Channel
@mfz_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
494subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002081685629 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mfz_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mfz_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 494 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 498 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 500 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 501 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 501 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
23 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 52.2% | |
| custom 5246828303305678732 | 5 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5330468685406550929 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5436062865855359364 | 2 | 8.70% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что делать? Куда идти? Кому звонить? <2000 п.п. Чего?? Всех поздравляю, вы увидели черного лебедя на рынке. Не каждому выпадает шанс такого, но вас он не обошел. Что это значит? Видно, что рынок находился в неопределенности последние полгода, как минимум. Не было четкого понимания, пойдет он ниже или выше, было только одно - вправо. И вот все решилось очень резко и сильно, рынок просто беостановочно начал фигачить …
А как проходит ваше лето? Скидывайте фотки 🏖
custom 52468283033056787322
А так вообще я сейчас полностью в ИИ, разработке и прочем 🍤 Поднимаем сервисы, внедряю ИИ в команды и бизнесы и бесконечно обучаюсь И школу по ИИ сейчас запускаем 🥁 В общем, есть чем заниматься помимо рынков. Но получать с рынка 0$ это конечно непривычно.
Рассказал свое мнение по всем рынкам, за которыми слежу 🤟🤟🤟 Рассказывайте, что думаете сами и что делаете
Video, posted without a caption
👍6
Деньги есть, только в крипту их никто не несет
custom 52468283033056787321
Эх, вот бы сейчас просто одну хорошую среднесрочную позу на 50+%, а не вот это вот все
custom 54360628658553593642
Опа, вдруг неожиданно https://youtu.be/eQtH-0JdciI?si=S4W-wEHhh21nCXHP
👍4
USDT?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вот и USDT 77₽ Как говорится, «каждый мог»
вот щас он может сразу вниз пойти, до 50-40к. В течении месяца а может затянуть с отскоком. Но тогда это будет еще на пару месяцев а потом еще падать пару месяцев. Короче долго.
custom 53304686854065509291
Криптовалюта Toncoin теперь будет называться «Gram», однако название блокчейна TON остаётся прежним. Это четвёртый из семи шагов в рамках инициативы «Сделать TON снова великим», — сообщил основатель Telegram Павел Дуров.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mfz_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
USDT?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ну и по традиции
The shares total 131%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 18 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MFZ - CRYPTO” (@mfz_crypto), 494 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mfz_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.