Channel
@medicine_generalsurgery
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003877039063 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medicine_generalsurgery |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 22 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medicine_generalsurgery |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 28 | +1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 27 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 23 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 20 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 19 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 19 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reconstruction using which of the following flaps is most appropriate in this patient?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🪡 Clinical Case Challenge 📚 Source: Prometric — Plastic Surgery MCQs 📝 A 72-year-old man undergoes wide local excision of a squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip. Margins are free of involvement. A photograph of the resulting defect is shown. Reconstruction using which of the following flaps is most appropriate in this patient? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎓 Medicine Hub — 465,000+ board questions with full explanations, …
What is the most likely diagnosis?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🪡 Clinical Case Challenge 📚 Source: Prometric — Neurosurgery MCQs 📝 The photomicrograph shown in this image demon strates the microscopic appearance of a posterior fossa mass in a 6yearold patient. What is the most likely diagnosis? ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎓 Medicine Hub — 465,000+ board questions with full explanations, images and analytics. 🌐 hub.medicine.ac • #Quiz #GeneralSurgery_Quiz
🪡 The Osler Thoracic Surgery Subscription-Based Oral Review (Certifying Exam) 📝 Course Overview: The Osler Thoracic Surgery Subscription-Based Oral Review (Certifying Exam) is designed for: Thoracic Surgeons: Professionals preparing for the American Board of Thoracic Surgery (ABTS) or the American Osteopathic Board of Surgery (AOBS) certifying exams. Surgical Residents and Fellows: Trainees seeking to enhance... 💙 …
🪡 Amboss Shelf Surgery QBank 2025 📝 Course Overview: Amboss Shelf Surgery QBank 2025 Discover the next-generation online learning system designed for medical students preparing for the Surgery Shelf Exam 2025. Works flawlessly on any device with complete online capability. macOS, iPhone and iPad users just open it in... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Qbank #AMBOSS #Surgery 👇 Tap the buttons below to explore:
🪡 Prometric Cardiothoracic Surgery QBank 2025 📝 Course Overview: One-Time Payment. Lifetime Access. Instant Online Access. Prometric Cardiothoracic Surgery QBank 2025 The Prometric Cardiothoracic Surgery QBank 2025 is a structured exam-style question package designed to strengthen clinical reasoning, improve accuracy, and build speed in a Prometric-like testing environment. This... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Prom…
🪡 The Aesthetic Society — The Business of Launching Your Practice 2025 📝 Course Overview: THE AESTHETIC SOCIETY • SEPTEMBER 13-14, 2025 • VIRTUAL SYMPOSIUM The Aesthetic Society — The Business of Launching Your Practice 2025 The Aesthetic Society — The Business of Launching Your Practice 2025 — A practical, step-by-step program on starting and... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Board #Dermatology #Plastic_Surgery #Sur…
🪡 NBME - Surgery Self-Assessment - Form 7 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: One-Time Payment. Lifetime Access. Fully Offline.NBME - Surgery Self-Assessment - Form 7 (Offline for Windows & Android)This NBME Self-Assessment runs fully offline on Windows & Android using the Medicine Academy proprietary Quiz Engine. Delivered via Google Drive with lifetime, unlimited... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #NBM…
🪡 CanadaQBank – Qbank For RCSFE 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: CanadaQBank – QBank for the RCSFE 2025 – Offline (Windows & Android) A complete and exam-focused RCSFE (Royal College Surgical Foundations Exam) 2025 QBank designed for Canadian surgical residents and IMGs. Includes high-yield basic science, surgical fundamentals, anatomy, critical care,... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #Qbank #Ca…
🪡 Amboss QBank - EOR - Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 is a focused End-of-Rotation surgical question bank designed to strengthen perioperative decision-making, diagnosis, and management across core surgical domains. This offline... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #AMBOSS #Qbank #Surgery …
🪡 Amboss QBank - EOR - Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) 📝 Course Overview: AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 (Offline for Windows & Android) AMBOSS QBank – EOR – Surgery 2025 is a focused End-of-Rotation surgical question bank designed to strengthen perioperative decision-making, diagnosis, and management across core surgical domains. This offline... 💙 Edition: 2025 📁 Category: #AMBOSS #Qbank #Surgery …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @medicine_generalsurgery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Reconstruction using which of the following flaps is most appropriate in this patient?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is the most likely diagnosis?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“General Surgery Resources | Medicine.ac” (@medicine_generalsurgery), 28 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medicine_generalsurgery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.