Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дизайнер на миллион 💲

Channel

Дизайнер на миллион 💲

@mika_it1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,434subscribers

-85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121357454
TypeChannel
Username@mika_it1
Created24 May 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mika_it1

Growth

16,41816,51916,468.56 August 2026 — 16,519 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,519 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,511 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,504 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,501 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,507 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,497 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,492 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,494 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,497 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,492 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,485 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,475 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,463 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,471 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,468 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,465 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,460 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,452 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,445 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,439 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,435 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,428 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,418 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,439 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,434 subscribers16,4346 August 20268 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 33 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,403–16,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 12:3916,434-5
5 Sept 2026, 04:1916,439+21
3 Sept 2026, 06:2416,418-10
2 Sept 2026, 01:1516,428-7
1 Sept 2026, 00:2616,435-4
31 Aug 2026, 01:5416,439-6
30 Aug 2026, 04:1816,445-7
29 Aug 2026, 03:2616,452-8
28 Aug 2026, 00:1516,460-5
27 Aug 2026, 00:0316,465-3
26 Aug 2026, 02:3716,468-3
25 Aug 2026, 01:5216,471+8
23 Aug 2026, 15:4816,463-12
22 Aug 2026, 03:4516,475-10
20 Aug 2026, 19:2316,485-7
19 Aug 2026, 21:1216,492-5
18 Aug 2026, 19:3516,497+3
17 Aug 2026, 16:0516,494+2
16 Aug 2026, 07:5816,492-5
14 Aug 2026, 17:2616,497first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.8%
avg views ÷ 16,434 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,270
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held14 (22 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total18,176
Reactions total1,108
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,766 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
92152.2%
🔥39722.5%
❤‍🔥995.61%
👍734.13%
😁724.08%
🤩533.00%
😍432.43%
😱251.42%
🎉201.13%
🤣160.906%
🌚140.793%
💯140.793%
😐50.283%
👌40.227%
🤯40.227%
🥰20.113%
🌭10.057%
🐳10.057%
🤔10.057%
🥱10.057%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,766 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mika_it1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTC886 views99 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Гостевой санузел, в котором я не стала экономить на впечатлении. Мрамор, роспись, мягкий свет и детали, которые делают маленькое пространство очень большим по эффекту. Считаете, что гостевой су должен быть очень нарядным?

77🤩12🔥10

28 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,630 views131 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Что еще посоветуете?

😁6128🤣13👍11😍8❤‍🔥5🔥5

26 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,920 views90 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Новая серия

63🔥16👍7🤣2🤯1😐1

25 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,990 views134 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Следующая комната нашей квартиры. Здесь хотелось сделать пространство, в котором одинаково красиво выглядит и обычный завтрак, и большой ужин с гостями. Классическая кухня, длинный стол, хрусталь, графичные чёрные акценты и та самая немного парижская атмосфера, ради которой хочется накрывать стол даже без особого повода. Продолжение следует.

🔥9240🥰2

22 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈2,360 views224 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Как вам кухонный остров за 45 млн руб?

❤‍🔥92🔥59😱2520🌚14😍8👍3🌭1

20 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,610 views134 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

А мы начинаем первый интерьерный сериал. Пока в этой истории их двое. Но это только начало. Подписывайтесь, чтобы увидеть всю квартиру и познакомиться со всеми героями. Продолжение следует.

95🔥23😁11🤯3🤣1😐1

18 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈2,510 views159 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Очень красивый будет новый проект

110🔥29🤩12😍5❤‍🔥1🐳1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC≈3,270 views137 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

КЛАССИКА ИЛИ СОВРЕМЕННОСТЬ? Какую гостиную выбрали бы Вы?

94🤩23👍12😍8

6 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,360 views148 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Интерьер, собранный строго по правилам одного стиля, часто получается правильным, но слишком предсказуемым. Мне интереснее соединять разное: классическую архитектуру и современное искусство, коллекционную мебель и вещи с историей, сложные материалы и неожиданные детали. А Вам ближе чистота одного стиля или эклектика?

🔥8747💯14

31 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC≈2,700 views137 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Почему дорогая ванная не обязана быть белой? 5 причин: 1. Натуральный камень, а не цвет. Ощущение дорогого интерьера создаёт не белая палитра, а выразительная природная текстура и качество материала. 2. Контраст делает пространство глубже. Тёмные поверхности подчёркивают объём, свет и фактуру, если грамотно выстроены пропорции. 3. Тёплый металл добавляет благородства. Бронза и латунь работают мягче и сложнее, чем х

88🔥37👍7👌4❤‍🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC≈2,530 views159 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Этот интерьер был реализован в 2017 году. И сегодня я бы почти ничего в нём не изменила. Потому что хорошие интерьеры строятся не вокруг моды. Они строятся вокруг правильных пропорций, качественных натуральных материалов, продуманных столярных решений, классических декоративных элементов и предметов, которые не теряют своей ценности со временем. Именно поэтому в таких проектах появляются Baccarat, Chelini, Ralph La

113🔥27👍16😐3

23 Jul 2026, 07:54 UTC≈2,350 views91 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

https://dg-home.ru/catalog/krovati/ P.S. вот такое постельное белье я хотела делать в коллаборации

55👍16😍14🤩6

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mika_it1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Виктория Демидова
@demivikademivika · 34,553
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дизайнер на миллион 💲” (@mika_it1), 16,434 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mika_it1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.