Channel
WOLF
@mika191xpet917
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,523subscribers
-58 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001918682882 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mika191xpet917 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mika191xpet917 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:25 | 1,523 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 1,528 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:01 | 1,530 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 1,531 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 1,533 | -4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 1,537 | -5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:41 | 1,542 | +4 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 1,538 | +3 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 00:00 | 1,535 | -8 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 1,543 | -25 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 00:13 | 1,568 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 1,568 | -6 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 1,574 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 1,577 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:45 | 1,581 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@crash_egy · 18,446
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 4 October 2026
@xBET_MENA_MAR · 19,209
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 October 2026
@tsggu · 35,574
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@sniper1xbeet · 18,135
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 October 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WOLF” (@mika191xpet917), 1,523 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mika191xpet917.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.