Channel

MEGASCONTI WEB

@megascontiweb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,076subscribers

-134 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001461672470
Type	Channel
Username	@megascontiweb
Created	Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	15 September 2026
Measurements held	13
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/megascontiweb

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -134. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,056–9,230 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
15 Sept 2026, 20:57	9,076	-16
12 Sept 2026, 09:18	9,092	-17
8 Sept 2026, 00:59	9,109	-10
2 Sept 2026, 20:15	9,119	-7
30 Aug 2026, 09:36	9,126	-3
27 Aug 2026, 15:13	9,129	-9
24 Aug 2026, 18:04	9,138	-16
20 Aug 2026, 16:57	9,154	-11
17 Aug 2026, 20:44	9,165	-14
14 Aug 2026, 22:46	9,179	-12
11 Aug 2026, 08:53	9,191	-16
8 Aug 2026, 08:37	9,207	-3
7 Aug 2026, 18:32	9,210	first reading

Engagement

69 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 1.20%; avg views ÷ 9,076 subscribers
Avg views / post: 109; 4 posts measured
Reaction rate: —; this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window: 4; of 69 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held	69 (7 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total	436
Reactions total	—
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	28 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.