 · 50,553#5
@dnygplm1 · 34,435#6
@cn789 · 19,926#7
@ninihuanhui1234 · 1,721#8
@miandianzhilv · 11,830#9
@haiyangjituan3344 · 26,165#10
@ytxwcg1 · 5,419#11
@Dajun20010729 · 4,148#12
@EFmoneyexchang · 2,585#13
@peiqi0921 · 5,215#14
@tandiandd · 2,856#15
@TXQZ22 · 4,253#16
@duoduoy444 · 6,571#17
@sggeswp · 1,316#18
@shuangshunjiaxc2 · 1,724#19
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kaihne2 · 79,789
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 19 August 2026
@ytxw88 · 39,751
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 20 August 2026
@wbzd999 · 50,553
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 20 August 2026
@c4747 · 44,166
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 18 here — alongside 17 others — read 19 August 2026
@shuigougux · 62,516
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 14 here — alongside 13 others — read 18 August 2026
@ygxw3 · 145,795
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 16 here — alongside 15 others — read 13 August 2026
@Ru_Yi88 · 210,778
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 24 here — alongside 23 others — read 12 August 2026
@uuuat · 134,393
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 19 here — alongside 18 others — read 13 August 2026
@ab100 · 132,101
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“缅甸人民日报🇲🇲” (@mdrmrb1), 42,270 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdrmrb1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.