Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for карательная библиотерапия

Channel

карательная библиотерапия

@megagingerbread

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,054subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653252687
TypeChannel
Username@megagingerbread
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/megagingerbread

Growth

2,0522,0702,0616 August 2026 — 2,064 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,064 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,065 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,066 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,070 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,060 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,058 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,063 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,052 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,054 subscribers2,0546 August 20269 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 34 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,049–2,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 04:182,054+2
4 Sept 2026, 02:392,052-11
31 Aug 2026, 18:272,063+5
29 Aug 2026, 01:432,058-2
26 Aug 2026, 01:082,060-10
22 Aug 2026, 17:042,070+4
16 Aug 2026, 08:422,066+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:412,065+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:192,064no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:332,064first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 10 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10829.9%
😁7420.5%
🔥4311.9%
👀369.97%
😱195.26%
🍾164.43%
😍143.88%
🤣92.49%
💯82.22%
🌚61.66%
🤝61.66%
💔51.39%
41.11%
👍41.11%
🌭30.831%
💅30.831%
🤪20.554%
👏10.277%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 841 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC155 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐸 Да, уже прошла целая неделя августа, но я была очень занята, поэтому итоги июля только сейчас! Что вы (да и я!) могли пропустить на этом канальчике: Книги: ✏️ Препарат: «Шепот глубин» Эммы Хэмм ✏️ Препарат: «Симпати Тауэр Токио» Риэ Кудан ✏️ Без рецепта: «Луч» Даниила Туровского ✏️ Препарат: «Чувство дома» Даниэля Шрайбера Литтусы: 🥳 Черный рынок 🥳 Дэрэ книжного рейва 🥳 Новый книжный Озеро 🥳 Презентация мемуаров

7👍3🔥3👏1

7 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC231 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Дилемма 3

  1. Съесть пышку вместе с Хармсом44%
  2. Съесть шаверму вместе с Бродским56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👀73🌭3🍾1👍1

7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC238 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Дилемма 2

  1. Съездить в СПБ и не посетить там ни одного бара70%
  2. Съездить в СПБ и не посетить там ни одного книжного30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😱15🌚6💔5🍾1🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC230 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Дилемма 1

  1. Экскурсия по Петербургу от Графа Аверина57%
  2. Экскурсия по Петербургу от Раскольникова43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤣7🔥5🤪2

7 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC229 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Питерские книжные дилеммы! Ура! #дилеммы

😁32🍾146🔥5

7 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC225 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Этот книжный вы тоже знаете 😍

26🔥16😍6💅3

6 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC333 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С завтрашнего дня возвращаюсь в нормальную блогерскую жизнь, планы такие

28😁20🤝6🤣2💯1

6 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC366 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну этот книжный вы знаете!

👀1913💯7

6 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC359 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А в чем конкретно великолепие?.. 🫠🤔

😁18👀104😱4

6 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC372 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну что, книжные, я пришла, открывайте двери 🤓

25🔥13😍8😁4

5 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC≈287 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну а какой вечерний мемас вы ждёте в первом часу ночи...

5 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC≈316 views56 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На Книжных аллеях очень странно, конечно... К ним пришел топовый книжный блогер, ноль реакции, ноль просьб об автографах, ещё и за книги просят платить...

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @megagingerbread. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTCAnonymous Poll146 voters

Дилемма 3

  1. Съесть пышку вместе с Хармсом44%
  2. Съесть шаверму вместе с Бродским56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTCAnonymous Poll156 voters

Дилемма 2

  1. Съездить в СПБ и не посетить там ни одного бара70%
  2. Съездить в СПБ и не посетить там ни одного книжного30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTCAnonymous Poll143 voters

Дилемма 1

  1. Экскурсия по Петербургу от Графа Аверина57%
  2. Экскурсия по Петербургу от Раскольникова43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

еврейка у микрофона
@urfavjewishgirl · 43,894
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“карательная библиотерапия” (@megagingerbread), 2,054 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megagingerbread.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.