Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mhu Thulan

Channel

Mhu Thulan

@mhu_thulan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,037subscribers

-71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001786782079
TypeChannel
Username@mhu_thulan
Created8 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mhu_thulan

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,0374,1094,0736 August 2026 — 4,108 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,108 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,109 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,099 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,088 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,082 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,083 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,084 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,079 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,075 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,066 subscribers4 September 2026 — 4,059 subscribers10 September 2026 — 4,054 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,048 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,037 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,026–4,120 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:394,037-11
14 Sept 2026, 03:004,048-6
10 Sept 2026, 05:014,054-5
4 Sept 2026, 19:384,059-7
1 Sept 2026, 14:424,066-9
29 Aug 2026, 10:464,075-4
26 Aug 2026, 09:534,079-5
23 Aug 2026, 02:074,084+1
19 Aug 2026, 23:024,083+1
16 Aug 2026, 17:474,082-6
13 Aug 2026, 03:464,088-11
9 Aug 2026, 17:034,099-10
6 Aug 2026, 22:524,109+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:454,108no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:014,108first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 36s
Average length
1m 18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,706 reactions across 18 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52063783571465398382,12937.3%
😁2,00335.1%
😭4838.46%
❤‍🔥3716.50%
🫡1723.01%
👀1162.03%
1061.86%
801.40%
😈500.876%
🤯410.719%
🍾310.543%
👍200.351%
😎120.21%
🐳70.123%
😍70.123%
😢70.123%
👏60.105%
💯60.105%
👎50.088%
💅50.088%
19 further kinds490.859%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,706 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 November 2025 to 13 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mhu_thulan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 November 2025 to 13 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Jan 2026, 17:53 UTC≈17,100 views269 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Якуб узнает своих

❤‍🔥176😁40custom 520637835714653983835🫡953🐳1

13 Jan 2026, 17:28 UTC≈21,800 views281 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5206378357146539838212😁49127👍1

3 Jan 2026, 11:02 UTC≈60,700 views449 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5206378357146539838343😁62🫡354💅2🐳1💩1🤡1

3 Jan 2026, 07:03 UTC≈17,000 views278 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Activation Word: Ronald McDonald

custom 5206378357146539838221🤯36🫡10👍5🆒4💩1😁1

1 Jan 2026, 16:07 UTC≈22,900 views423 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁264🫡99custom 5206378357146539838516💅2👍1

1 Jan 2026, 14:49 UTC≈11,300 views367 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На связи супруга админа. Очень грустные новости. 20.01.2024 Админа убила хохломразь в зоне СВО…

😭257😁64custom 520637835714653983834😢4😱21🐳1🔥1

31 Dec 2025, 13:50 UTC≈10,500 views148 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 520637835714653983896🍾3110👍3🎄2🤡2😁21

26 Dec 2025, 23:01 UTC≈42,200 views379 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭222😁115custom 520637835714653983819🫡8👏6😈4😢31

23 Dec 2025, 16:57 UTC≈40,400 views372 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5206378357146539838275😁7110😍7🫡5🐳2🤡1🤯1

22 Dec 2025, 21:58 UTC≈41,300 views328 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥180custom 520637835714653983884😈46😁732🔥2🙏2

11 Dec 2025, 07:04 UTC≈15,800 views357 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Wow

😁300custom 520637835714653983852🫡4🎄1

2 Dec 2025, 07:47 UTC≈50,400 views356 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

- Hello, John. How are you doing today? I remember you were looking for some insights on the current situation on the Ukrainian battlefield, to see if there are any super profitable Polymarket bets going around. - Yeah, I may have. - Okay, great. The reason for the call today, John, is something just came across my desk. It is perhaps the best thing I've seen during the entire SVO. The name of the village, Orikiv, or

custom 5206378357146539838241😁1058👍1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mhu_thulan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Thule Signal / Алексей Лёвкин / Молоток из РДК
@thulesignal · 28,833
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 9 September 2026
постіронічні політичні меми
@postironicpol · 58,186
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 August 2026
НІП «Тиск»
@TyskNIP · 29,298
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mhu Thulan” (@mhu_thulan), 4,037 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mhu_thulan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.