Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мегаэкспрессив

Channel

Мегаэкспрессив

@megaexpressive

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,985subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001783227343
TypeChannel
Username@megaexpressive
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/megaexpressive

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,9803,9903,9856 August 2026 — 3,983 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,983 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,987 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,982 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,981 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,980 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,986 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,983 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,982 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,987 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,990 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,988 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,985 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,979–3,992 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 18:553,985-3
13 Sept 2026, 07:373,988-2
9 Sept 2026, 06:153,990+3
3 Sept 2026, 21:213,987+5
28 Aug 2026, 23:243,982-1
25 Aug 2026, 18:433,983-3
22 Aug 2026, 13:133,986+6
19 Aug 2026, 08:353,980-1
16 Aug 2026, 08:523,981-1
12 Aug 2026, 18:463,982-5
9 Aug 2026, 20:113,987+4
6 Aug 2026, 04:203,983no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:513,983first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,956 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,18240.0%
🔥43314.6%
👍37512.7%
😁37512.7%
🥰1916.46%
😭842.84%
⚡501.69%
🤔491.66%
💯401.35%
🤯331.12%
✍301.01%
👎301.01%
👏180.609%
😱120.406%
😎110.372%
🤡110.372%
🤩90.304%
🌚40.135%
👻40.135%
😢40.135%
6 further kinds110.372%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,956 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,580 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новый альбом Rolling Stones - очень приятный. Мне тут понравилось больше песен, чем мне в среднем нравится на их классических пластинках. Да, я не трушный фанат, факт)

🥰40❤18✍4👍1🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC≈2,340 views144 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

"Одержимая" (1981) - безумная вещь. Кино поражает каждые 10 минут. Темп фильма для арт-хауса 80-х - феноменальный. Следующий шаг героев предсказать невозможно. Финал - тотальный отрыв. На выходе фильм, наверно, шокировал. Точно известно, что он разочаровал Тарковского. А сейчас в эпоху доминирования возвышенных хорроров и мемов он как будто попал в своё время) 8/10

🔥83❤39👍11🥰4✍3❤‍🔥2🌚2

2 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC≈12,800 views353 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Одиссея» - кривое кино Нет, это определённо не скучное кино и не так чтобы прям плохое, есть пяток эффектных сцен, три часа пролетают незаметно. НО! Я ничего не почувствовал. Обычно фильмы Нолана вызывают во мне трепет, а этот просто начался и закончился. Главная проблема - кино не выглядит цельным: это грубо сшитый набор эпизодов. Причём даже самые яркие из них (Циклоп, Цирцея) не воспринимаются как важные, Нола…

👍144😭83🤔38❤34👎26🤡10👏5🤬4

1 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC≈2,960 views76 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Музыкальный топ июля Переслушал почти весь Pink Floyd. Открыл для себя A Saucerful of Secrets. Пробежался по хайлайтам дискографии Принса. Добавил много песен. Переслушал весь QOTSA. Кто вдруг с ними не знаком ...Like Clockwork - это маст. У Smashing Pumpkins несколько раз прогнал Siamese Dream. Мне не так часто заходит электроника, но после коллабы с Nine Inch Nails решил попробовать что-то ещё у Boys Noize и в…

❤50🔥13⚡12👏1

29 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC≈3,640 views162 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Live Подкаст 3

🔥93❤52👏11🌚2👍2👎1💘1

27 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC≈3,840 views111 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданно для всех (в том числе для себя) устроил марафон работ Абеля Феррары с Кристофером Уокеном. «Король Нью-Йорка» - стильный криминал о социально-ответственном гангстере. Сюжета не так чтобы много, зато Уокен - абсолютно магнетический; Лоуренс Фишборн здесь выдал настолько экспрессивный перфоманс, что потом играл исключительно взвешенных, спокойных людей; операторская работа зачем-то даже слишком красивая. А …

❤68🔥30👍9✍4

26 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC≈3,790 views281 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Живу в Бэкрумсах

😁186❤45🥰19🤯14😱8🔥5👍4

21 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC≈5,170 views102 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Организовал мини-марафон Такеши Китано. Имя громкое, но никогда не погружался основательно в его творчество. Фильмы давно лежали в отложке. Мысли: «Жестокий полицейский» Знакомая история про полицейского, который готов переходить границы дозволенного ради справедливости. Однако всё как будто перевёрнуто с ног на голову в мелочах: погони под расслабляющую музыку, драматичные столкновения персонажей - без каких-либо э…

❤66👍18🔥9🤔6✍1💊1🤡1

7 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC≈5,260 views78 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Nine Inch Noize Nine Inch Nails переосмыслили дюжину своих песен в духе рейва и танцевальной музыки. Причём это не только золотые хиты, а преимуществеенно просто крутые вещи с альбомов 21 века (с явным упором на и без того электронный Year Zero). Получилось очень качово. Особенно кайфанул от Parasite, Copy of a и Memorabilia. Этот звук реально заставляет двигаться.

💯40❤23🔥14✍1

5 Jul 2026, 16:15 UTC≈4,920 views136 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Стал фанатом Tyler, The Creator и купил много дисков

❤83⚡30🔥18🤯5

1 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC≈5,880 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Такой расклад был в июне Много слушал концертных записей Pearl Jam. Вот эта хорошая. Да, там всего один лайк, скрытая жемчужина))) Новый альбом Puscifer - Normal Isn't - неплох. Мейнард Джеймс Кинан продолжает заставлять задуматься! В который раз взялся за Стену Пинк Флойда... Ну не моё и всё тут. Вот меланхолия The Final Cut каким-то образом со мной мэтчится гораздо лучше. Компенсировал отстутсвие пары любимых а…

❤49👍9✍6🔥3

28 Jun 2026, 10:17 UTC≈6,540 views282 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Надо было слушать людей, которые меня отговаривали смотреть «Грозовой перевал» (2026). Тут нет никакого особого современного взгляда на классику. Создатели очевидно хотели дать перчинки, но на фоне общей пикантности современных фильмов и сериалов - это так, баловство. К моему большому сожалению, кино даже не входит в категорию «так плохо, что хорошо». Ну это просто никак. Самая пресная лавстори эва. Во время просм…

😁144❤96👍23🔥10🤔4👎3🤯1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @megaexpressive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кино Огонь
@kinoogon_official · 27,064
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 September 2026
Вестник Чака
@tele_chuck · 33,662
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мегаэкспрессив” (@megaexpressive), 3,985 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megaexpressive.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.