Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Многонационал. Экономика

Channel

Многонационал. Экономика

@mgnzecon

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

53,497subscribers

+5,344 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002475110780
TypeChannel
Username@mgnzecon
DescriptionВажное об экономике без воды, факты и аналитика. Обратная связь, предложка, сотрудничество: @svytos Реклама: @mgnzadvs Основной канал: @mnogonazi РКН: https://clck.ru/3FW6Sx
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mgnzecon

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

48,05353,49750,7756 August 2026 — 48,153 subscribers6 August 2026 — 48,153 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,151 subscribers7 August 2026 — 48,130 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,132 subscribers9 August 2026 — 48,122 subscribers10 August 2026 — 48,107 subscribers11 August 2026 — 48,100 subscribers12 August 2026 — 48,080 subscribers14 August 2026 — 48,063 subscribers15 August 2026 — 48,062 subscribers16 August 2026 — 48,053 subscribers17 August 2026 — 48,803 subscribers18 August 2026 — 49,919 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,443 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,516 subscribers21 August 2026 — 50,541 subscribers22 August 2026 — 50,562 subscribers24 August 2026 — 50,572 subscribers25 August 2026 — 50,573 subscribers26 August 2026 — 50,543 subscribers27 August 2026 — 50,503 subscribers28 August 2026 — 50,485 subscribers29 August 2026 — 50,489 subscribers30 August 2026 — 50,606 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,796 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,806 subscribers2 September 2026 — 50,802 subscribers3 September 2026 — 50,794 subscribers5 September 2026 — 50,769 subscribers8 September 2026 — 50,723 subscribers11 September 2026 — 50,683 subscribers13 September 2026 — 50,656 subscribers15 September 2026 — 51,217 subscribers16 September 2026 — 53,368 subscribers19 September 2026 — 53,497 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 44 days, net +5,344. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,236–54,314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:5553,497+129
16 Sept 2026, 19:4153,368+2,151
15 Sept 2026, 01:0151,217+561
13 Sept 2026, 08:4250,656-27
11 Sept 2026, 08:3950,683-40
8 Sept 2026, 15:1750,723-46
5 Sept 2026, 12:0050,769-25
3 Sept 2026, 15:1550,794-8
2 Sept 2026, 09:5250,802-4
1 Sept 2026, 07:2650,806+10
31 Aug 2026, 09:4450,796+190
30 Aug 2026, 12:3750,606+117
29 Aug 2026, 11:0550,489+4
28 Aug 2026, 08:0350,485-18
27 Aug 2026, 08:1850,503-40
26 Aug 2026, 10:2350,543-30
25 Aug 2026, 09:5850,573+1
24 Aug 2026, 12:4750,572+10
22 Aug 2026, 23:4650,562+21
21 Aug 2026, 14:2550,541first reading

Engagement

352 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 53,497 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,300
209 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
209
of 352 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held352 (4 August 202621 September 2026)
Views total2,996,440
Reactions total179,071
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 04:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,120
Videos
636
Links
5,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
44m 01s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 53 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

279,016 reactions across 343 posts, in 68 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬52,83618.9%
🤡48,91517.5%
👍34,07412.2%
🤣30,46810.9%
😁27,3079.79%
💯13,0814.69%
🤮11,6154.16%
🔥10,3063.69%
🤔9,5503.42%
5,7332.05%
💩3,7771.35%
😱3,6541.31%
😡3,2861.18%
👏2,6240.94%
🤯2,5990.931%
💊2,5960.93%
🙈2,3320.836%
😢2,0050.719%
🤷‍♂1,6160.579%
🥴1,4510.52%
48 further kinds9,1913.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 352 of the 352 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286,230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 352 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
105
across the posts below
Posts paid on
36
of 352 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
40
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mgnzecon. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 352 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC≈7,530 views435 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Минфин РФ прорабатывает изменения налогового законодательства в плане учета расходов на оборону и восстановление объектов, пострадавших от атак дронов, и их последующий ремонт. Судя по всему, речь идёт не о новых налогах на восстановление (как уже пишут в некоторых каналах), а о каких-то налоговых льготах для пострадавших. «Мы сейчас совместно с представителями различных отраслей прорабатываем, какие требуются изме

🤡261🤔67🤬33😁33👍23💩6🍌5🍾3

21 Sept 2026, 14:54 UTC≈12,700 views1,310 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Олигархов Алишера Усманов и Михаила Фридман исключат из санкционного списка ЕС Люксембург присоединился к Словакии и Франции в споре о продлении персональных санкций ЕС против России и требует исключить из списка олигархов Фридмана и Усманова. В частности, Франция объяснила свою позицию соображениями национальной безопасности. Для продления режима санкций необходима единогласная поддержка всех 27 государств-членов

🤬792🤡265😁97🤮81🤣40🥴14🌭6😍5

21 Sept 2026, 12:04 UTC≈13,700 views904 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

МЫ СДЕЛАЛИ ДЕФИЦИТ БЮДЖЕТА ОКОЛО 2% ОТ ВВП И СОГЛАСОВАЛИ С ЦБ — СИЛУАНОВ СИЛУАНОВ: СДЕЛАЛИ ВСЕ СО СТОРОНЫ БЮДЖЕТНОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ, ЧТОБЫ ЦБ МОГ СМЯГЧАТЬ ДКП Подписаться | Предложить новость

🤡655💩138🎃47🤔23🤣12😁10🙈7👍4

21 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC≈14,500 views1,110 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Миронов всё-таки дозвонился и у СР есть 5%. Кстати, это хорошо. Подписаться | Предложить новость

😁713💩166💯104🤡42🤣33👍31🥴8😢6

21 Sept 2026, 08:02 UTC≈16,200 views2,202 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

«Единая Россия» в Госдуме IX созыва получает не просто конституционное большинство, а самую большую фракцию в своей истории, следует из последних предварительных данных, опубликованных Центризбиркомом. ▪️Если «Справедливая Россия» все-таки преодолеет отметку в 5%, то «Единая Россия» по партийным спискам сможет получить 139 из 225 депутатских мест. ▪️Вторую по численности фракцию в таком случае сформирует КПРФ — 33

🤮1,380🤡394💩193🤬82😢45🤣38👍3217

21 Sept 2026, 07:06 UTC≈16,100 views1,168 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video

В Петербурге пенсионерка накопила и отдала мошенникам 8 кг золота и 100 млн рублей. Неизвестные позвонили старушке, представились сотрудниками спецслужб и убедили передать им деньги и золото якобы для «проверки». Правоохранители возбудили уголовное дело о мошенничестве. Одну из подозреваемых уже задержали. Подписаться | Предложить новость

😱556🙉268🤯156🤣80😁58😡19👏15🥴7

20 Sept 2026, 19:18 UTC≈18,100 views1,170 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

А вот общие результаты, которые у НЛ оказались в 2 раза хуже чем по ДЭГ. Почему так? Потому что вся их кампания в этом году это кринж и позор. В России нет запроса на лево-либеральную повестку, потому что её сторонники — это внесистемная оппозиция. Очередное тому доказательство. Но будут ли сделаны выводы? Сомневаюсь, НЛ не сможет, ДЭГ поможет. Тьфу. Подписаться | Предложить новость

🤬699💯315🤡75😁19👀14🤣1211🔥9

20 Sept 2026, 18:58 UTC≈17,700 views1,463 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Результаты электронного голосования удивили. Обратите внимание на НЛ. На втором скрине данные на прошлых выборах в 2021 году. Имеющий логическое мышление всё поймёт. Кстати, думаю что уже можно сказать, что я голосовал за ЛДПР, не потому что всё устраивает, а потому что это меньшее из зол. Ещё год назад голосовал бы за НЛ, но то во что это превратилось, это какой-то позор. Подписаться | Предложить новость

🤬706💯553🔥56🤡43🤮29👀24😁1914

20 Sept 2026, 09:03 UTC≈18,100 views1,153 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Хочу пояснить позицию. Я вообще не агитирую ни за какую из партий, просто не хочу заниматься агитацией. Мои личные табу описывал здесь. Голосуйте так как считаете нужным, только не обманывайте себя и других протестным терпильством, это не работает. Подписаться | Предложить новость

👍690💯278🔥71🤡44💩2520🤣13🤝5

20 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC≈18,300 views1,652 reactions3 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Яблоко. В итоге просто слили голоса. Не приход на выборы, испорченный бюллетень и прочее протестное терпильство = голос за ЕР. Реальная ситуация такова, что нужно идти и выбирать из зол меньшее, остальное инфантилизм. Подписаться | Предложить новость

💯1,340🤡178😁36🤣2516💩16🤮15👍12

20 Sept 2026, 05:34 UTC≈18,200 views2,749 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Премьер-министр Армении Никол Пашинян назвал Россию лучшим партнером для строительства новой станции метро «Ачапняк» в Ереване. По его словам, сотрудничество с российской стороной позволит продолжить расширение сети с минимальными сложностями. Ранее Пашинян просил передать концессию на железные дороги Армении другой стране, при том, что РЖД вложила в них более 30 млрд рублей. Подписаться | Предложить новость

🤡1,790🤣374🤬347🤮117🍌37🙈31💩18🤯18

19 Sept 2026, 20:49 UTC≈18,200 views416 reactionsread 22 September 2026

Друзья, в это непростое время будем вам почаще напоминать, что нужно обязательно подписаться на все каналы нашей сетки, чтобы никогда не потерять связь 1. Основа @mnogonazi 2. Зеркало основы, работает на всех устройствах ⬇️ https://t.me/+HhNPepa-jT85NDFi 3. Канал про экономику @mgnzecon 4. Международные новости @mnogonazi_world Подписывайтесь и расскажите друзьям!

235👍150🔥21🤣4🫡3🤡2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 352 posts we hold for @mgnzecon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Sept 2026, 17:24 UTCAnonymous Poll43,300 voters approx.

Поддержим?

  1. Да62%
  2. Да, но следом пусть и всех мигрантов37%
  3. Нет1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTCAnonymous Poll4,360 voters approx.

Делаем разбор доклада Клепача?

  1. Да96%
  2. Нет4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTCFinal Results6,430 voters approx.

Пойдёте голосовать?

  1. Да70%
  2. Нет30%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 352 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Многонационал. Экономика” (@mgnzecon), 53,497 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mgnzecon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.