Отправлять цитаты преподавателей можно сюда https://vk.com/mgtupage @Sendbaumanbot
Сотрудничество @freetelpr
Купить рекламу: https://telega.in/c/mgtupage
Все персонажи являются вымышленными и любое совпадение случайно.
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
6,050 average views per post against 6,340 subscribers — an engagement rate of 95.5%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
108,930
Mature posts only
99.5% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net +195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,110–6,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 11:56
6,339
-1
2 Nov 2026, 16:29
6,340
+6
30 Oct 2026, 13:36
6,334
+2
27 Oct 2026, 23:10
6,332
-4
25 Oct 2026, 02:38
6,336
+6
21 Oct 2026, 21:04
6,330
-5
18 Oct 2026, 11:35
6,335
+8
15 Oct 2026, 18:28
6,327
+16
12 Oct 2026, 12:29
6,311
+12
5 Oct 2026, 18:18
6,299
-5
28 Sept 2026, 02:56
6,304
+15
18 Sept 2026, 20:01
6,289
+17
14 Sept 2026, 14:38
6,272
+16
10 Sept 2026, 23:57
6,256
+19
6 Sept 2026, 09:00
6,237
+10
2 Sept 2026, 10:37
6,227
+21
30 Aug 2026, 16:25
6,206
+20
28 Aug 2026, 00:45
6,186
+17
24 Aug 2026, 16:58
6,169
+7
17 Aug 2026, 17:54
6,162
first reading
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
92.0%
avg views ÷ 6,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,830
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
41 (28 April 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
99,110
Reactions total
2,027
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
83
Links
112
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,604 reactions across 39 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,604
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 41 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mgtupage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 April 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.44%
1 of 41 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,030
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
8,780
over 40 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqxXnztD
1
26 October 2026
26 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 17 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Московские студенты теперь в Telegram (Первые 300 участников уже с нами!)
Из опубликованного: карьерная программа в в JTI, BESTALKS в МГТУ, студенческий кейс-чемпионат «Код города», приём работ на НИРС — 2026 в НИУ ВШЭ и др.
Приглашаем студентов, выпускников, а также заинтересованных в публикации своих ивентов.
КАКОЙ ПЛАН ПОСЛЕ ПАР?
В «Дерзком Донере» и «Бау Азия» запустили студенческие комбо:
🌯 499 ₽ — стандартный донер на выбор + напиток
🥢 699 ₽ — блюдо на выбор + авторский лимонад
Два проекта находятся за одной дверью — можно прийти компанией и не спорить, куда идти.
🎓 Покажите действующий студенческий билет при заказе
🕒 По будням, с 15:00 до 18:00
📍 Бауманская, 32, стр. 1
Отправляй одногруппникам и приходите пос…
Что кабан делает осенью перед наступлением холодов?
С: -Готовится к спячке
П: -Черта-с два, это медведь впадает в спячку, а кабан начинает жрать: жрать, жрать и жрать
#Э9
*Студентки заходят на лекцию через полчаса после её начала*
П: Ну что ж вы так долго гуляяяли... Ну так долго гуляяяли...
#Зуев #ИУ8
👍107
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @mgtupage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @mgtupage as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Приёмная комиссия МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана @pk_bmstu · 23,300 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана @bmstu1830 · 29,397 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цитаты преподавателей МГТУ им. Н.Э. Баумана” (@mgtupage), 6,339 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mgtupage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
