Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ

Channel
@meria99m
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
10,455subscribers
-56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001216504366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meria99m |
| Created | 13 September 2018 โ measured โ cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meria99m |
Memes & entertainment โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 10,455 | -3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 10,458 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 10,468 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 10,472 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 10,473 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 10,476 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 10,481 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 10,478 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 10,480 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:28 | 10,484 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 10,486 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:29 | 10,488 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 10,486 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 10,487 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 10,488 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 10,486 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 10,491 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 10,489 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 10,490 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 10,496 | first reading |
108 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 108 (27 July 2026 โ 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 37,946 |
| Reactions total | โ |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
ุตุจุงุญ ุงูุฎูุฑุ ูู ุง ุงุณุชุณูู ุช ู ู ูุฃุณู ูููู โูุญูู ูุฑุงุญุฉู ู ู ุฎุงุถู ุญุฑุจูุง.
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
โโ ุฃู ุชุดุน ุญูุงุชู ุจุงููููุฑ ูู ุง ูู ุฃููุง ุดู ุณ ููุทูู ุจูุง ุงูุญูุจ ูุทููู ุงูููุงูุจ ูุชูู ุณูู ูู ุฑูููุฉ ูุฐู ุงูุญูุงุฉ ููุชุญูู ูู ู ุง ุฒุฑุนุชู ู ู ุจุฐูุฑ ุฎูุฑ ุฅูู ุจุณุงุชูู ู ู ุงููุฑูุฏ โ.
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
ู ุณุงุก ุงูุฎูุฑุ โ ุณูุฑู ุฃูุนุฑุฌ ุ ุฎูุฑ ู ู ุชูููู ุนุงุฌุฒ โ.
Signed ๐๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐บ
Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @meria99m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ|| ๐ฌ๐พe๐ฌ ||๐ชดโ (@meria99m), 10,455 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meria99m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.