Channel
@memorimee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
—subscribers
| Telegram ID | -1001539820214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @memorimee |
| Description | Off!cial One : @mybfsuga Off!cial twO : @lovingaceh Sh!t pOst : @badasgirljeniu Contacts : @xseralaybot Memor!es : @memorimee playl!st : @playlistnameser |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 27 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 0 |
| On Telegram | t.me/memorimee |
Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
11 posts held, back to 27 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 November 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
@JEVENDRA95 , @M0MMYKJN , @cecanjetpaipp , @abusifee , @degemjetuju , @cutestjetwan , @rroseanevpark , @gladysxlx , @GKTH95G , @rparkcheayozngg , @ihyunjinasli , @sharonminna , @jjvnxacf , @jacqueenbarex , @pacrjimin , @duplicatjeniu , @sextoey , @xjendukize
by : vania
W🅘🅣H KOSAN IU DORM🃏💥
WITH BLACKBANGTAN DORM 1💀💥
𝕱𝗢T🅱️A𝐑 𝗪🅘🅣𝓗 S𝗘RA
yg nge stlak semoga jadi jodoh sya
Made by = @WlTHJISOOLOKAL gemes bgt vee 🖤🖤 #𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒𝐁𝐁𝐐
W!th Cand!date 3💀💥
Sticker, posted without a caption
♡ ❍ ➤ㅤㅤ 𝗟𝗶𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 @victorykingg . @victory_kingg and 789.099 others ⊹ ┈─────────·𖧧·────────┈ ⊹ ─ 𖧧 special tags : @.me, @gfnyaregas, @unreallCristianYuZbf, @MYOONGI88, @ccglrnth, @iR0SEP4RK, @laflowddie, @dixypratista view all 555.678 comments 10 minutes ago 𝗟𝗶𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗷𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗵𝗮𝗻 ─────────────────────── ⌂ ⌕ ⊞ ♡ ⌫
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @memorimee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@memorimee named 24 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.
“storage.” (@memorimee). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/memorimee.
No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.