Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MeganRose

Channel

MeganRose

@meganrosecontact

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,995subscribers

-561 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001491700960
TypeChannel
Username@meganrosecontact
Created27 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/meganrosecontact

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,99514,55614,275.56 August 20266 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -561. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,911–14,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 23:2713,995-8
5 Nov 2026, 21:1814,003-7
4 Nov 2026, 18:1714,010-3
3 Nov 2026, 19:1114,013-8
2 Nov 2026, 16:0614,021-1
1 Nov 2026, 12:3514,022-8
31 Oct 2026, 09:1614,030-3
30 Oct 2026, 06:3614,033-9
29 Oct 2026, 06:1014,042-6
28 Oct 2026, 07:1614,048-9
27 Oct 2026, 04:2714,057-5
26 Oct 2026, 04:4914,062-13
25 Oct 2026, 04:0614,075-3
24 Oct 2026, 05:4714,078-9
23 Oct 2026, 09:2014,087-5
22 Oct 2026, 07:0014,092-10
21 Oct 2026, 03:2114,102-5
19 Oct 2026, 23:5614,107-8
18 Oct 2026, 23:4814,115-7
17 Oct 2026, 23:0614,122first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 13,995 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,120
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held64 (8 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total81,142
Reactions total3,560
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,750
Videos
≈552
Links
≈717

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18m 15s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,811 reactions across 64 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,88460.0%
🔥1,13111.5%
💯8828.99%
👍2732.78%
🥰2312.35%
🦄2242.28%
😎1541.57%
🤣1461.49%
👏1291.31%
❤‍🔥1111.13%
😁1071.09%
🤩780.795%
🎉770.785%
⚡750.764%
🙏680.693%
🤗400.408%
🕊380.387%
🤔310.316%
🏆300.306%
🤪140.143%
18 further kinds880.897%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,811 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 17:14 UTC302 views15 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://x.com/thejusticedept/status/2118387344944308552?a=Cu3UrJc_lcfUfu0-WiM&s=46

🔥15

7 Nov 2026, 01:55 UTC≈1,220 views96 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

👀👀 https://x.com/PeteHegseth/status/2118787462696743035

❤75⚡12🔥6😎2🤩1

6 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,440 views120 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Very interesting… According to U.S. Space Force Col. Peter “Charlie”Norsky— Space Force Guardians will now operate alongside elite SOF units like SEALs and Green Berets in a supporting/integrating role focused on space domain capabilities The command took had a formal ceremony on November 2, 2026, one day before the midterms. “Guardians (Space Force personnel) will serve in Space Special Warfare Teams attached to …

🔥82👏25❤6🕊3🤩3🫡1

6 Nov 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,540 views104 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

On Election Day… this quietly happened 👀 The American Declaration of Freedom in Space — A bold vision statement for American leadership in becoming a multiplanetary civilization. It declares that America’s destiny is to explore and expand frontiers “to the farthest depths of space.” The solar system and all of outer space are proclaimed the province of all humans, open to exploration, development, use, and the esta…

❤77🔥17👍5🦄3🤗1😎1

4 Nov 2026, 22:02 UTC≈1,900 views190 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

If heaven is somewhere else, then I don’t want to go 😇

❤141🥰27⚡8🦄6❤‍🔥4🔥3😇1

4 Nov 2026, 20:11 UTC≈4,090 views191 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

“America is over” Saddle up lightweights, it ain’t over 😎

🔥98💯38❤24👍14🎉6🙏4🤣2🦄2

4 Nov 2026, 12:07 UTC≈2,020 views67 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Val Nek discusses the Moon and Mars government 🇺🇸 https://youtu.be/kVlqbT5a_l8?si=-n2fdNXIq4lRvR5o

❤49🔥14😎4

4 Nov 2026, 11:56 UTC≈2,030 views67 reactionsread 7 November 2026

https://x.com/outerspacetoday/status/2117769797035602094/photo/1?s=46

❤43🔥20🤩4

3 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,310 views155 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

FAFO time!

🔥97💯41👀7🦄4🤗2🤩2❤1🫡1

3 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,110 views192 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

You can be a communist or you can be a patriot. You cannot be both.

🔥101💯41❤31👍19

1 Nov 2026, 22:52 UTC≈2,460 views203 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Pooh went hunting today 🎉

❤164😎16🔥10🤗8🏆3🦄2

1 Nov 2026, 20:23 UTC≈2,400 views193 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Back on my high horse, watch out world 🌎 The one and only Ruffino the dream boat 🦄

❤165🔥15🦄5👏4😁3🏆1

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @meganrosecontact. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Alexander Quinn - Ascension Channel
@alexanderquinn1 · 20,113
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 27 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MeganRose” (@meganrosecontact), 13,995 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meganrosecontact.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.