Photo, posted without a caption
❤12💔5

Channel
@mdvenera
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
221subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002307142359 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mdvenera |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mdvenera |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 221 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 219 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:49 | 220 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 219 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 218 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 218 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
289 reactions across 14 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 96 | 33.2% | |
| 😍 | 45 | 15.6% | |
| 💔 | 35 | 12.1% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 6.57% | |
| 💘 | 16 | 5.54% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 5.54% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 5.19% | |
| 🤝 | 10 | 3.46% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 3.11% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 2.42% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 2.08% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 2.08% | |
| 👨💻 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.346% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12💔5
На прошлой неделе отметила важную тенденцию: все больше пациентов стали обращаться на прием по отзывам 🥰 Честно говоря, я не ожидала, что это работает настолько сильно. Когда люди подробно описывают свои случаи, на другие читатели видят похожую ситуацию и точно знают, к кому обращаться. 😭Это бесценно! Огромное спасибо всем, кто оставляет отзывы на «ПроДокторов». Если вы были у меня на приёме, вам понравилось, леч…
🥰15🦄3😍3❤1
Несмотря на нехватку времени, сил и других ресурсов, я все же стараюсь быть полезной 🤍
❤7🔥5💔4
💚Уважаемые пациенты! 📹 Выкладываем запись вебинара: «Функциональные расстройства ЖКТ: почему гастрит не болит? Изжога - всегда ли рефлюкс? Зачем антидепрессанты в гастроэнтерологии?» 🔊Спикер: Венера Шаеновна Стамболцян ▫️Гастроэнтеролог ▫️Аспирант кафедры им. С.М. Рысса ▫️Лауреат премии «Новые имена в медицине» по версии журнала «Собака.ru» ❓Если остались дополнительные вопросы - приглашаем на консультацию в Инст…
😍10💘7💔6❤2
БАДы и ВЗК - а какие мне витаминки попить для кишечника? Частый вопрос пациентов с язвенным колитом и болезнью Крона. Так вот, поясняю♥️
🔥11😍5🥰4❤1
Пишите вопросы в комментариях, на все отвечу🩷🥺
❤7
Уважаемые пациенты, встречайте анонс нового вебинара!☘️ 🔉Спикер: Венера Шаеновна Стамболцян ▫️Гастроэнтеролог ▫️Аспирант кафедры им. С.М. Рысса ▫️Лауреат премии «Новые имена в медицине» по версии журнала «Собака.ru» 🟣Тема вебинара: «Функциональные расстройства ЖКТ: почему гастрит не болит? Изжога - всегда ли рефлюкс? Зачем антидепрессанты в гастроэнтерологии?» ❗️💬ОСТАВЛЯЙТЕ СВОИ ВОПРОСЫ В КОММЕНТАРИЯХ! Наш доктор …
❤10😍6💔5
У меня такое впервые 😭
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥9💔6🥴4
Ред флаги, о которых вы должны знать: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUvnnFkDEHm/?igsh=MXJ5OTdiZ3I2Z2t2cQ==
❤11🏆4👨💻3🙏1
Умничаю 🤪
❤8💔3💘3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤15😍9❤🔥6🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @mdvenera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Муки аспиранта 🔮” (@mdvenera), 221 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mdvenera.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.