с днем рождения меня!🎉 а еще в этот день я сделала первую продажу аксов! представляете, год назад😍кстати это был бантик октавии за 75₽ принимаю подарочки в виде репоста🤩
❤18❤🔥5custom 51881677086963924254

Channel
@mhghoulsrule
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
162subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001554878088 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mhghoulsrule |
| Description | Блог коллекционера кукол Equestria Girls, любящего эту вселенную всем сердцем Заходите на чай, к столу подаем разговоры по душам, обсуждение мультфильмов и, конечно же, магию дружбы!✨💗 По всем вопросам: @daofme |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mhghoulsrule |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 162 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 162 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
229 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 88 | 38.4% | |
| custom 5188167708696392425 | 46 | 20.1% | |
| custom 5364201105146272796 | 26 | 11.4% | |
| 💘 | 17 | 7.42% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 5.68% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 4.37% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 3.49% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 2.62% | |
| custom 5418112651337152666 | 5 | 2.18% | |
| custom 5269756384919961344 | 4 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5420305631573716030 | 4 | 1.75% | |
| custom 5269650385127096513 | 2 | 0.873% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
с днем рождения меня!🎉 а еще в этот день я сделала первую продажу аксов! представляете, год назад😍кстати это был бантик октавии за 75₽ принимаю подарочки в виде репоста🤩
❤18❤🔥5custom 51881677086963924254
Pony life, только в адекватном значении этого слова Обожаю этот фотосет за его простоту и атмосферность😭 https://t.me/mhghoulsrule/2239 — остальное
custom 536420110514627279611❤5❤🔥3
Ну-ка, знатоки, может, вы окажетесь умнее меня? Нашла вот такой классный арт с хуманизацией поняшек, но не могу понять, что за девушки рядом с Зекорой, Винил и Редхарт Upd: узнала, это эпизодические персонажи
custom 53642011051462727966❤2
Эквестрийский чат! Характеры пони из оригинального сериала и девочек из Эквестрии не всегда совпадают. Есть ли персонаж, который больше вам нравится в ЭГ, чем в МЛП, и наоборот? Лично для меня таким персонажем безусловно является Рарити, которая в ЭГ гораздо приятнее по характеру. А вот Рейнбоу Дэш, наоборот, больше мне импонирует в МЛП. Хотя в ЭГ я ее тоже очень люблю! P.S. У Сансет какой-то нескончаемый поток фо…
custom 51881677086963924256❤2
Вот вам еще кусочек лета Буду вас периодически радовать невыложенными фотками
❤15
Что думаете о данном персонаже? Сочувствовали ей или, как я, чувствовали подвох в ее словах и действиях?
custom 51881677086963924257❤2
РАЗОБЛАЧИМ УОЛЛФЛАУЭР С КОНЦАМИ Бесит она меня, нагадила моей девочке( Докажем, что она зря обвиняла Сансет в том, что ее не замечали, поскольку всю память о себе стирала она сама! Что мы знаем? — Она держала обиду на Сансет из-за того, что ту все простили и полюбили, а ее никто даже не помнит — Знакома с Сансет с 9 класса — Знакома с Трикси с 3 класса — Ее фото не было в выпускном альбоме — Нашла камень памяти уже …
custom 51881677086963924255❤4
Всем привет! Во-первых, угадайте кого я заказала в компанию Старлайт🥰 уже моноколлекция какая-то получается Во-вторых, нового контента ближайшее время будет немного, но есть невыложенный постик про Уоллфлауэр Хотите? Я тогда его доработаю и выложу
❤6
Долго не могла вспомнить, в какой же все-таки смотрела я, а потом каааак поняла, в чем дело Я в детстве всегда проматывала песни...😨 Поэтому и не помнила ни одну из них И распознать точно не удастся
custom 53642011051462727969❤2
🌈🎶 Кто в какой озвучке смотрел RR в детстве?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤5
Друзья! Я заказала поняшку! Канекалонку! 🥰 Давайте без подсказок, горячо-холодно?) Может, кто-то сразу догадается)) Это точно не мейн сикс, но персонаж значимый
❤10
Немного о том, почему я считаю озвучку Карусели в сто раз лучше как минимум в плане отыгрыша
💘9❤🔥5custom 54203056315737160304❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @mhghoulsrule. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌈🎶 Кто в какой озвучке смотрел RR в детстве?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2025 to 10 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💗 Портал в Эквестрию 💙” (@mhghoulsrule), 162 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mhghoulsrule.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.