Qu’est ce que vous en pensez ?

Channel
Meusstradamos
@meusstradamos
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,496subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002951586324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @meusstradamos |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/meusstradamos |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 4,496 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 4,497 | +16 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 4,481 | +15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 4,466 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 4,468 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 4,464 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 4,459 | +2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 4,457 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:09 | 4,459 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 4,462 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 4,471 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 4,472 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 4,472 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 40m 49s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 26 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
295 reactions across 25 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 18.3% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 16.6% | |
| 🥰 | 30 | 10.2% | |
| 😱 | 28 | 9.49% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 5.42% | |
| 🙏 | 16 | 5.42% | |
| 🤣 | 15 | 5.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 4.07% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 2.71% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 2.71% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 2.37% | |
| 😢 | 7 | 2.37% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 2.03% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 1.69% | |
| 🤗 | 5 | 1.69% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 😨 | 4 | 1.36% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 1.02% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 1.02% | |
| 9 further kinds | 11 | 3.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Regardez moi cette trompette des réseaux 😂 Sarah appelle les deks. Quelle homme laisse sa femme seule comme çà. TDC
Les calculs sont pas bons kevin... Fun fact il a dit 😂 Ce qui est factuel c’est qu’on peut voir bien plus loin que 30km avec un appareil photo simple qui a un bon zoom. C’est donc la preuve que leurs calculs ne sont pas bons... J’attend ceux qui vont défendent le globe alors que toutes les preuves sont là 😉
👍8😁1
Les dragons étaient présent dans les anciens dictionnaires
👍2🥰1😱1
Bassem confronté chez lui après avoir envoyé des menaces de mort en privé. "Apelle les gendarmes" Sa réaction montre bien qui il est vraiment
🤡6💩1
Bonne journée à tous 🤗
🥰4❤2👍1
(2010) Casey, ca cétait du rap... Quand on vous dit que c'était mieux avant... Loin de notre époque aux rappeurs ratés qui vendent leurs âmes pour faire + de ventes.
🔥6👏4
La sorcellerie est vraiment omniprésente 👀
😱10😨4💔2🥴1
T'offrirais ça à ton gamin ?
🙏9🙈3🔥1😱1
Bonne journée à tous 🤗
❤12🙏1
Map de 1587 👀
🥰9👍6
Une bombe monumentale se prépare. Vous allez être choqué, les complotistes que nous sommes avions encore raison. On vous avez prévenu mais vous avez préféré faire confiance à vos bourreaux. C’est vraiment terrible, le maquillage est impeccable. C’est carrément flippant. 😱
😱9❤3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @meusstradamos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Meusstradamos” (@meusstradamos), 4,496 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/meusstradamos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.