Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Merediana Web — Portal.

Channel

Merediana Web — Portal.

@meredianaweb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

531subscribers

-582 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003916380136
TypeChannel
Username@meredianaweb
Created29 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/meredianaweb

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

53110,5135,5227 August 2026 — 1,113 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,073 subscribers10 August 2026 — 898 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,513 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,486 subscribers19 August 2026 — 734 subscribers27 August 2026 — 640 subscribers2 September 2026 — 574 subscribers10 September 2026 — 555 subscribers19 September 2026 — 531 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 43 days, net -582. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:37531-24
10 Sept 2026, 22:18555-19
2 Sept 2026, 22:19574-66
27 Aug 2026, 04:45640-94
19 Aug 2026, 16:13734-9,752
18 Aug 2026, 16:2210,486-27
17 Aug 2026, 14:5410,513+9,615
10 Aug 2026, 00:02898-175
7 Aug 2026, 10:421,073-40
7 Aug 2026, 01:311,113first reading

Engagement

3 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4448.4%
👍2426.4%
🔥2325.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 19:35 UTC212 views14 reactionsread 19 August 2026

ты целуешь мою шею называешь меня принц

6👍4🔥4

29 Jun 2026, 22:59 UTC≈5,770 views77 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Video

🤩 Личность: Onegin / Онегин › Контакт: @loading | ID 7720205301 › Начало карьеры: 06.2021 — Являюсь квалифицированным специлистом в области Информационной Безопасности и OSINT-Индустрии. Демонстрация деятельности находится в сообществе Merediana. Имею сертификаты от следующих компаний: › Касперский | КиберЁж › CodeBy | 8More 🤩 Исполняю информационную и техническую деятельность в следующих организациях и государст

38👍20🔥19

Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @meredianaweb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@meredianaweb edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Merediana Web — Portal.” (@meredianaweb), 531 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meredianaweb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.