Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for META TRADER 4&5 FOREX SIGNALS

Channel

META TRADER 4&5 FOREX SIGNALS

@metetradersignals

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

85,733subscribers

-65,246 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135388628
TypeChannel
Username@metetradersignals
Description🔹Daily Forex Signals 🔹Guaranteed investment service 🔹Beat Forex Market with us 🌀Stay on our free channel if you're interested in getting amazing signals daily with up to 98% accuracy for free🌀 https://t.me/CustomerserviceAdmin
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/metetradersignals

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

15.2 average views per post against 85,733 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.018%. Across the 3,690 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,629–99,947 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.71% and 11.0%, with a median of 5.10%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (26 August 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Posts measured270 of 271 published in the window (270 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled4,104
Mature posts only0.021% over 102 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers85,733 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 3,690 channels · p10 0.395% · p25 1.71% · p50 5.10% · p75 11.0% · p90 21.6%
Position in cohort0.651th percentile · 1/333 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.034% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 25 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

85,733150,979118,3567 August 2026 — 150,979 subscribers7 August 2026 — 150,979 subscribers8 August 2026 — 150,556 subscribers9 August 2026 — 149,754 subscribers10 August 2026 — 149,152 subscribers10 August 2026 — 148,540 subscribers12 August 2026 — 147,266 subscribers13 August 2026 — 146,640 subscribers14 August 2026 — 146,170 subscribers15 August 2026 — 145,506 subscribers17 August 2026 — 143,999 subscribers18 August 2026 — 143,317 subscribers19 August 2026 — 131,160 subscribers20 August 2026 — 130,877 subscribers21 August 2026 — 108,737 subscribers22 August 2026 — 107,600 subscribers24 August 2026 — 105,276 subscribers25 August 2026 — 103,501 subscribers26 August 2026 — 98,815 subscribers27 August 2026 — 96,529 subscribers28 August 2026 — 95,660 subscribers29 August 2026 — 94,528 subscribers30 August 2026 — 93,820 subscribers31 August 2026 — 93,305 subscribers1 September 2026 — 92,895 subscribers2 September 2026 — 92,384 subscribers3 September 2026 — 91,735 subscribers5 September 2026 — 91,065 subscribers8 September 2026 — 90,038 subscribers11 September 2026 — 89,083 subscribers13 September 2026 — 87,632 subscribers15 September 2026 — 86,782 subscribers16 September 2026 — 86,247 subscribers19 September 2026 — 85,733 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -65,246. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,946–160,766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:2185,733-514
16 Sept 2026, 19:4186,247-535
15 Sept 2026, 00:3886,782-850
13 Sept 2026, 11:3687,632-1,451
11 Sept 2026, 12:0189,083-955
8 Sept 2026, 20:5690,038-1,027
5 Sept 2026, 11:5891,065-670
3 Sept 2026, 10:5791,735-649
2 Sept 2026, 07:2492,384-511
1 Sept 2026, 04:3592,895-410
31 Aug 2026, 06:5593,305-515
30 Aug 2026, 08:4393,820-708
29 Aug 2026, 11:3594,528-1,132
28 Aug 2026, 15:0395,660-869
27 Aug 2026, 17:0396,529-2,286
26 Aug 2026, 13:3898,815-4,686
25 Aug 2026, 11:34103,501-1,775
24 Aug 2026, 10:12105,276-2,324
22 Aug 2026, 17:24107,600-1,137
21 Aug 2026, 08:43108,737first reading

Engagement

481 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.018%
avg views ÷ 85,733 subscribers
Avg views / post
15.2
270 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
271
of 481 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 270 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held481 (5 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total4,104
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23,100
Videos
≈574
Links
≈480

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 25 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1445.2%
💯722.6%
🔥516.1%
🎉26.45%
👍26.45%
👏13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 481 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 481 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 12:58 UTC18 viewsread 24 September 2026
Photo

HIT TP 1 ✅ +20 PIPS Scalper trader can close now. Who wanna hold do set BE for 0% risk.

24 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC17 viewsread 24 September 2026

GOLD SELL NOW IN ZONE 4279.00-4286.00 (SCALPING) TP 1 : 4277.00 TP 2 : 4275.00 TP 3 : OPEN SL : 4289.00

24 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTC15 viewsread 24 September 2026

Gold Buy now : 4268-4262 stop loss : 4258.50 take profit 1 : 4277 take profit 2 : 4284 take care of your money management

24 Sept 2026, 12:15 UTC17 viewsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Hit TP1 86pips Only instant buy a few minutes gold smashed tp1 just like that! 🫵🏻🔥

24 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC19 viewsread 24 September 2026
Photo

HIT TP1 180PIPS ✅ Scalper close now, Hold to TP make sure Be your Entries ‼️

24 Sept 2026, 10:35 UTC18 viewsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Running profit 60pips ✅ Scalper close now, Hold to TP make sure Be your Entries ‼️

24 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC18 viewsread 24 September 2026

gold buy now : 4250 sl : 4240 tp 1st: 4260 tp 2nd: 4270 Use Proper Entry & Money Management

24 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC17 viewsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Running profit 50pips Scalper close now, Hold to TP make sure Be your Entries

Showing the 12 most recent of 481 posts we hold for @metetradersignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

META TRADER 5 SIGNALS
@meta_trader5_signal · 10,358
#1
Xauusd Signal Expert
@XauusdExpertSignal_13 · 1,100
#2
𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙆𝙄𝙉𝙂'𝙎 𝙊𝙁 𝙁𝙊𝙍𝙀𝙓
@JoanGoldTrad01 · 961 (as read 15 August 2026)
#3
Forex Signals Golds
@signals_fx · 9,815
#4
VIC-FOREX
@vicforexgo · 5,152
#5
THE GOLDEN GARRY
@thegoldengarry_official0 · 78,290
#6
GOLD FOREX TRADERS
@goldenforexxtraders1 · 752
#7
Gold hunters club
@XAUProSignal7 · 133
#8
META TRADER 5 SIGNALS 🎖🏆
@meta5tradersofficial · 42,382
#9
📈SMART SIGNAL FOREX-FREE 📊
@SMARTSIGNALFOREX · 1,461
#10
𝗔𝗟𝗘𝗬 𝗚𝗢𝗟𝗗 𝗧𝗥𝗔𝗗𝗜𝗡𝗚
@AleyGoldTrading · 1,863 (as read 15 August 2026)
#11
ALTURK TRADER FX ||أحمد الترك
@ALTURKFX · 1,744
#12
EMBE SCALPER 📊
@MbScalping0 · 129 (as read 15 August 2026)
#13
XAUUSD KING
@fxprofitignal_21 · 727 (as read 15 August 2026)
#14
SYNTHETICX SIGNALS
@SYNTHETICXSIGNAL1 · 33,928
#15
Henry Golddigger
@HenryGoldTraderFx_01 · 9,635
#16
💎 FxPeople 💎 Señales y Educación 🌍
@FxPeopleFree · 659
#17
GOLD US30/KILLER
@GOLDUS30KILLER30 · 1,151 (as read 15 August 2026)
#18
🌀Meta Trader 5 signal Forex.
@MetaTrader5MT · 6,885
#19
Forex and bitcoin trading💰💰
@Binary_Fx_trading1 · 1,044
#20
META TRADER 4 Fullmargin⋆️
@meta_trader_4_signal · 37,919
#21
tastyfx 📈📉📈📉
@Lucymark08 · 2,142
#22
FX super
@forexsignalsolutions · 2
#23
📊💰GREEN PIPS FINDER💰📊
@GreenPipsFinder · 1,905
#24
MAFIA MARKET
@GoldenkingFx1 · 5,193
#25
The Big
@thebig_90 · 1,268
#26
Web3coach Crew
@cryptoenthusiastarena · 407
#27
AngelTrades FX Community💙📈📉
@Angeltrades00 · 445
#28
SparkerForexmarket
@SparkerFxx · 336
#29
BOTAK FX 🇮🇩
@botaktrade · 1,619
#30
میثم بلوری ارزدیجیتال
@meysambolouri1 · 2,051
#31
Star Network Official Channel
@starnetwork_official · 47,050
#32
Ozzie’s Trading Spellbook 📚
@ozziestradingspellbook · 6,537
#33
Uychi tumani 27-sonli umumiy oʻrta taʼlim maktabi
@uychi27maktab · 288
#34
Piense y Hágase Rico
@librosdericos · 3,987
#35
عَبدُالرَّحْمٰن
@abedalrahmanyhia · 593
#36
🫧♡اونجا که میگه♡🫧
@myHertbet1 · 4,623
#37
أسئلة 63🔻"دفعة أحمد فوزي وكريم حمدي وإسراء عبد النبي وزينب عزام رحمة الله عليهم 🇵🇸"
@medendgame63 · 4,199
#38
PREMIERSKILLSETHIOPIA
@PSETHIOOO · 1,382
#39
Ninja Trader 8 Cracked "Indicators" FREE
@ninjatrader8cracked · 3,790
#40
SKILLED_PROXY
@skilled_proxy · 1,878
#41

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

META TRADER 5 SIGNALS 🎖🏆
@meta5tradersofficial · 42,382
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 26 August 2026
SYNTHETICX SIGNALS
@SYNTHETICXSIGNAL1 · 33,928
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 19 August 2026
THE GOLDEN GARRY
@thegoldengarry_official0 · 78,290
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 15 August 2026
Star Network Official Channel
@starnetwork_official · 47,050
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“META TRADER 4&5 FOREX SIGNALS” (@metetradersignals), 85,733 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/metetradersignals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.