⠀⠀ Простите, немного пропал, мои сладуськи! Захотелось немного отдохнуть от социальных сетей. Хотя, наверное, такое от меня удивительно читать 🤭
🍓2

Channel
@miamimortynet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003935398672 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miamimortynet |
| Description | < 𝐿𝑒𝓉'𝓈 𝓇𝑜𝓁𝓁 𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈 𝒿𝑜𝒾𝓃𝓉 𝒜𝓃𝒹 𝑔𝑜 𝓉𝑜 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒷𝑒𝒶𝒸𝒽 𝓇𝒾𝑔𝒽𝓉 𝓃𝑜𝓌 𝒲𝑒 𝒸𝒶𝓃 𝒿𝓊𝓈𝓉 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝑜𝓊𝓉 > pfp cr: 0mn11man (X) |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miamimortynet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:22 | 17 | no change |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 17 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 September 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 669 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Oct 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 35.3% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 23.5% | |
| 🍾 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 14.7% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 2.94% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 2.94% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⠀⠀ Простите, немного пропал, мои сладуськи! Захотелось немного отдохнуть от социальных сетей. Хотя, наверное, такое от меня удивительно читать 🤭
🍓2
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 Кивнув, Майами поудобнее хватается за локти и тащит парней в сторону фуд-корта, как будто те без него не справятся или вообще потеряются, стоит их на секунду выпустить. — Хороший выбор, я знаю там за одной из стоек работает мой хороший друг, его коктейли - ну просто прелесть! Выглядят как совершенство и на вкус не мусор, а такой талант, знаете, встретить трудно. Я его даже к нам в клуб звал работать, у…
🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 — Хах, еще бы ты не захотел жить тут. Здесь классно! Нигде такой свободы не ощущал, как в этом месте. Мальчишка переместился меж двумя, с излишней фамильярностью подцепив парней под локти, подначивая тех пойти с собой во внутрь громадного молла, что зазывал их всевозможными красочными вывесками и кричащей попсовой музыкой. — Тогда меньше стесняемся, мальчики, вперед вперед! Мельком Майами заглядывае…
🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 Майами обернулся на неподалеку отозвавшийся голос, что называл его по имени и, грациозно смахнув пряди светлых волос со своего плеча, ярко улыбнулся, как улыбался всегда всем, кого когда-либо встречал в клубе. — Гуччи! Было несложно догадаться кто это был. Дорогая одежда, которая, хоть и не была в стиле танцора, но всё еще показывала статус и эта... Необычная прическа. — Конечно, это я, дорогуш, ты м…
🔥1
⠀⠀ 👍☺️☺️😍👍🙂👍☺️ с Гуччи и Злым Морти <3 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟 Телефон, лежащий на краю бьюти-столика, отозвался парой гудков, оповещая своего хозяина, что неспешно наносил кисточкой ярко-персиковые тени поверх своих век, о том, что тому пришло сообщение. Пришлось отложить кисточку и потянуться за устройством, что Морти делал также абсолютно не спеша, как будто специально растягивая время. — Ах, ну да, я же пообещал. С…
⠀⠀ ? ? ? Ты ебу дал? ? ? Я тебе кем уже стану ? ? ? Вздооооох. Я тебя никогда не брошу, Рик, расслабься, 👑 💭
⠀⠀ Не будем о грустном и работе. Уже Октябрь! Все ведь знают, что это значит? Хэллоуин!! Я вот очень сильно люблю этот праздник, он ведь один из самых ярких и громких, столько повсюду будет тематических вечеринок и развлекаловок, прям не терпится! А потом еще и "Día de los Muertos", у нас в Майами в это время тоже ну очень красиво Думал в этом году пойти как Шанель Оберлин, но в образе из второго сезона, первы…
🍓1
⠀⠀Уж надеюсь! Я бы вообще после такого не хотел отрываться, а только бы и лежал на пляже... Или в спа... Солярии....
Sticker, posted without a caption
⠀⠀Развлекайся? Да я всю ночь на ногах был, козел ты старый! Еще и твои тут невероятные пьяные мысли расшифровывать надо было параллельно! Я устал, у меня болят ножки, голова не варит, а ведь я даже сам еще ни капли в рот не взял! 😭
⠀⠀Конечно конечно, всех вас милашечек ждем! 🌟 И ваши кошельки тоже
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miamimortynet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⋆ . 𝕄𝕚𝕒𝕞𝕚 𝕄𝕠𝕣𝕥𝕪 ⋆˙” (@miamimortynet), 17 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miamimortynet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.