Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for mikaprok

Channel

mikaprok

@mikaprok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,690subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001073733695
TypeChannel
Username@mikaprok
Created23 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mikaprok

Growth

3,6733,6903,681.55 August 2026 — 3,678 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,678 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,681 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,679 subscribers15 August 2026 — 3,676 subscribers18 August 2026 — 3,675 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,673 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,676 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,690 subscribers5 August 20266 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 31 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,670–3,693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 07:383,690+14
27 Aug 2026, 21:143,676+3
21 Aug 2026, 02:123,673-2
18 Aug 2026, 03:523,675-1
15 Aug 2026, 09:453,676-3
12 Aug 2026, 07:123,679-2
9 Aug 2026, 01:113,681+3
6 Aug 2026, 04:333,678no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:303,678first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

510 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25149.2%
🔥13125.7%
🤔6612.9%
489.41%
👏142.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 578 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC946 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Неагрессивное поглощение Еще одно соображение на тему тактики КНР. Прямо сейчас Пекин одновременно усиливает давление в нескольких районах — в Восточно-Китайском и Южно-Китайском морях, а также в западной части Тихого океана. Это такая универсальная проверка мобилизации Соединенных Штатов и союзников ответить на эти вызовы. В этом смысле интересно то, что учения проводятся рядом с Филиппинами, а затянувшийся конфл

👍17🔥7🤔32

5 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈4,240 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мяч-то круглый! В новостных каналах оживление: «Саудовская Аравия покупает Electronic Arts за $55 миллиардов». Как обычно и бывает – ни одного строгого совпадения с фактами не обнаружено. Не Саудовская Аравия, а три фонда, один из которых принадлежит «главному дипломату США», а по совместительству зятю Короля президента США Джареду Кушнеру (Affinity Partners). От Саудовской Аравии там фигурирует Public Investment

🔥2916👍11👏6

5 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈1,170 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

3🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,240 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍3

4 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC≈1,260 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новый старый фронт Новостные агентства в Индии сообщают об очередной эскалации. Пакистан сосредоточил на границе крупную артиллерийскую группировку из 250 155-мм гаубиц SH-15. Серьезная заявка на победу в виртуальной войне 😊 Если неуместные отбросить страхи, то окажется, что речь идет об энергетическом рынке ЮВА. КНР достаточно агрессивно сыграл на этом споре и военном рынке. Контракт на 236 SH-15 Пакистан подписа

👍17🤔8🔥72

30 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC≈2,050 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сумасшедший дом Ситуация с Ираном кажется анекдотической ровно настолько же насколько анекдотическими выглядят все Республиканские войны. Администрация Трампа последовательно выбирает радикальный вариант т.н. стратегии Эллсберга-Шеллинга, которую в середине прошлого века уютно назвали madman theory. Такая управляемая (в меру скромных сил) демонстрация непредсказуемости. Противник не может уверенно просчитать следую

👍40🤔76🔥5

29 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,970 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Прогнозисты плохой погоды Британские СМИ наперебой критикуют новое лицо местной климатической повестки, министра иностранных дел Эда Милибенда. Посмотреть со стороны – так это главный виновник повышения цен на островную электроэнергию. Милибенд тем временем заявился на лидерскую роль в программе Всемирного Банка по переходу Земли на альтернативную энергетику. В рамках этой программы больше всех платят те страны,

🔥19👍10🤔101

28 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,790 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Шитьё белыми нитками В очередной раз неспокойный член Североатлантического Альянса внес сумятицу в стройные ряды союзников. Да-да, опять Турция. Турцию начали всерьез «возвращать» в программу F-35 в 2025 году, когда после нескольких лет стали публично говорить о возможном урегулировании вопроса до конца года. К январю 2026 года Эрдоган уже сам говорил, что возвращение в программу укрепило бы отношения с США и обор

👍26🔥16🤔5👏31

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @mikaprok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Karfagen
@karfagen_official_te · 35,553
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Председатель СНТ
@predsedatelprav · 44,116
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“mikaprok” (@mikaprok), 3,690 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mikaprok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.