Channel
@miasexpert
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,087subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001133499485 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miasexpert |
| Created | 19 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miasexpert |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 2,087 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 2,093 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 2,092 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 2,094 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 2,097 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 2,098 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 2,099 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 2,103 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 2,106 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 2,108 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 2,107 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 2,107 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
141 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😢 | 40 | 28.4% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 19.9% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 12.8% | |
| 🤔 | 17 | 12.1% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 7.09% | |
| 😐 | 9 | 6.38% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 5.67% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 3.55% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 2.84% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.709% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.709% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Банкротят бизнес-партнера экс-судьи В. Момотова Арбитражный суд Краснодарского края ввел процедуру реструктуризации долгов Андрея Марченко — бывшего бизнес-партнера экс-главы Совета судей Виктора Момотова.
🤔1
Антикоррупционный иск в отношении бывшего судьи М. Е. Керасова На основании заключения Квалификационной коллегии судей Краснодарского края по результатам проверки обращения Ю. Н. Ушакова в отношении судьи Октябрьского районного суда г. Новороссийска Краснодарского края Манолиса Евстафиевича Керасова на него наложено дисциплинарное взыскание в виде досрочного прекращения полномочий судьи с лишением шестого квалифик…
🥰1
Есть ли смысл в конференциях? https://zakon.ru/blog/2026/6/4/est_li_zapros_na_novye_konferencii
Стоит ли российским научным журналам разрешить авторам использовать ИИ при написании статей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📚 Крупнейшее в мире издательство Elsevier официально разрешило использовать ИИ Elsevier, один из ведущих академических издателей мира (выпускает журналы The Lancet и Cell), опубликовал чёткие правила использования генеративного ИИ. Это сигнал: нейросети становятся легальным инструментом в науке. Что разрешено авторам? ИИ можно использовать для синтеза литературы, поиска исследовательских пробелов, генерации идей, …
👍5
Дело СК против арбитражного судьи Возбуждено с согласия Высшей квалификационной коллегии судей и расследуется уголовное дело в отношении судьи Арбитражного суда Калининградской области Ефименко Сергея Геннадьевич (выпускника дневного отделения экономико-правового факультета Калининградского государственного университета, работающего в АС Калининградской области с 2006 года) по п. «в» ч. 5 ст. 290 УК РФ о получении в…
❤5
ВККС РФ На заседания ВККС РФ 17 июля 2026 г. (в пятницу, по дополненной повестке) рассмотрено представление Председателя Следственного комитета Российской Федерации о даче согласия на возбуждение уголовного дела в отношении судьи Лазаревского районного суда г. Сочи Краснодарского края в отставке Богдановича Сергея Павловича по признакам преступления, предусмотренного частью 6 статьи 290 Уголовного кодекса Российской…
🤔3❤1
📊 РУДН отменил дипломы для юристов. Но был ли он первым? Недавно мы писали, что Сочинский институт РУДН отказался от выпускных квалификационных работ для бакалавров-юристов из-за развития ИИ. Однако, как выяснил Правовой портал Legal Bulletin, эта новость оказалась преувеличением. ☝️На самом деле защита ВКР на бакалавриате по юриспруденции уже много лет не практикуется во многих ведущих вузах России. Таким образом, …
🤔5
ВККС РФ На ближайшем заседании Высшей квалификационной коллегии судей Российской Федерации 13-17 июля 2026 г. запланировано рассмотрение представлений Председателя Следственного комитета Российской Федерации о даче согласия на возбуждение уголовных дел в отношении: — судьи Ленинск-Кузнецкого районного суда Кемеровской области в отставке Долгих Натальи Валентиновны по признакам преступлений, предусмотренных частью …
🤔5
Как вы относитесь к отказу от выпускных квалификационных работ по юриспруденции?
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚖️ Конец эпохи дипломов? В России впервые отменили дипломы для юристов из-за ИИ 🏫Сочинский институт РУДН стал первым вузом в стране, отказавшимся от выпускных квалификационных работ для бакалавров по направлению «Юриспруденция». Причина — стремительное развитие нейросетей. 👨💻Современный ИИ способен за считаные минуты проанализировать судебную практику, сформировать правовую позицию и написать структурированный текс…
❤2
📊 МГУ, МГЮА, ВШЭ, СПбГУ, МГИМО — топ-5 юридических вузов 2026 Наш Правовой портал Legal Bulletin представляет обновлённый рейтинг юридических вузов России, составленный по итогам опроса ведущих практиков — управляющих партнёров, руководителей юридических фирм и адвокатских образований. 📊 Ключевые тренды: • Первая пятёрка остаётся устойчивой по сравнению с рейтингом 2025 года • Заметен рост региональных школ — КФУ, У…
👍6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miasexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Стоит ли российским научным журналам разрешить авторам использовать ИИ при написании статей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы относитесь к отказу от выпускных квалификационных работ по юриспруденции?
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие темы вы хотели бы видеть в нашем канале? (можно выбрать несколько вариантов)
The shares total 244%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Издательство МИАС Эксперт” (@miasexpert), 2,087 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miasexpert.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.