Channel
@mettekoppelaar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
958subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001865116345 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mettekoppelaar |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mettekoppelaar |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 958 | -6 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 20:39 | 964 | +3 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 961 | +3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 958 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 957 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 962 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 959 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 960 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 958 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 958 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 5 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
143 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 128 | 89.5% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 4.90% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.80% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.40% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.699% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.699% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Why I miss touch Spending the summer in a communal living place is bringing me a lot, but there’s something I deeply miss: touch. I notice how the lack of touch affects my nervous system. It can make me feel unsettled and alone. It takes me into my head and out of my body. A fellow resident told me that she avoids touch to prevent getting stuck in unpleasant situations. In other words, it doesn’t feel safe. There’…
❤15
Why I’ve been silent — and what’s coming 🛤️ Four months ago, when I last posted here, I was drowning a little. I was holding three different group containers, finding an ending to a lovely romantic connection, and getting ready to start traveling. By the end of April, I could finally take a break. I spent time with my dad and brother, visited friends, and then headed to Portugal, where I’ve been staying at a place c…
❤27🔥2👍1
Sex as a portal — free zoom call Tuesday 31 March 2026, 19:30 – 21:30 CET Which life skills can improve your sexual experience? And what does sexuality reveal about your life? In this free online workshop, you'll learn new concepts, try them in small exercises, and connect with other curious humans. Join as a standalone experience, or as a first taste of the 22–26 April 2026 retreat in Berlin: Rebirthing the Sensua…
❤5🍌1🍓1
4 things many people don't know about sensual/se⨉-positive retreats: 🧘♀️ 1. Everything is built on safety If people aren’t collectively invested in the well-being of others (by considering their perspective) and themselves (by letting themselves skip exercises, open a window, say no, or ask for help), whatever else happens won’t really work. When safety is co-created like this, the nervous system can shift from p…
❤9
The intake calls for my sensual retreat reveal so much humanity. I ask: “When someone does something you don’t like, how do you respond?” Many people say: “I withdraw and avoid that person.” When I ask: “And when something in my facilitation isn’t working for you?” Many people draw a blank. So I explain: “You can interrupt me and say you zoned out and didn’t hear what I said. I want you to ask for help—especiall…
❤15🥰2
“Spots are filling up fast.” As an organizer, this is such a tempting phrase to post. People are in doubt. They say that they might join. But I still have a bunch of free spots and I would love to be sold out. So let’s create a little FOMO. Let’s create a little pressure. And maybe more will join. “I would LOVE it if you joined” is another one. In conversation with a potential participant, it’s so tempting to poi…
❤14👍2🥰2
Permission to Want After two beautiful gatherings (focused on fulfillment and emotion), next week’s Community Gathering (Wednesday, 25 Feb in Berlin) turns toward desire. Is it okay to want things? Is it okay to ask for them? Is it still okay if others don’t want the same? How can you feel safe while asking for something edgy? How do you stay open when you risk receiving a no? Come explore it with us this Wednesda…
❤4🥰1
The way you navigate sexuality can reflect how you navigate honesty, emotional and physical expression, voicing desires, saying no, and regulating your nervous system. Sex is such a mirror — and also such an opportunity to see where your expression can become more aligned, so you can create deeper intimacy and connection — with anyone, and regardless of what happens on a physical level. ✨ 2 Free Zoom Calls ✨ I’ll…
❤10👍1🥰1
Isn't it wild that, as teenagers, so many of us believe we're supposed to be “good” at se⨉? It's sad, but not surprising. Se⨉ education focuses on condoms, pregnancy, and disease. The public narrative centers how often we do it, how long we last, how many people we've been with, and how many orgasms we have. No wonder se⨉uality becomes performative. Sometimes I wonder what l'd tell my 16-year-old self about all thi…
❤29🥰1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @mettekoppelaar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mette’s Experiments 🧪✨” (@mettekoppelaar), 958 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mettekoppelaar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.