Мой личный секретарь и помощник всегда рядом во время сессий 🥹❤️🫶🏻 Контролирует работу специалиста 😁
❤2😁1

Channel
@mentalflower
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002995567892 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mentalflower |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mentalflower |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 07:30 | 49 | -1 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 22:21 | 50 | +4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 46 | +6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:45 | 40 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 40 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
80 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 34 | 42.5% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 30.0% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 8.75% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 8.75% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 1.25% | |
| 🙈 | 1 | 1.25% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mentalflower. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Мой личный секретарь и помощник всегда рядом во время сессий 🥹❤️🫶🏻 Контролирует работу специалиста 😁
❤2😁1
Десятая ловушка: «Ревнует — значит, любит» Знаете фразу «ревнует — значит, любит»? Многие слышали её от мам, подруг, а иногда и от самих ревнивых партнёров. Только вот есть нюанс: ревность — это не про любовь. Это про страх. И путать их — очень дорого. У меня была клиентка. Она пришла на консультацию с гордостью: «Мой муж меня безумно любит. Он ревнует меня к каждому столбу — с ума сходит, если я задержив…
❤5👍3🔥1🖕1
Девятая ловушка: «Он(а) исправится» Знаете такие пары, где один живёт надеждой, что второй «перебесится», «дозреет», «поймёт» и станет другим человеком? У меня была клиентка. Она встречалась с мужчиной, который, по её словам, «просто пока не раскрылся». — Он правда хороший, — говорила она. — Просто у него сложный период. Вот перейдёт на новую работу — и всё наладится. Вот съедемся — и он станет вниматель…
❤4👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
Восьмая ловушка: «У них всё лучше» Знаете такие пары, которые постят идеальные фото в соцсетях, а вы смотрите и думаете: «Почему у нас не так»? У меня была клиентка. Красивая, успешная, в отношениях пять лет. Но каждый раз на сессиях она начинала с одного и того же: — Вот смотрите, у Ленки муж каждый день смс пишет. А мой — только если я сама напишу. У Кати они раз в месяц куда-то выбираются вдвоём, а мы……
❤3👍1
Posted without readable text
👍4
🧠 Седьмая ловушка: «Мы же любим друг друга — значит, границы не нужны» Это одна из самых коварных ловушек. Она звучит красиво, романтично, почти как строчка из песни: > «В любви нет границ». > «Мы — одно целое». > «Ты должна понимать меня без слов». И именно эти фразы разрушают отношения быстрее всего. 📌 Почему границы — это про любовь, а не про холодность? Границы — это не стены. Это не про «ото…
🔥4❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🤔1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍5❤1
Еще одна ловушка: «Ты просто…» — психологические игры и треугольник Карпмана Знаете, как бывает: начинается обычный бытовой разговор, а через пять минут вы уже орёте друг на друга, хотя никто не помнит, с чего всё началось? Добро пожаловать в Треугольник Карпмана — самую популярную ловушку отношений, в которую попадают практически все пары. 📌 Что это такое? Это модель из трёх ролей: …
❤2👌1👍1
Небольшая подборка книг, которые я недавно прочитала ✨ 1. «Безмолвный пациент», Алекс Михаэлидес. Я думаю уже многие или слышали про нее или читали. Действительно рекомендую, интересный сюжет и неожиданный финал. 2. «Девы», Алекс Михаэлидес. Увлекательное чтиво, мрачное. В том же стиле. Финал снова неожиданный. 3. «За спиной», Майк Омер. Все как мне нравится: триллер, детектив, загадки, трагедии. Кон…
❤1👍1
Идем дальше: «Давай просто не будем ссориться» Знаете такие пары, которые гордо заявляют: «Мы никогда не ссоримся»? Я всегда напрягаюсь, когда слышу эту фразу. Потому что за ней обычно стоит не гармония, а избегание. — Мы взрослые люди. Мы умеем договариваться. За три года ни одной ссоры! А потом выясняется, что «договариваться» выглядело так: девушка проглатывала обиду, улыбалась и делала вид, что всё…
❤1👍1🙈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mentalflower. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ментальная клумба” (@mentalflower), 49 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentalflower.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.