Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,708–1,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 06:41
1,727
+12
12 Sept 2026, 09:56
1,715
-5
8 Sept 2026, 13:20
1,720
-7
3 Sept 2026, 06:57
1,727
-5
30 Aug 2026, 22:52
1,732
-5
28 Aug 2026, 08:34
1,737
-6
25 Aug 2026, 12:54
1,743
-2
22 Aug 2026, 16:46
1,745
-5
19 Aug 2026, 09:15
1,750
-7
16 Aug 2026, 15:49
1,757
-6
13 Aug 2026, 06:56
1,763
+25
10 Aug 2026, 15:15
1,738
-4
8 Aug 2026, 00:12
1,742
-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:01
1,744
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
315 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
170
54.0%
❤🔥
42
13.3%
🔥
26
8.25%
🙏
21
6.67%
👏
18
5.71%
🤣
16
5.08%
💔
7
2.22%
💯
5
1.59%
custom 5388880957891685956
4
1.27%
😍
3
0.952%
🤝
2
0.635%
🥰
1
0.317%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 315 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вы представляете… я типа буду всякие отчетики писать на корейском, разговаривать на корейском (не на английском, котра, привет) с руководителем (корейцем), чет делать в огроменной компании как из дорам (я вам серьезно говорю их офис пиздец поход по расстановке, хз как в русских компаниях)
Мда. Офигеть. Я в шоке
Переводим на корейский 🤙🏻
러시아 사람들이 열받은 소뱌닌의 발언ㅋㅋㅋ 한국어로 번역해보자
“일상을 죽이고 정상적인 경제를 죽이는 건 결국 나라 전체를 죽이는 것이다.” 소뱌닌, 국가 경제 전체를 전시 체제로 전환하자는 주장 비판
💬 우리 경제 아직 살아 있긴 해??? 애초에 경제가 있기는 한 거야??? ㅋㅋㅋ 진작에 없는 걸 죽이겠다니 웃기네!
💬 우리 경제는 난쟁이 좆만 해
💬 진짜 소뱌닌을 위해 햄버거 하나 때리고 싶어지는 몇 안 되는 순간 😂
#한국어 #корейский
*Meta Platforms Inc. признана экстремистской организацией, её деятельность запрещена на территории РФ.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Если бы вдруг был маркет для авторов кпоп мерча в Москве, вы бы пришли посмотреть и потратить свои деньги на всякие уникальные штучки от авторов? Голосуем внизу и говорим свое мнение в принципе про идею в комменты
행복은 멀리 있지 않아
행복은 특별한 날에만 찾아오는 것이 아닙니다. 평범한 하루, 따뜻한 말 한마디, 소소한 웃음처럼 가까이에 있는 작은 순간들이 우리를 가장 행복하게 만들어 줍니다. 오늘의 작은 행복을 놓치지 마세요.
#корейский #한국어 автор korean with sky
Счастье всегда рядом.
Счастье не приходит лишь в особенные дни. Оно живёт в самых простых мгновениях — в тихом и обычном дне, в тёплом слове, в искренней улыбке, в маленьком смехе, который вдруг согревает сердце.
Именно эти, на первый взгляд незаметные, …
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @miankorean. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Школа корейского l Korean Simple @ksdemo · 25,676 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Корейский язык 🇰🇷 @koreanlanguage2023 · 60,679 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“미안, 한국어 🪷 корейский, сорри” (@miankorean), 1,727 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miankorean.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.