Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for рИдактор

Channel

рИдактор

@media_cry

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

230subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001658631097
TypeChannel
Username@media_cry
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/media_cry

Growth

230231230.57 August 2026 — 231 subscribers7 August 2026 — 230 subscribers8 August 2026 — 230 subscribers15 August 2026 — 231 subscribers21 August 2026 — 230 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 230–231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 09:54230-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:28231+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:16230no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:20230-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:43231first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

230 reactions across 19 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁8235.7%
3515.2%
😭156.52%
😢146.09%
🥴146.09%
🤡114.78%
🤮104.35%
🌚93.91%
🙉93.91%
👻83.48%
💯52.17%
🗿52.17%
🔥31.30%
🤬31.30%
👍20.87%
😱20.87%
💔10.435%
🤝10.435%
🥰10.435%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2025 to 16 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2025, 13:57 UTC800 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А що про всіх, хто після початку війни поїхав жити у Крим та РФ, будемо писати?

😁1413🤮10

11 Jun 2025, 10:34 UTC≈1,020 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Перевірені компетентні джерела.

11😁11👻8🗿5🤡1

8 May 2025, 06:10 UTC853 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Зламався хребет, але не життя.

🙉9🌚6😱2💔1

24 Apr 2025, 13:03 UTC721 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Що зробили страуси РФ? Міркування журналістів D1.

😁7🥰1😢1

16 Apr 2025, 13:13 UTC581 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вся інформаційна бульбашка просто кипить. Знайшли ворогів… А коли буде про тг-канали, керівників їх запрошують на закриті зустрічі з ОП?

💯5😭1

9 Apr 2025, 12:01 UTC465 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Важлива тема для дискусій. Колеги та колежанки, як вам співпраця з головою пресслужби нашої ОВА? Бо постійно чуємо якісь скандали та суперечки, пов’язані з цим.

🤡3👍1🔥1

26 Mar 2025, 21:26 UTC517 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

І комунальне медіа підʼїхало. Нє ну молодці. Ще й за наші з вами гроші грають на руку ворогу.

🤡7🌚3

26 Mar 2025, 21:15 UTC496 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

+1 в скарбничку їб***тів

😭8

26 Mar 2025, 21:09 UTC626 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну якщо вже фото всюди, то можна й у своїй помийці виставити. І це коли журналісти по кілька годин чекають допуску на місце прильотів.

😢13

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @media_cry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Петушиное кубло
@cockscublo · 58,633
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“рИдактор” (@media_cry), 230 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/media_cry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.