Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -18,693. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,422–48,723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 00:19
27,226
-1,476
17 Sept 2026, 20:17
28,702
-447
15 Sept 2026, 18:02
29,149
-636
14 Sept 2026, 00:59
29,785
-690
12 Sept 2026, 05:41
30,475
-651
9 Sept 2026, 23:20
31,126
-896
6 Sept 2026, 13:36
32,022
-697
4 Sept 2026, 07:21
32,719
-360
2 Sept 2026, 17:16
33,079
-1,395
1 Sept 2026, 19:25
34,474
-156
31 Aug 2026, 22:37
34,630
-84
30 Aug 2026, 23:33
34,714
-288
29 Aug 2026, 23:54
35,002
-425
29 Aug 2026, 03:27
35,427
-518
28 Aug 2026, 00:43
35,945
-258
27 Aug 2026, 02:11
36,203
-242
26 Aug 2026, 05:15
36,445
-496
25 Aug 2026, 07:25
36,941
-414
24 Aug 2026, 04:42
37,355
-1,193
22 Aug 2026, 10:57
38,548
first reading
Engagement
674 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.65%
avg views ÷ 27,226 subscribers
Avg views / post
450
265 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
265
of 674 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
674 (7 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
119,368
Reactions total
1,700
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 04s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,866 reactions across 672 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
403
14.1%
🥰
331
11.5%
😍
327
11.4%
👍
317
11.1%
🔥
202
7.05%
💯
195
6.80%
🤩
165
5.76%
🎉
162
5.65%
😘
149
5.20%
❤🔥
107
3.73%
🕊
76
2.65%
🙏
68
2.37%
👌
67
2.34%
👏
66
2.30%
🐳
64
2.23%
⚡
61
2.13%
🏆
56
1.95%
😁
50
1.74%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 672 of the 674 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,866 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 674 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
USDT PAYOUTS for our investors who invested in PUMP TRADE.
Enjoy and keep participating with us for maximum RETURNS.
This focus effort allows you to experiment with various ideas and techniques in a low-pressure environment, ultimately refining your approaches and gaining valuable insights without the risk associated with live trading. Remember, our XAUUSD TRADES are running massively in the PREMIUM VIP. Secure you…
Attention Investors:
Payouts are currently ongoing. Please ensure your wallet address is correct to avoid any loss of funds, as we won’t be responsible for incorrect details.
Thank you for your cooperation. 💯
☀️ Sunday Thoughts | A New Week Doesn't Need a Perfect Start
Sunday evening always brings a familiar feeling. A new trading week is about to begin, and naturally, we start thinking about what the market might do next.
But before looking forward, I like to look back.
Every week leaves us with something, sometimes a good lesson, sometimes a mistake, and sometimes simply a better understanding of ourselves.
I've lea…
⭐ CUSTOMER FEEDBACK:
All of our clients have one simple wish – to earn extra income 💵
Because everyone is always thinking about a raise that could really change their life
Most of our clients have big families and constantly face unexpected expenses
In moments like that, it’s important to have a backup option – that passive income that helps you stay calm
⭐️ Oscar is exactly that kind of person
Life with two kids …
⭐ CUSTOMER FEEDBACK:
💱 You get a trading bot running your account automatically, a VPS keeping it stable around the clock and a personal asset manager who sets everything up from scratch and stays with you long after
🔗 setup takes ten minutes and your account trades from the next session
A strong milestone for one of our clients — $3,200 reward from FTMO 🏆
The robot handled the trading process while the account progressed all the way to payout💰
Another great result to add to the collection 🤖
More info →
🟤🌱 INVESTMENT PLAN FOR ALL TRADERS 🔥
24-HOUR PLAN (payout delivered at the end of the trading day )
💷 £500 ➡️ 💰 Target: £5,000
💷 £1,000 ➡️ 💰 Target: £10,000
💷 £3,000 ➡️ 💰 Target: £30,000
💷 £5,000 ➡️ 💰 Target: £50,000
48- HOUR PLAN (payout delivered at the end of second day of trading )
For ballers, executives & group associations
💷 £10,000 ➡️ 💰 Target: £100,000
💷 £15,000 ➡️ 💰 Target: £150,000
💷 £20,000 ➡️ 💰 Tar…
🐳1🔥1😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 674 posts we hold for @metatrader5signalshub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@metatrader5signalshub edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“META TRADER 4&5 FOREX SIGNALS” (@metatrader5signalshub), 27,226 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metatrader5signalshub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.