Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mid-Century, More Than

Channel

Mid-Century, More Than

@midcenturymodern

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,611subscribers

+196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430910344
TypeChannel
Username@midcenturymodern
DescriptionРусско-английский канал о модернизме XX века в архитектуре и дизайне. —— This is a bilingual channel about mid-century architecture and design. ✉️@mid_mod_bot knd.gov.ru/license?id=6735f1b015601c23cb22e799&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created20 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/midcenturymodern

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

17,41017,63317,521.57 August 2026 — 17,415 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,415 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,435 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,467 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,468 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,467 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,470 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,467 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,465 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,466 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,464 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,458 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,462 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,457 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,447 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,448 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,454 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,455 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,457 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,456 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,457 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,455 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,454 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,453 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,447 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,442 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,440 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,432 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,435 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,434 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,429 subscribers26 September 2026 — 17,414 subscribers4 October 2026 — 17,410 subscribers9 October 2026 — 17,420 subscribers13 October 2026 — 17,413 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,482 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,553 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,592 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,605 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,617 subscribers20 October 2026 — 17,620 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,624 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,628 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,629 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,633 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,631 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,630 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,631 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,629 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,630 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,625 subscribers2 November 2026 — 17,628 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,625 subscribers4 November 2026 — 17,617 subscribers5 November 2026 — 17,615 subscribers6 November 2026 — 17,611 subscribers17,6117 August 20266 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 92 days, net +196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,377–17,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:4917,611-4
5 Nov 2026, 23:5017,615-2
4 Nov 2026, 20:5817,617-8
3 Nov 2026, 22:5717,625-3
2 Nov 2026, 19:3917,628+3
1 Nov 2026, 16:5817,625-5
31 Oct 2026, 15:2817,630+1
30 Oct 2026, 18:1917,629-2
29 Oct 2026, 16:4717,631+1
28 Oct 2026, 13:0517,630-1
27 Oct 2026, 14:0117,631-2
26 Oct 2026, 16:2617,633+4
25 Oct 2026, 17:4717,629+1
24 Oct 2026, 17:5817,628+4
23 Oct 2026, 16:4417,624+4
20 Oct 2026, 02:3017,620+3
18 Oct 2026, 23:5917,617+12
17 Oct 2026, 23:0017,605+13
16 Oct 2026, 20:3617,592+39
15 Oct 2026, 18:2817,553first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.13%
avg views ÷ 17,611 subscribers
Avg views / post
727
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held33 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total5,816
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 04:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈22,200
Videos
≈21
Links
≈3,050

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
46s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

799 reactions across 33 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤42653.3%
🔥16821.0%
👍15419.3%
💔293.63%
😁111.38%
🤨60.751%
😍40.501%
👎10.125%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 799 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
61
across the posts below
Posts paid on
28
of 33 we hold a reading for · 85%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @midcenturymodern. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC318 views13 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, с радостью сообщаем вам - особенно петербуржцам, - что наш друг Женя Рулев в очередной раз ждет в гости всех, кому интересны не только коллекционные модели автомобилей, но и познавательные, полные драматизма и юмора истории об автомобилестроении и, в частности, автомобильных гонках. В Музее игрушек на Петроградской стороне сейчас проходит выставка почти сотни моделей из уникальной Жениной коллекции, и сам кол…

🔥7❤5👍1

6 Nov 2026, 12:30 UTC486 views14 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

В юбилейном, десятом, номере «Площади» даем слово отелю «Marco Polo», о котором мы уже писали когда-то. Встреча «Найти свое место», прошедшая 3 ноября в Гостиной Авито Путешествий в «Marco Polo», - это повод присмотреться и ко второй части проекта площадки и отеля. В тематическом номере деревянный стул викторианской эпохи соседствует со светильниками советского периода, кованой этажеркой для цветов, старинным тексти…

❤7👍4🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 19:17 UTC589 views23 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В истории французского дизайна второе по распространенности место - после стула-моноблока - занимает, пожалуй, стул А. К счастью, в отличие от моноблока, автор которого неизвестен, стул А имеет свидетельство о рождении, подтверждающее его благородные корни. Этот стул был создан потомственным жестянщиком и кровельщиком Ксавье Пошаром. Начиная с 1908 г. этот бургундец изготавливал в своей мастерской ведра и лейки, раз…

❤17👍4🔥2

4 Nov 2026, 19:44 UTC640 views31 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

После успеха своей коллекции, выполненной в технике «Рисовое зерно» и привлекшей внимание керамистов всего мира к этому старинному методу, Фридл Холцер-Кьеллберг не остановилась на достигнутом. Она принялась экспериментировать с глазурями, причем в основном старинными, такими, которые тоже пришли с Востока. Чаще всего она обращалась к глазури «сан-де-беф» («бычья кровь»), отличавшейся глубоким красным цветом, и бирю…

❤19👍5🔥4💔3

3 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC749 views35 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Интерьер недели Ваш покорный админ только что вернулся из командировки в Стамбул, график которой был настолько насыщенным, что пришлось сделать паузу в публикациях. Среди интересных находок этой поездки - вегетарианский ресторан «Telezzüz», интерьеры которого впечатляют не менее, чем изысканное дегустационное меню. Открывшееся пару лет назад, это заведение стало первым турецким рестораном, предложившим посетителям …

❤19🔥10👍5🤨1

28 Oct 2026, 20:11 UTC≈1,120 views29 reactions2 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

В 1960 г. лучшим пластмассовым изделием пятидесятых, как утверждают некоторые - в том числе уважаемые - шведские источники, было признано ведро. Да, простое бытовое ведро! А его автор, шведский дизайнер Карл-Арне Брегер, получил прозвище «тот парень с ведром». На самом деле это ведро не так наивно, как кажется на первый взгляд. Бергер спроектировал его в 1955 г., когда работал в компании «Gustavsberg», с 1945 г. зан…

❤13🔥8👍4😁4

27 Oct 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,010 views29 reactions2 Starsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Стулья, вдохновленные креслами вождей африканских племен, в первую очередь, живущих на территории Конго, были в репертуаре не только Тео Рута, но и многих других его современников. Так, например, в том же 1953 году финский дизайнер Илмари Тапиоваара, получив в подарок от друга традиционное конголезское кресло, состоявшее из двух отдельных элементов - спинки (с ножками) и сиденья (тоже с ножками), - которые могли хран…

❤14👍8🔥7

26 Oct 2026, 19:40 UTC904 views23 reactions2 Starsread 3 November 2026
Photo

В конце августа в газете «The New York Times» была опубликована статья о недавно вышедшей монографии американского фотографа Ли Фридландера «Life Still». 92-летний художник сказал о ней и других своих альбомах: «Мой художественный материал - это книги. Мне больше нравится, когда мои работы оказываются на страницах книги нежели на стенах. Книгу можно взять с собой, положить в карман, и она будет путешествовать с тобо…

❤13👍5🔥4🤨1

2 Sept 2026, 20:20 UTC474 views29 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Были времена, когда Колобки были действительно симпатичными, как, например, последняя работа Эдуарда Михайловича Криммера, сервиз «Колобок». Эдуард Михайлович и раньше обращался к теме сдобы: в 1957-1958 гг. он придумал очень трогательный и уютный набор «Прошу пожаловать», вдохновленный своими воспоминаниями о вывесках на провинциальных булочных и чайных. А в 1964 г. свет увидел сервиз «Колобок». Вот что писал об это…

❤19👍7🔥3

2 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC434 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @romashedaPhoto

Начинаем учебный год вместе с сообществом дизайн-админов Мы решили отметить День знаний подборкой образовательных проектов, придуманных участницами и участниками нашего сообщества. Выбирайте! Запись онлайн-конференции «Всё, что надо знать дизайнеру в 2026 году». Восемь ёмких лекций, которые помогают эффективно вести дизайнерский бизнес в непростое кризисное время: работа с бюджетом, покупки на «Авито», стилизация и…

🔥3

1 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC936 views42 reactions4 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Друзья! По архитектурному сообществу прокатилась волна недовольства, достигшая и нас: осенью начнется демонтаж Шуховской башни, за которым последует реконструкция. По опубликованным сведениям, при реконструкции может быть заменено более 40% оригинальных элементов. По поводу объема и методики реконструкции мы ничего не можем сказать вследствие своей некомпетентности: нам неизвестно, каково состояние металла, котором…

💔26❤10🔥3🤨2👍1

31 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC935 views21 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Заканчивается очередной понедельник, а это значит, что пришло время для еще одной кофейной истории, на сей раз из США, где начиная с 1920-х гг. работал Люрелль Гилд, дизайнер, которого журнал «Forbes» в 1936 г. включил в пятерку ведущих промышленных дизайнеров Америки. Гилд действительно мог соперничать с такими мэтрами американского дизайна, как Рэймонд Лоуи или Норман Бел Геддес, по крайней мере с точки зрения пло…

❤10🔥10👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @midcenturymodern. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Каталог Алвара Аалто
@catalogalvara · 19,889
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
домики
@domiki_everyday · 22,332
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
INTERIOR+DESIGN
@interiorplusdesign · 54,170
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
WoL — Way of Living
@wolmagazine · 21,190
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
Design Mate
@designmate · 23,074
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Изящное садоводство
@gracefulgardens · 21,237
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 September 2026
Marie Claire Maison Russia
@mcmaison_russia · 30,119
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Architecture
@Architecture2021 · 35,716
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
Ромашковый сбор
@romasheda · 24,483
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Russian Architecture
@RussianArchitecture · 49,376
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Новый русский // Культурный код
@newrussian_cc · 50,896
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mid-Century, More Than” (@midcenturymodern), 17,611 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/midcenturymodern.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.