Channel
@michaelstrachowitz
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
715subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001491203460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @michaelstrachowitz |
| Created | 10 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/michaelstrachowitz |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 715 | +4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:10 | 711 | -2 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 713 | -3 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 716 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 712 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 711 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 712 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 714 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 711 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 712 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 712 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
97 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 71 | 73.2% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 20.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 4.12% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.03% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.03% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ja, wir hatten viel Spaß bei der Eröffnung der neuen großzügigen Unternehmenszentrale der Elementum AG im Juli in Sindelfingen. Der Gründer, ein seit Jahrzehnten alter Freund und Weggefährte, Bojan Pravica, hatte mich eingeladen, bei der Eröffnungsfeier einen kleinen Vortrag zum Thema "Kommunikation und zwischenmenschliche Beziehungen" zu halten. Es war ein großartiger Nachmittag mit hochkarätigen Gästen aus Vertrieb…
❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0qrEiusuAWo&pp=ygUfR2zDvGNrbGljaCBzZWluIGdlc2NoaWVodCBqZXR6dA%3D%3D
➡️ Möchtest Du glücklich sein? “Blöde Frage!”, wirst Du jetzt denken, “natürlich will ich das. Schließlich bin ich kein Masochist und habe Spaß am Leiden”. Prima, dann sind wir uns da schon einmal einig. Ich denke jeder möchte glücklich oder zumindest zufrieden sein. In der amerikanischen Verfassung ist das Streben nach Glück ja sogar als Grundrecht verankert. Aber warum sind wir es dann nicht so oft und so lange, w…
❤5👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Auch mit einer Auszeit ist es leider einmal aus. Ich genieße den letzten Urlaubstag bei bestem Wetter auf der wunderschönen Insel Sylt. Aber wie heißt es im markigen Kultspruch aus den "Terminator"-Filmen so schön: "Ich komme wieder!"
👍9❤5🤩1
Photo, posted without a caption
Sie ist schon beeindruckend, die Lindenallee im Park von Schloss Eutin in Schleswig Holstein! Dieser Ausflug hat sich gelohnt!
Photo, posted without a caption
👍7🔥1
Tut gut, so eine kleine Auszeit. Gerade genieße ich ein paar entspannte und nicht so heiße Tage an der Ostsee in Timmendorfer Strand.
👍8❤1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍6❤1
Erreichen oder verhindern? Jeder Mensch wird von etwas angetrieben. Entscheidend ist jedoch, ob wir etwas erreichen oder lediglich etwas verhindern wollen. Manche handeln aus eigener Motivation und Vorfreude, andere fühlen sich von äußeren Umständen oder Angst getrieben. Angst kann zwar kurzfristig motivieren, führt aber selten zu vollem Einsatz. Wer nur Negatives vermeiden will, tut oft nur das Nötigste und empfin…
👍7❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @michaelstrachowitz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇩🇪Michael Strachowitz” (@michaelstrachowitz), 715 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/michaelstrachowitz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.