Channel
@miki6797
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
119subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003395812270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @miki6797 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miki6797 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 119 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 115 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 111 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:42 | 110 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 111 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 112 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 112 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
42 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 19 | 45.2% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 26.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 14.3% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 7.14% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 7.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @miki6797. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я знаю, выглядит ужасно, но это Мики из вселенной человек паук(я буду делать нормальную модельку с ней и артик) говорю сразу: я не нашла нормальных штанов для неё и рисунок не меч,а паук
Продолжение;3 ХУХАХАХА)) ЗДРАВСТВУЙТЕ ЗДРАВСТВУЙТЕ. Ну нет не здравствуйте.. боже почему так официально, ладно Итак вопросы. 1. Когда вы вступили в фд дронов и какая причина на то была? 2. Если бы не фд дронов то какой? 3. Чем бы вы занимались если бы не косплеем? 4. Ваша любимая еда?? 5. Почему вы такая хорошая?(ヽ︿ヽ） Ой😨 здравствуйте;3 1.если не ошибаюсь то примерно к 4-5й серии дронов, а причина бывшая подр…
Вопрос ответ;3 Привет^^ Как дела? ] Приветик;3 Да в прицепе нормально(≡^∇^≡) сколько сил и времени занял твой нынешний косплей? Если честно, много сил, так как я не могла сделать парик, а на тот момент мне надо было его быстрее сделать, так как был предстоящий вк фест, и не хотелось идти в старом, так что из‑за этого мой парик кривой и неаккуратный. А по времени много, так как я постоянно забрасывала дело из‑за …
💘2
Может вопрос ответ? @Mikis6797_bot
Давайте вы мне добьете сикс севенн папищеков??
💘1
На правду не обижаюсь ТГК:Подвал Мики #дроныубийцы #узи #ду #ксплей #косплейузи #косплейущидроныубийцы #ккспоейдроныубийцы
❤1💘1
Всем привет, привет! На связи Мики. Я ещё вчера думала, что бы взять рест, но решила написать об этом сегодня, так как вчера был день рождения у Айрис;3 С прошедшим её! С сегодняшнего дня беру рест чисто в косплей-комьюнити, если можно так сказать, тк дальше буду выпускать гачу, когда я буду в 1-м из рестов;3 Что за чушь я несу:< Если что, я заранее делала видео и автоматически вам вышлю 3 видео;3 Простите, если не п…
🥰3💘2
ДАВАЙТЕ ЙОГУРТУ 90 ПОДПИСЧИКОВ НОБЬЁМ? Рт?
💘1
Бебебеб Думаю сделать какие нибудь гача трендики с Йогуртиии
❤🔥3💘1
Sticker, posted without a caption
💘1
Я В ТАКОМ ШОКЕ ТАМ ЯЯЯЯ кстати, у желейки мне нравиться косплей ;3 P.S- Я ЗАБЫЛАА ссылка на видео;3-https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4V68yAP/
❤🔥3❤1💘1
Хочу ещё раз поздравить Айрис с днём рождения! Я пыталась нарисовать артик для неё （Ω Д Ω） Я не знала какой задний фон поставить и решила взять из видео;3 Давайте её поздравим!
🔥3💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @miki6797. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@miki6797 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Подвал Мики (Rest?)” (@miki6797), 119 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miki6797.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.