Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net +102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,349–2,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 12:59
2,467
+3
9 Sept 2026, 18:57
2,464
+41
4 Sept 2026, 08:18
2,423
-1
31 Aug 2026, 20:04
2,424
+5
25 Aug 2026, 22:53
2,419
+10
22 Aug 2026, 16:16
2,409
+10
18 Aug 2026, 23:06
2,399
+11
16 Aug 2026, 08:15
2,388
+5
12 Aug 2026, 20:43
2,383
-1
10 Aug 2026, 07:04
2,384
+20
7 Aug 2026, 10:02
2,364
-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:15
2,365
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:03
2,365
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
813 reactions across 27 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
689
84.7%
😁
54
6.64%
👍
32
3.94%
🤣
22
2.71%
😍
8
0.984%
😭
4
0.492%
👎
3
0.369%
🐳
1
0.123%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 813 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨
خدایا! به سبب دانشت که محیط بر همه چیز است، از تو درخواست خیر دارم؛ پس بر محمّد و آلش درود فرست و به خیر و نیکی در حقّ من حکم فرما.
و شناخت انتخاب کردن و برگزیدن را به ما الهام کن و آن الهام را برای ما وسیلۀ خشنودی به آنچه که برای ما مقرر کردی و تسلیم به آنچه در حقّ ما حکم فرمودی، قرار ده؛ پس آلودگی شک و دودلی در تقدیرت را از دل ما پاک کن و ما را به یقین مخلصان تقویت فرما.
✨
و داغ ناتوانی معرفت را نسبت به آنچه برای…
خب وقتی تصمیم گرفتم که نهایتا مسیر رزیدنتی رو انتخاب کنم، حالا باید تصمیم میگرفتم که استریت امتحان بدم یا اول وارد طرح بشم بعد. اینم تصمیم سختی بود، چون از یه طرف یه سری تجربیات منفی از دوران طرح شنیده بودم و از یک طرف هم یک سری تجربیات مثبت! هم آدمهایی رو میشناختم که توی طرح خیلی اذیت شدن، هم آدمهایی که توی طرحشون عشق کردن با اون شهر و محل و مردمش و کاری که میکردن. هم دوست داشتم تا وقتی حوصله و جون و استقامت ک…
خب فعلا تا همینجا رو داشته باشیم
تا کمکم تعریف کنم و ببینیم
چی شد که این دختر پر از ابهام و به دور از علاقه به رادیولوژی
یک ماه دیگه قراره رزیدنت سال سوم رادیولوژی بشه🐳🩻
و یک مسئلهای هم که وجود داره، اینه که درسته گاهی به سختی تصمیم میگیرم، ولی وقتی تصمیم گرفتم دل یک دله میکنم و دیگه اون پرونده رو توی ذهنم میبندم. به خودم میگم ببین تو با تجربه و معیارها و اولویتهای الانت، بعد از فکر و مشورت و توکل، بهترین تصمیمی که میتونستی بگیری رو گرفتی. پس از مسیرت توی این تصمیم نهایت لذت رو ببر. دیگه نیا با شرایط الان، تصمیم اون موقعت رو قضاوت کن که این این قضاوت فاقد انصاف و اعتباره.
یه س…
و حتی یک بازهای از اینکه باید تصمیم بگیرم میخوام مهاجرت کنم یا نه، شبها توی بالشتم گریه میکردم!
میگفتم نکنه مهاجرت نکنم و بمونم و بسوزم؟ نکنه خوشبخت نشم؟
یعنی حتی یک بازهای درگیر اینکه مهاجرت بکنم یا نکنم هم بودم و نهایتا فهمیدم، اون احساس خوشبختی و رضایت از زندگی، یک حس درونیه که درسته شرایط محیطی خیلی خیلی روش تاثیر میگذارن، اما کمال بلوغ در اینه که احساس از درون نشئت بگیره نه از بیرون و به این فکر کردم که حتی…
دوراهی اولم، سر این بود که اصلا رزیدنتی آری یا خیر!
من تقریبا از همون اول میدونستم که دلم میخواد متخصص بشم. یه دفترچه آرزوها دارم که مال ابتدای دوران دانشجویی عمومیه، و اولین آرزویی که توش نوشتم اینه " آرزو میکنم رزیدنت بشم":)))
چون من کار به وسعت دریا و به عمق یک سانت که عملا توی جیپی اتفاق میفته رو دوست نداشتم، دوست داشتم وارد یه حیطه بشم، توی یه گروه از متخصصین یه رشته و اونجا سری تو سرها دربیارم.
اما اون تایمی…
اما خب، اگه بخوام از مسیر خودم بگم،
باید بگم که پر از شک و ابهام و دو دلی بود. و من هی بین راههای مختلف گیر میافتادم و نمیدونستم کدوم رو انتخاب کنم. چرا؟ چون همه چیز رو با هم میخواستم. میخواستم همه چیز ایدئال باشه. ولی دنیا به این مدار نمیچرخه. همیشه یک نقصانی هست و فارغ از اون، هر به دست آوردنی، یه از دست دادنی داره. هر دستاوردی یه هزینهای داره که اگه تا قرون آخرش رو نپردازی، از اوم دستاورد خبری نیست. دستاورد…
این رشتهپیامها رو که خوندم، حس کردم یه عالمه از دغدغههای قدیمیم مثل تخمشربتیهای تهگرفته توی شربت یخچال خونهی مادربزرگ ، هَم خوردن و اومدن بالا و یادم افتاد که من خودم چقدر تک تک این دغدغهها رو هزار بار زندگی کردم و ترسیدم و بالا پایین کردم تا تونستم تصمیم بگیرم و خدا لطف کرد و تصمیمی که "درستِ من" بود رو گرفتم...
دکتر چ میگفت: رزیدنتایی که رفتن طرح و بعد میان داخلی و اطفال، آدمای پرتجربهتر و موفقترین. من خودم بیشتر میتونم روشون حساب کنم، بهشون اعتماد کنم. نسبت به جوجه دکتری که از اینترنی پریده اومده رزیدنتی.
دکتر الف میگفت: اگه مستقیم بری رزیدنتی و بعدش مثلا اتند شی توی جایی مثل پایتخت به جای ۴سال باید ۸ سال در خدمت سیستم باشی و طرحت ۸ساله میشه. البته که اگه هیئت علمی باشی زیاد فرقی نمیکنه ۴سال با ۸سال.
دکتر چ میگفت: میدونی همه این فکرا از چیه؟ گفتم: از چی؟ گفت: تو جوونیهای خود منی ریحانه. مشتاق، جاه طلب و پر از کمال گرایی. همه اینا از کمالگراییه. حالتو میفهمم چون منم همچین روزایی رو درست مثل تو گذروندم.
از ترم ۷ منو با ماسک با دکتر چ اشتباه میگرفتن. بس که چشم و ابرومون شبیه همه. بس که هم قد و قوارهایم. ولی فکرشو نمیکردم یه روزی خودش اعتراف کنه که چقدر وقتی همسن من بوده، شبیه من بوده. قلبمو تکون داد با این ح…
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @medlights. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Dr Behzad Chavooshi @drbehzadchavooshi · 54,959 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 September 2026
مدرسه پزشکی | امیرمحمد قربانی @schoolofmedicine_ir · 26,380 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Medlight 💡” (@medlights), 2,467 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medlights.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.