#فایل 🏵 #جزوه 📕 #کتاب #شرح_حال
🗿1

Channel
@medtoon
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,609subscribers
+818 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002170474640 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @medtoon |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/medtoon |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 21,609 | +39 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 21,570 | +36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:46 | 21,534 | +37 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:54 | 21,497 | +35 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 21,462 | +18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 21,444 | +15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 21,429 | +27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 21,402 | +14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 21,388 | +51 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 21,337 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 21,330 | +31 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 21,299 | +60 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 21,239 | +46 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 21,193 | +31 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 21,162 | +38 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 21,124 | +23 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 21,101 | +20 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 21,081 | +55 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 21,026 | +50 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 20,976 | first reading |
75 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 47 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (1 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 55,419 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
73 reactions across 35 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 37 | 50.7% | |
| 🙏 | 19 | 26.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 5.48% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 4.11% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.74% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.37% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.37% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#فایل 🏵 #جزوه 📕 #کتاب #شرح_حال
🗿1
⭐فوری زودخون پاتولوژی رایگان شد ⭐ بچهها زودخون، پاتولوژی رو تا یه هفته رایگان کرده الان بگیرید تو حساب کاربری تون میمونه هروقت خواستید میتونید بعدش تستاشو بزنید منخودم گرفتم قبل رایگان کردن قیمتش 900 هزار تومن بود 🚗 بهترین فرصته الان حتما اگه حساب ندارید برید یه اکانت باز کنید تو اپلیکیشن زودخون بعدش پاتولوژی رو بگیرید حتما اینم نسخه تحت وبشه نیاز به نصبم نداره👇 🌐 web.zoodkhoon.ir 👈برای اونایی که زودخونو نمی…
🤣1
#خزانه #دستیاری #پاتولوژی
❤3
#خزانه #دستیاری #ENT
❤3
#خزانه #دستیاری #جراحی
❤2
⭐ فوری داوطلبین دستیاری ۱۴۰۶ و ۱۴۰۷ تا وقتی رایگانه همه توش شرکت کنید 👇 🌐| https://openmed.ir/product/7khan4/ یکبار درسال اتفاق میفته 👆
⭐ گزینه ی سوم : یه مقوله جداست شرو کردم هرچی ازمون هست به خصوص ازمون های مدیکالیسم تایپ شده یا وب اپ اخیر که اپدیت ترین با پاسخ تشریحیه و قابلیت خود آزمون داره از این گرفته تا آزمونهای موسسات مشهور رو بهش زدم و اصلا رفرنس مطالعه ای نیستن و خودازمون هستن و نیاز بود جداگانه باشه . هرچند توش در کنار ازمون های تالیفی کامران احمدی QB های او هم منشن شده . گزینه ۴ هم که منابع خارجیه مشهور USMLE که توی ربات لیبژن سابق دسته…
دوستان یه خلاصه ای از منوی کلینیکال میگم تا شک و شبهه اتون برطرف بشه 🫰 🔴 لینک اصلی منابع کلینیکال در حالت کلی اینه : https://t.me/medicalismBot?start=clinicalpanel علت تقسیم بندی به دو حالت ( بر اساس اسم موسسه) و (تقسیم بندی بر اساس اسم کورس) اینه که مجبور بودم بر اساس سلیقه های شما تقسیمش کنم و بعدا دیدم هرکسی سلیقه خاص خودشو داره و کاری کردم ربات پاسخگوی هردو قشر باشه و گم نشن 💠بر اساس اسم موسسه : همیشه اپدیت …
هرکسی که برای رزیدنتی میخواد یه روزی آزمون بده براش واجبه تو این وبینار رایگان که قراره ۱۰۰ تا رتبه خفن دستیاری توش از تجربه هاشون حرف بزنن شرکت کنه 👇 https://openmed.ir/product/7khan4/ ❌فقط تا فردا مهلت ثبت نامش رایگانه 👆
Posted without readable text
پیله یا کیوبی؟ 🤔 پیله بهعنوان همهچییهجاباهم پره و دستیاری تمام نیاز درسیای که داری رو برات حل میکنه: 📈هم بهتر یاد میگیری ⏰هم ماندگارتر مرور میکنی ✔️هم با آزمون و آزمونک خودتو میسنجی همچنین کل روماتولوژی داخل پیله رایگان هستش، توصیه میکنیم با تماشای ویدئوی پایین با فضای اپ آشنا بشی و بعدش روماتوی رایگان رو تست کنی👇 (فیلترشکن باید خاموش باشه!) 📌 http://file.mypileh.ir/video/introduction-to-pileh.mp4 آدر…
❤1🤣1🤨1
🇲 🇪 🇩 🇹 🇴 🇴 🇳 pinned «😍 منوی جامع کامران احمدی و QB های ۴۰۴-۴۰۵ Qb های ۴۰۵ موجودن 🌐 https://t.me/medicalismBot?start=kamranahmadi»
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @medtoon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇲 🇪 🇩 🇹 🇴 🇴 🇳” (@medtoon), 21,609 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/medtoon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.