Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mentavix | مِنتاویکس | روانشناسی و رشد فردی

Channel

Mentavix | مِنتاویکس | روانشناسی و رشد فردی

@mentavix

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,163subscribers

-2,233 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003390159440
TypeChannel
Username@mentavix
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mentavix

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,1637,3966,279.57 August 2026 — 7,396 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,396 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,367 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,081 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,912 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,675 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,420 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,166 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,939 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,970 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,853 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,845 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,561 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,433 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,163 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -2,233. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,828–7,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:575,163-270
14 Sept 2026, 12:555,433-128
10 Sept 2026, 14:405,561-284
5 Sept 2026, 15:385,845-8
2 Sept 2026, 02:035,853-117
30 Aug 2026, 00:185,970+31
27 Aug 2026, 09:135,939-227
24 Aug 2026, 04:226,166-254
20 Aug 2026, 10:076,420-255
17 Aug 2026, 13:276,675-237
14 Aug 2026, 06:076,912-169
10 Aug 2026, 21:517,081-286
8 Aug 2026, 05:227,367-29
7 Aug 2026, 12:327,396no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:247,396first reading

Engagement

91 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 91 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 36s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 61 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14581.0%
👌158.38%
👍84.47%
🔥84.47%
👏21.12%
💔10.559%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

گاهی ممکن است کنار کسی باشیم که دوستمان دارد، اما همچنان احساس تنهایی و نادیده گرفته شدن کنیم. چون تنهایی فقط نبودنِ آدم‌ها در اطراف ما نیست؛ گاهی یعنی احساس کنیم کسی واقعاً ما را نمی‌فهمد، نمی‌شنود یا نمی‌تواند با دنیای درونیمان ارتباط برقرار کند. 🫂 ❤️ یک رابطه‌ی سالم فقط به حضور فیزیکی نیاز ندارد؛ بلکه به توجه، گفت‌وگو، درک متقابل و ارتباط عاطفی نیاز دارد. ✨ گاهی سخت‌ترین تنهایی، وقتی است که کسی کنارت هست، اما اح

2

20 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«وقتی کسی را دوست داریم، او را همان‌طور که هست می‌بینیم، نه آن‌طور که می‌خواهیم باشد.» Irvin D. Yalom/اروین یالوم (روانپزشک و نویسنده آمریکایی) #جملات_انگیزشی @Mentavix

2

19 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC139 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

به نظرت برای ادامه دادن زندگی، باید گذشته رو فراموش کرد؟ 🤔

  1. 🔘 نه، باید بپذیریمش و ادامه بدیم58%
  2. 🔘 بعضی چیزها رو باید کاملاً رها کرد25%
  3. 🔘 بستگی به نوع خاطره داره17%
  4. 🔘 هنوز خودم جوابش رو پیدا نکردم0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC136 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

داستان امروز براتون مفید بود؟!

  1. 🔥آره خیلی جالب بود71%
  2. 👍خوب بود بد نبود0%
  3. 👎نه زیاد متوجهش نشدم29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC130 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026

گاهی یک خاطره سال‌ها در ذهن ما زنده میمونه؛ نه به این دلیل که باید در گذشته بمونیم، بلکه چون بخشی از مسیر زندگی ما بوده. رها کردن گذشته به معنی فراموش کردن نیست؛ یعنی یاد بگیریم بدون دردِ گذشته، به مسیرمون ادامه بدیم. 🌱 اگه این داستان حرفی برات داشت، برای کسی بفرست که شاید این روزها به شنیدنش نیاز داره. ❤️ @Mentavix

1

19 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC127 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

👇 برای دیدن متن کامل ویدیو، روی قسمت زیر ضربه بزنید: هر شب، پیرمردی زیر یک چراغ خاموش می‌ایستاد. یک شب، پسر جوونی ازش پرسید: «چرا هر شب اینجا وایمیستی؟» پیرمرد گفت: «سال‌ها پیش، آخرین باری که دخترم رو دیدم، همین‌جا ازش خداحافظی کردم.» پسر پرسید: «پس منتظر برگشتنش هستی؟» پیرمرد سرش رو تکان داد: «نه... فقط نمی‌خواستم آخرین خاطره‌ام ازش، یک خیابون تاریک باشه.» پسر چیزی نگفت. چند روز بعد، وقتی دوباره از اونجا رد شد

1

19 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC121 viewsread 20 August 2026

داستان کوتاه چراغ خاموش(گذشته رو نمیتونی تغییر بدی؛ ولی نگاهت رو چرا ) 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

19 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC153 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

I am becoming stronger with every difficult day. با گذر از هر روز سخت، دارم قوی‌تر میشم #بیو_انگیزشی @Mentavix

1

19 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC159 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

I protect my heart by choosing carefully who I trust. با دقت انتخاب می‌کنم به چه کسی اعتماد کنم تا از قلبم محافظت کنم. #بیو_انگیزشی @Mentavix

1💔1

19 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC187 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

همیشه نمی‌توانیم شرایط زندگی را تغییر دهیم، اما می‌توانیم نگرش و نوع واکنش خودمان به آن شرایط را تغییر دهیم. 🌱 گاهی تغییر یک طرز فکر، باعث می‌شود همان اتفاق را متفاوت ببینیم، بهتر مدیریت کنیم و تصمیم‌های بهتری بگیریم. ✨ گاهی برای تغییر زندگی، لازم نیست دنیا را تغییر بدهی؛ کافی است نگاهت به دنیا را تغییر دهی. @Mentavix

3

19 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC186 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«بزرگ‌ترین کشف هر نسل، این است که انسان می‌تواند زندگی خود را با تغییر نگرش‌هایش تغییر دهد.» William James/ویلیام جیمز (فیلسوف و روان‌شناس آمریکایی) #بیو_انگیزشی @Mentavix

2

Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @mentavix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 18 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

به نظرت برای ادامه دادن زندگی، باید گذشته رو فراموش کرد؟ 🤔

  1. 🔘 نه، باید بپذیریمش و ادامه بدیم58%
  2. 🔘 بعضی چیزها رو باید کاملاً رها کرد25%
  3. 🔘 بستگی به نوع خاطره داره17%
  4. 🔘 هنوز خودم جوابش رو پیدا نکردم0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

داستان امروز براتون مفید بود؟!

  1. 🔥آره خیلی جالب بود71%
  2. 👍خوب بود بد نبود0%
  3. 👎نه زیاد متوجهش نشدم29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

🧠 وقتی هیچ انگیزه‌ای برای انجام کاری نداری، معمولاً دلیلش چیه؟

  1. 🔘 خستگی و کمبود انرژی 😮‍💨29%
  2. 🔘 استرس و فشار ذهنی 🧠67%
  3. 🔘 خواب و استراحت ناکافی 😴19%
  4. 🔘 نمیدونم؛ بی‌دلیل پیش میاد 🤷‍♂️5%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

موضوع امروز براتون مفید بود؟!

  1. 🔥آره خیلی جالب و کاربردی بود63%
  2. 👍خوب بود اطلاعاتم بالا رفت38%
  3. 👎نه سلیقه من نبود0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTCAnonymous Poll10 voters

صادقانه بگو، موقع مواجهه با یک بحران یا فشار شدید در زندگی، معمولاً چه واکنشی داری؟ 🛡️🤔

  1. 🔘 سریع واقعیت رو میپذیرم و دنبال راه‌حل میگردم 💡30%
  2. 🔘 ذهنم درگیر «چرا من؟» میشه و طول میکشه تا آروم بشم 🌀10%
  3. 🔘 تلاش میکنم فقط روی چیزهایی که دست خودم هست تمرکز کنم 🎯30%
  4. 🔘 متأسفانه خیلی زود زیر فشار ناامید میشم و بهم می‌ریزم ⏳30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Aug 2026, 19:11 UTCAnonymous Poll5 voters

موضوع امروز براتون مفید بود؟!

  1. 🔥آره خیلی جالب و کاربردی بود80%
  2. 👍خوب بود اطلاعاتم بالا رفت20%
  3. 👎نه سلیقه من نبود0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mentavix | مِنتاویکس | روانشناسی و رشد فردی” (@mentavix), 5,163 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentavix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.