25 measurements spanning 27 days, net +217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,324–11,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 04:37
11,579
+9
2 Sept 2026, 18:02
11,570
+15
1 Sept 2026, 16:47
11,555
+22
31 Aug 2026, 15:54
11,533
+11
30 Aug 2026, 14:47
11,522
+9
29 Aug 2026, 12:23
11,513
+4
28 Aug 2026, 14:13
11,509
+34
27 Aug 2026, 10:57
11,475
+4
26 Aug 2026, 07:53
11,471
+7
25 Aug 2026, 04:56
11,464
+8
24 Aug 2026, 04:17
11,456
-1
22 Aug 2026, 09:25
11,457
+4
20 Aug 2026, 23:49
11,453
+4
19 Aug 2026, 21:42
11,449
+8
18 Aug 2026, 20:43
11,441
+8
17 Aug 2026, 21:24
11,433
+14
16 Aug 2026, 18:03
11,419
+15
15 Aug 2026, 00:44
11,404
+5
13 Aug 2026, 14:18
11,399
-1
12 Aug 2026, 15:14
11,400
first reading
Engagement
200 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 11,579 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
178 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
178
of 200 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 176 of 178 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
200 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
208,719
Reactions total
2,460
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26m 23s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,725 reactions across 197 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,725
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 198 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,725 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 یه اشتباه رایج توی دوران جمعبندی:
اینکه بشینی دوباره از اول یه درس رو کامل بخونی، بدون اینکه بدونی کدوم قسمتها بیشتر به درد آزمون میخورن!❌
توی این روزها بهتره مطالعهت سؤالمحورتر بشه؛
یعنی ببینی از هر مبحث چه تیپهایی سؤال شده، کجاها بیشتر تکرار شدن و کدوم نکات هنوز برات ضعف محسوب میشن📝
جمعبندی یعنی انتخاب هوشمندانهتر، نه فقط بیشتر خوندن🎯
آدرس 🤩 | لینک 🤩
دیدنِ 🤩 | معرفی 🤩
🦠 یه نکته درباره ویروس که خیلی وقتها نادیده گرفته میشه:
قرار نیست برای مسلط شدن به ویروسشناسی، تکتک مطالب رو جداگانه حفظ کنی!
وقتی ارتباط بین ویروسها، ویژگیهاشون و تیپ سؤالهایی که ازشون مطرح میشه رو بفهمی، خیلی از نکات به هم وصل میشن و مرورشون هم راحتتر میشه🧠
پس اگه ویروس برات هنوز یه عالمه اسم پراکندهست، احتمالاً مشکل از حجم درس نیست؛ از مدل مطالعهشه😉
آدرس 🤩 | لینک 🤩
دیدنِ 🤩 | معرفی 🤩
و اما پروندهی بعدی…
🦠 ویروسشناسی!
از اون درسایی که وقتی بخوای تکتک ویروسها رو جداگانه و بدون دستهبندی حفظ کنی، خیلی زود تبدیل میشه به یه عالمه اسم و عدد و نکتهی قاطیپاتی 🫠
⬅️ ولی وقتی مطالب رو دستهبندیشده و بر اساس تیپ تستها ببینی، داستان خیلی قابلکنترلتر میشه.
حتی ساختار تدریس فینیشینگ ویروس هم بر همین اساس طراحی شده؛
درسنامه طبقهبندیشده + تحلیل تستهای سالهای اخیر + کتابکار برای مرور📝😍
آدرس 🤩 …
حالا بریم سراغ یکی از دو پروندهای که هنوز روی میز مونده… 👀
💉 ایمنیشناسی
همایشی که قرار نیست فقط بشینی چند ساعت مطلب گوش بدی؛
قرارِ مباحث مهم رو از زاویهی تست و نکات پرتکرار ببینی و برای جمعبندی نهایی مرتبشون کنی📝
دقیقاً همون چیزی که تو این بازه بیشتر از هر چیز بهش نیاز داری:
کمتر پراکندهخوانی، و تمرکز بیشتر روی چیزهای مهم🎯
یه اعتراف کوچولو، کدوم درس علوم پایه رو هر بار باز میکنی با خودت میگی:
«این دیگه آخرین باره که میخونمش» ولی چندروز بعد دوباره برمیگردی سراغش؟❕
فیزیولوژی👍30%
ویروس🦠16%
ایمنی🚫17%
اناتومی📝58%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⭕️ اگه تو هم فکرمیکنی توی دوران جمع بندی باید همهچی رو دوباره از اول بخونیم! سخت در اشتباهی❗️🫠
در حالی که الان وقتِ پیدا کردن نقاط ضعفه، نه دوبارهخوانی کورکورانه❌
🟣یه مبحث رو مرور کن
🟣چندتا تست بزن
🟣غلطهات رو جدا کن
🟣همون قسمتهایی که مشکل داشتی رو برگرد و بخون
اینطوری هر ساعت مطالعهت دقیقاً روی چیزی میره که بهش نیاز داری🎯
جمعبندی یعنی هدفمندتر خوندن، نه فقط بیشتر خوندن❤️🔥
روز بخیر به تیمی که هنوز داره برای این آزمون میجنگه! ☀️🫀
این روزای آخر قرار نیست با حجم مطالعهت رکورد بزنی؛
قرارِ از ساعتهایی که داری، بیشترین نتیجه رو بگیری🌟
پس امروز هم قراره باهم جلو بریم؛
یه کم درس، یه کم تست و کمی هم جمعبندی 👀🔥
❗ همایش جمع بندی واقعا برای چه کسی مناسبه؟
⬅️ پاسخ این سوال رو از زبان خود مدرس
همایشهای جمع بندی بشنوید:
🤩دکترسیدعلی معتمدشریعتی، رتبه ۱ کشوری آزمون علوم پایه
⏰ اگر تو ام یه ماه دیگه ازمون علوم پایه داری ، حتما این ویدیو رو ببین تا بدونی باید چیکارکنی✔️
یه اشتباه رایج توی جمعبندی اینه که فکر میکنیم:
«باید اول همهچی رو کامل بخونم، بعد برم سراغ تست.»
در حالی که توی این مرحله، تست خودش بخشی از مطالعهست🧠
وقتی تستهای سالهای قبل رو میبینی، تازه متوجه میشی کدوم قسمتهای یه فصل واقعاً ارزش وقت گذاشتن دارن و کدومها نه.
پس اگه هنوز داری با وسواس دنبال «کامل خوندن» میری جلو، یه بار استراتژیتو مرور کن👀
صبح بخیر به رفقای علوم پایهای 💓
یه سؤال برای شروع امروز:
اگه قرار باشه فقط یک درس رو امروز جدیتر از همیشه بخونی، کدومو انتخاب میکنی؟ 👀
نه لزوماً سختترین درس…
همونی که میدونی اگه امروز یه قدم جلو ببریش، شب حس بهتری داری😌📚
بزن بریم که امروز هم یه تیک دیگه از مسیرمون بخوره ✅
🚨 یه اشتباه خطرناک توی ۳۰ روز پایانی:
اینکه هر روز با یه لیست بلندبالا از مطالب جدید شروع کنی و آخر شب فقط تیک بزنی که «امروز هم خوندم».
توی این مرحله باید بین این سهتا تعادل داشته باشی:
📚 مطالعهی باقیماندهها
📝 تست و تحلیل
🔁 مرور مطالب قبلی
اگه یکی از این سهتا کامل حذف بشه، یه جای کار میلنگه.
⬅️ جمعبندی درست یعنی مدیریت همین سهتا کنار هم🧠
یه یادآوری مجدد برای اونایی که فکر میکنن «خب فیزیولوژی که تموم شد، دیگه کاری نداریم» 😅
نه رفیق! تازه وارد بخش مهم ماجرا شدیم👀
بعد از فیزیولوژی، هنوز
ایمنیشناسی و ویروسشناسی
رو هم داریم😎؛
🧬 همایش جمعبندی ایمنیشناسی ⬅️ ۲۴ شهریور
🦠 همایش جمعبندی ویروسشناسی ⬅️ ۲۶ شهریور
💎 یعنی این ماه قراره چندتا از درسهای مهم رو یکییکی از حالت «پراکنده و حجیم» برسونیم به حالت جمعشده و آزمونی 😎
❤18
Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @medtest2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@medtest2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
یه اعتراف کوچولو، کدوم درس علوم پایه رو هر بار باز میکنی با خودت میگی:
«این دیگه آخرین باره که میخونمش» ولی چندروز بعد دوباره برمیگردی سراغش؟❕
فیزیولوژی👍30%
ویروس🦠16%
ایمنی🚫17%
اناتومی📝58%
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
بزار یه اعتراف کوچیک داشته باشیم 😂👇
اگه همین الان آزمون علوم برگزار بشه، وضعیت فیزیولوژیت چطوره؟
بزن بریم، آمادهام 😎13%
یه مرور جدی لازم دارم🤡24%
یه عالمه خوندم ولی قاطی کردم 🥲9%
فعلا ترجیح میدم به این سوال فکرنکنم🙄58%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
همین الان وضعیتت تو فیزیولوژی به کدوم موقعیت نزدیکتره؟ 🤨
تقریبا مسلطم، فقط مرور می خوام 📝16%
خوندم ولی خیلی چیزا قاطی شده 😔16%
یه قسمت هایی رو هنوز جدی نخوندم 😬21%
فیزیولوژی ❓ من و فیزیولوژی هنوز در مرحله آشنایی هستیم 💍50%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
ساعت مرور نکات مهم + 2 ساعت تحلیل تست های سال های اخیر 📝87%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مدیکالیسم | medicalism @Doctor_MIB_iran · 44,169 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
کار دانشجویی علوم پزشکی | مدیلنسر @medilancer · 94,351 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
دانشجویان علوم پزشکی @medicall_students · 74,890 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
فیلمومِد @Learningvideos99 · 37,702 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Medical_PDF💉 @pdfvahidzali · 88,014 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Medical University 🏛⚕ @medicaluniversity · 82,165 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
دانلود کتاب و جزوه | کتابخانه علوم پزشکی @med_science · 31,452 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
داروشناسی پزشکی @medical_drugs1 · 52,134 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 August 2026
خلاصه های بالینی | مدوفست @medofast_balini · 33,511 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
بانک PDF پزشکی📚 @PDFbankdaro · 32,277 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
پُست کشیک @postkeshik · 39,126 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026
توییتر دانشجویان علوم پزشکی @medtweeet · 84,278 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
برایِ...! | موزیک @BarayeChnl · 40,646 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 August 2026
📥منبع فایل (PDF) علوم پزشکی📤 (Medfile_Pharma) @medfile_pharma · 46,677 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
Med Line | مِد لاین @Medical_line · 37,689 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“علوم پایه مدتست” (@medtest2), 11,579 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medtest2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.